What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Ecology
- Statistics
- Ecosystem
Ulf Dieckmann mainly investigates Ecology, Evolutionary biology, Fishing, Natural selection and Phenotypic plasticity.
His Ecology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Evolutionary dynamics, Evolutionary suicide and Selection.
His study in Evolutionary biology is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Quantitative genetics, Ecological speciation, Sympatric speciation and Incipient speciation.
His Sympatric speciation study incorporates themes from Disruptive selection and Assortative mating.
To a larger extent, Ulf Dieckmann studies Fishery with the aim of understanding Fishing.
His research integrates issues of Sexual maturity, Probabilistic logic and Growth rate in his study of Phenotypic plasticity.
His most cited work include:
- On the origin of species by sympatric speciation (1383 citations)
- Hybridization and speciation (1223 citations)
- The dynamical theory of coevolution: a derivation from stochastic ecological processes (900 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary scientific interests are in Ecology, Evolutionary biology, Fishing, Fishery and Phenotypic plasticity.
Ulf Dieckmann works mostly in the field of Ecology, limiting it down to concerns involving Evolutionary dynamics and, occasionally, Evolutionary ecology.
His Evolutionary biology research includes themes of Mathematical and theoretical biology, Disruptive selection, Sympatric speciation and Incipient speciation.
The various areas that Ulf Dieckmann examines in his Incipient speciation study include Allopatric speciation and Ecological speciation.
His work carried out in the field of Fishing brings together such families of science as Gadus and Atlantic cod.
His study of Fisheries management is a part of Fishery.
He most often published in these fields:
- Ecology (53.52%)
- Evolutionary biology (21.67%)
- Fishing (13.32%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?
- Ecology (53.52%)
- Systemic risk (4.44%)
- Climate change (4.70%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of study are Ecology, Systemic risk, Climate change, Ecosystem and Fishing.
His work often combines Ecology and Biological sciences studies.
Ulf Dieckmann combines subjects such as Incentive, Matching, Greenhouse gas and International economics with his study of Climate change.
His studies in Ecosystem integrate themes in fields like Biodiversity, Spatial heterogeneity, Ecology and Environmental resource management.
His Fishing research incorporates themes from Population size and North sea.
His Fishery study combines topics in areas such as Gadus, Climate model, Freshwater ecosystem and Global warming, Effects of global warming.
Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Complexity and stability of ecological networks: a review of the theory (89 citations)
- Vulnerability to shocks in the global seafood trade network (45 citations)
- Multitrait successional forest dynamics enable diverse competitive coexistence (43 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Ecology
- Statistics
- Ecosystem
His scientific interests lie mostly in Ecology, Ecosystem, Environmental resource management, Fishery and Habitat.
His studies deal with areas such as Pleuronectes and North sea as well as Ecology.
He interconnects Spatial heterogeneity and Recreational fishing in the investigation of issues within Ecosystem.
He usually deals with Environmental resource management and limits it to topics linked to Ecological network and Biodiversity, Psychological resilience, Ecology and Complex network.
The Fishery study combines topics in areas such as Phenotypic plasticity, Density dependence, Arctic and Time series.
In general Habitat study, his work on Habitat destruction often relates to the realm of Single site, thereby connecting several areas of interest.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
