World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Italy
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
162
Citations
112086
World Ranking
705
National Ranking
20

Francesco Montorsi publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francesco Montorsi sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,725 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Francesco Montorsi D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francesco Montorsi sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 162 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Italy Leader Award

Overview

Francesco Montorsi is affiliated with Vita-Salute San Raffaele University in Italy. Their research output spans a broad range of topics primarily within medicine, with significant contributions to surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, urology, oncology, and molecular biology. Montorsi's research extensively covers specific areas including bladder and urothelial cancer treatments, prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment, urinary and genital oncology, prostate cancer research and treatment, renal cell carcinoma treatment, urological disorders, and urologic and reproductive health conditions.

Their recent publications reflect a focus on clinical and pathological outcomes in urological and inflammatory diseases. Notable papers include:

  • Interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 inhibition compared with standard management in patients with COVID-19 and hyperinflammation: a cohort study, 2021, The Lancet Rheumatology
  • Impact of Molecular Subtyping and Immune Infiltration on Pathological Response and Outcome Following Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer, 2020, European Urology
  • Positive Predictive Value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, 2020, European Urology Oncology
  • Severely low testosterone in males with COVID-19: A case-control study, 2021, Andrology
  • A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on the Impact of Proficiency-based Progression Simulation Training on Performance Outcomes, 2020, Annals of Surgery

Montorsi has worked closely with multiple co-authors, often collaborating with:

  • Alberto Briganti
  • Andrea Salonia
  • Umberto Capitanio
  • Giorgio Gandaglia
  • Andrea Necchi

The frequent publication venues for Montorsi's work include:

  • World Journal of Urology
  • European Urology
  • European Urology Oncology
  • European Urology Focus
  • Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations

Montorsi's research integrates clinical studies and systematic reviews, contributing to understanding disease mechanisms, treatment responses, and diagnostic tools particularly in urological cancers and related fields. Their involvement in multidisciplinary studies highlights connections between inflammation, cancer progression, and patient outcomes.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines on male sexual dysfunction: erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation.

    Konstantinos Hatzimouratidis;Edouard Amar;Ian Eardley;Francois Giuliano

  • Effect of dutasteride on the risk of prostate cancer.

    Gerald L. Andriole;David G. Bostwick;Otis W. Brawley;Leonard G. Gomella

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

    Vincenzo Ficarra;Giacomo Novara;Raymond C. Rosen;Walter Artibani

  • Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis of Comparative Studies

    Vincenzo Ficarra;Giacomo Novara;Walter Artibani;Andrea Cestari

  • Summary of the recommendations on sexual dysfunctions in men

    Francesco Montorsi;Ganesan Adaikan;Edgardo Becher;Francois Giuliano

  • The Effects of Combination Therapy with Dutasteride and Tamsulosin on Clinical Outcomes in Men with Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: 4-Year Results from the CombAT Study

    Claus G. Roehrborn;Paul Siami;Jack Barkin;Ronaldo Damião

  • Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies Reporting Potency Rates After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy

    Vincenzo Ficarra;Giacomo Novara;Thomas E. Ahlering;Anthony Costello

  • Meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement

    Sascha A. Ahyai;Peter Gilling;Steven A. Kaplan;Rainer M. Kuntz

  • The Premature Ejaculation Prevalence and Attitudes (PEPA) Survey: Prevalence, Comorbidities, and Professional Help-Seeking

    Hartmut Porst;Francesco Montorsi;Raymond C. Rosen;Lisa Gaynor

  • Distribution of metastatic sites in renal cell carcinoma: a population-based analysis

    M. Bianchi;M. Sun;C. Jeldres;S. F. Shariat

  • Updated Nomogram Predicting Lymph Node Invasion in Patients with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: The Essential Importance of Percentage of Positive Cores

    Alberto Briganti;Alessandro Larcher;Firas Abdollah;Umberto Capitanio

  • A Critical Analysis of the Current Knowledge of Surgical Anatomy Related to Optimization of Cancer Control and Preservation of Continence and Erection in Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy

    Jochen Walz;Arthur L. Burnett;Anthony J. Costello;James A. Eastham

  • Sexual Dysfunction and Cardiac Risk (the Second Princeton Consensus Conference)

    J. B. Kostis;G. Jackson;R. Rosen;E. Barrett-Connor

  • Pembrolizumab as neoadjuvant therapy before radical cystectomy in patients with muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma (PURE-01): An open-label, single-arm, phase II study

    Andrea Necchi;Andrea Anichini;Daniele Raggi;Alberto Briganti

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

    Giacomo Novara;Vincenzo Ficarra;Raymond C. Rosen;Walter Artibani

  • Erectile dysfunction prevalence, time of onset and association with risk factors in 300 consecutive patients with acute chest pain and angiographically documented coronary artery disease.

    Francesco Montorsi;Alberto Briganti;Andrea Salonia;Patrizio Rigatti

  • Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies Reporting Oncologic Outcome After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy

    Giacomo Novara;Vincenzo Ficarra;Simone Mocellin;Thomas E. Ahlering

  • RECOVERY OF SPONTANEOUS ERECTILE FUNCTION AFTER NERVE-SPARING RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY WITH AND WITHOUT EARLY INTRACAVERNOUS INJECTIONS OF ALPROSTADIL: RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL

    Francesco Montorsi;Giorgio Guazzoni Luigi;Luigi Ferini Strambi;Luigi F. Da Pozzo

  • Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer

    Alberto Briganti;Michael L. Blute;James H. Eastham;Markus Graefen

  • EAU Guidelines on Erectile Dysfunction: An Update

    Eric Wespes;Edouard Amar;Dimitrios Hatzichristou;Kosta Hatzimouratidis

Frequent Co-Authors

Alberto Briganti
Alberto Briganti Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Andrea Salonia
Andrea Salonia Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Pierre I. Karakiewicz
Pierre I. Karakiewicz University of Montreal
Shahrokh F. Shariat
Shahrokh F. Shariat Medical University of Vienna
Patrizio Rigatti
Patrizio Rigatti Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Giorgio Gandaglia
Giorgio Gandaglia Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Nazareno Suardi
Nazareno Suardi University of Genoa
Markus Graefen
Markus Graefen Universität Hamburg
Giorgio Guazzoni
Giorgio Guazzoni Humanitas University
Maxine Sun
Maxine Sun Harvard Medical School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in the medical field doesn’t always mean you have to start with a traditional four-year medical school route. There are several flexible, online pathways that can lead to rewarding roles in healthcare. For registered nurses looking to advance, the rn to bsn online without clinicals option can help nurses earn a bachelor’s degree without additional on-site requirements.

If you’re ready to pursue leadership or advanced practice nursing, consider exploring dnp programs online or opt for the easiest dnp program online for a streamlined experience. These doctor of nursing practice programs are designed to fit busy schedules, sometimes offering accelerated or less intensive formats for quicker advancement.

Those looking to enter the workforce quickly might be interested in an accelerated lpn program, which offers a faster track to becoming a licensed practical nurse. Each of these online programs can play a valuable role on your path to a career in medicine, providing different levels of responsibility, patient interaction, and advancement opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Francesco Montorsi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles