World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
89
Citations
31753
World Ranking
12612
National Ranking
6449

Nancy L. Keating publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nancy L. Keating sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 485 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Nancy L. Keating D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nancy L. Keating sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Nancy L. Keating is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Economics, Econometrics, and Finance, with a significant focus on subfields such as Economics and Econometrics, Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, and Family Practice.

The scope of their work covers multiple main topics including:

  • Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy

The scientist's recent papers highlight their focus on oncology, health disparities, and opioid access in cancer patients. These papers include:

  • NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Older Adult Oncology, Version 1.2021 (2021), Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
  • Assessment of Racial Disparities in Primary Care Physician Specialty Referrals (2021), JAMA Network Open
  • Medicaid Expansion and Mortality Among Patients With Breast, Lung, and Colorectal Cancer (2020), JAMA Network Open
  • US Trends in Opioid Access Among Patients With Poor Prognosis Cancer Near the End-of-Life (2021), Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Opioid Access and Urine Drug Screening Among Older Patients With Poor-Prognosis Cancer Near the End of Life (2023), Journal of Clinical Oncology

They have published extensively in several venues, with the most frequent publication venues including:

  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (30 publications)
  • JAMA Network Open (15 publications)
  • UNC Libraries (13 publications)
  • JAMA Health Forum (7 publications)
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (6 publications)

Collaboration is evident in their frequent co-authors, such as:

  • Mary Beth Landrum (37 co-authored works)
  • Alexi A. Wright (34 co-authored works)
  • Stacie B. Dusetzina (26 co-authored works)
  • Gabriel A. Brooks (23 co-authored works)
  • Haiden A. Huskamp (15 co-authored works)

Recognition of their contributions includes membership in the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease During Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

    Nancy L. Keating;A. James O'Malley;Matthew R. Smith

  • Patients’ Expectations about Effects of Chemotherapy for Advanced Cancer

    Jane C. Weeks;Paul J. Catalano;Angel Cronin;Matthew D. Finkelman

  • Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy.

    Jim C. Hu;Xiangmei Gu;Stuart R. Lipsitz;Michael J. Barry

  • Place of Death: Correlations With Quality of Life of Patients With Cancer and Predictors of Bereaved Caregivers' Mental Health

    Alexi A. Wright;Nancy L. Keating;Tracy A. Balboni;Ursula A. Matulonis

  • Adverse Effects of Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Strategies to Mitigate Them

    Paul L. Nguyen;Shabbir M.H. Alibhai;Shehzad Basaria;Anthony V. D’Amico

  • Survival After Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-stage Cervical Cancer

    Alexander Melamed;Daniel J. Margul;Ling Chen;Nancy L. Keating

  • Androgen-deprivation therapy in prostate cancer and cardiovascular risk: a science advisory from the American Heart Association, American Cancer Society, and American Urological Association: endorsed by the American Society for Radiation Oncology.

    Glenn N. Levine;Anthony V. D'Amico;Peter Berger;Peter E. Clark

  • Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease During Androgen Deprivation Therapy: Observational Study of Veterans With Prostate Cancer

    Nancy L. Keating;A. James O'Malley;Stephen J. Freedland;Matthew R. Smith

  • A Systematic Assessment of Benefits and Risks to Guide Breast Cancer Screening Decisions

    Lydia E. Pace;Nancy L. Keating;Nancy L. Keating

  • Associations Between End-of-Life Discussion Characteristics and Care Received Near Death: A Prospective Cohort Study

    Jennifer W. Mack;Angel Cronin;Nancy L. Keating;Nathan Taback

  • Cost Sharing and Adherence to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

    Stacie B. Dusetzina;Aaron N. Winn;Gregory A. Abel;Haiden A. Huskamp

  • Combined-Modality Treatment for Resectable Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma to the Liver: Surgical Resection of Hepatic Metastases in Combination With Continuous Infusion of Chemotherapy—An Intergroup Study

    M. Margaret Kemeny;Sudeshna Adak;Bruce Gray;John S. Macdonald

  • Use of Hormone Replacement Therapy by Postmenopausal Women in the United States

    Nancy L. Keating;Paul D. Cleary;Alice S. Rossi;Alan M. Zaslavsky

  • End-of-life care discussions among patients with advanced cancer: a cohort study.

    Jennifer W. Mack;Angel Cronin;Nathan Taback;Haiden A. Huskamp

  • Physician factors associated with discussions about end‐of‐life care

    Nancy L. Keating;Mary Beth Landrum;Selwyn O. Rogers;Susan K. Baum

  • Family Perspectives on Aggressive Cancer Care Near the End of Life.

    Alexi A. Wright;Nancy L. Keating;John Z. Ayanian;Elizabeth A. Chrischilles

  • Evidence-Based Risk Communication: A Systematic Review

    Daniella A. Zipkin;Craig A. Umscheid;Nancy L. Keating;Elizabeth Allen

  • Associations between palliative chemotherapy and adult cancer patients’ end of life care and place of death: prospective cohort study

    Alexi A Wright;Baohui Zhang;Nancy L Keating;Jane C Weeks

  • Treatment Decision Making in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Should Surgeons Match Patients’ Desired Level of Involvement?

    Nancy L. Keating;Edward Guadagnoli;Mary Beth Landrum;Catherine Borbas

  • How are patients’ specific ambulatory care experiences related to trust, satisfaction, and considering changing physicians?

    Nancy L. Keating;Diane C. Green;Audiey C. Kao;Julie A. Gazmararian

Frequent Co-Authors

Katherine L. Kahn
Katherine L. Kahn University of California, Los Angeles
Haiden A. Huskamp
Haiden A. Huskamp Harvard University
Bruce E. Landon
Bruce E. Landon Harvard University
Eric P. Winer
Eric P. Winer Yale University
Stacie B. Dusetzina
Stacie B. Dusetzina Vanderbilt University
Barbara J. McNeil
Barbara J. McNeil Harvard University
Matthew R. Smith
Matthew R. Smith Harvard University
Lawrence N. Shulman
Lawrence N. Shulman University of Pennsylvania
John Z. Ayanian
John Z. Ayanian University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Alan M. Zaslavsky
Alan M. Zaslavsky Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of medicine offers diverse career opportunities beyond becoming a physician. For those interested in patient care, cheap online fnp programs make it possible to become a Family Nurse Practitioner from the comfort of your home, often at a lower cost than traditional on-campus programs.

The pharmaceutical industry is another pathway. Accredited online pharmacy schools let you earn advanced degrees and open doors to clinical and research roles.

Technological advances have created high demand for health informatics professionals. With flexible health informatics degrees, you can specialize in health data, electronic records, and information management systems.

If you’re looking for a fast entry into healthcare, consider medical billing and coding. Answers to the question how much does it cost to become a medical coder show that certificate programs are surprisingly affordable and can be completed quickly.

Exploring related programs online can help you find a flexible and affordable pathway to join the ever-growing healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Nancy L. Keating

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles