World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 56 1930 1746 342 309 212 8478

Sarah Peters publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sarah Peters between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sarah Peters published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2024. 40 of the 308 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2024. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 24 publications 2025: 16 publications
1992 2025

308 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sarah Peters: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 1
1994 1
1995 0
1996 2
1997 0
1998 3
1999 3
2000 3
2001 2
2002 3
2003 1
2004 1
2005 3
2006 5
2007 10
2008 8
2009 14
2010 15
2011 19
2012 5
2013 14
2014 7
2015 11
2016 18
2017 19
2018 17
2019 20
2020 15
2021 18
2022 15
2023 14
2024 24
2025 16
Total 308
Download as CSV

Sarah Peters publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah Peters sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 204–213 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 212 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285 212
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Sarah Peters D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah Peters sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109 56
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Sarah Peters is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple areas within medicine and psychology, focusing heavily on clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, as well as public health and pediatric health.

Their work frequently addresses topics such as schizophrenia research and treatment, suicide and self-harm studies, psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, pediatric pain management techniques, radiation therapy and dosimetry, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, and issues related to obesity, physical activity, and diet.

Notable recent papers include:

  • Factors influencing health behaviour change during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-synthesis, 2021, published in Health Psychology Review
  • Antipsychotic medication versus psychological intervention versus a combination of both in adolescents with first-episode psychosis (MAPS): a multicentre, three-arm, randomised controlled pilot and feasibility study, 2020, published in The Lancet Psychiatry
  • From Self-Esteem to Selflessness: An Evidence (Gap) Map of Self-Related Processes as Mechanisms of Mindfulness-Based Interventions, 2021, published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • Recovery from postpartum psychosis: a systematic review and metasynthesis of women's and families' experiences, 2020, published in Archives of Women's Mental Health
  • Understanding pregnancy as a teachable moment for behaviour change: a comparison of the COM-B and teachable moments models, 2021, published in Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine

Sarah Peters has collaborated extensively with several researchers, including Patricia Gooding, Gillian Haddock, Kamelia Harris, Wendy Jones, and Beate Timmermann. Coauthorship counts indicate sustained scientific partnerships.

Their publications have appeared predominantly in venues such as BMC Psychiatry, Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, Health Expectations, and Annals of Oncology. These journals reflect a focus on psychiatric conditions, psychotherapy, rheumatic and chronic diseases, patient expectations, and oncology-related research.

The main fields of study covered by their research are Medicine, with 141 publications, and Psychology, with 51 publications. Subfields include Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health.

Best Publications

  • Patients' perceptions of medical explanations for somatisation disorders: qualitative analysis.

    Peter Salmon;Sarah Peters;Ian Stanley

  • Patients with medically unexplained symptoms: sources of patients' authority and implications for demands on medical care.

    Sarah Peters;Ian Stanley;Michael Rose;Peter Salmon

  • Patterns of genome evolution that have accompanied host adaptation in Salmonella.

    Gemma C. Langridge;Maria Fookes;Thomas R. Connor;Theresa Feltwell

  • What Do Patients Choose to Tell Their Doctors? Qualitative Analysis of Potential Barriers to Reattributing Medically Unexplained Symptoms

    Sarah Peters;Anne Rogers;Peter Salmon;Linda Gask

  • Access to primary mental health care for hard-to-reach groups: From 'silent suffering' to 'making it work'

    Marija Kovandžić;Carolyn Chew-Graham;Joanne L. Reeve;Suzanne Edwards

  • Genomic signatures of human and animal disease in the zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus suis

    Lucy A. Weinert;Roy R. Chaudhuri;Jinhong Wang;Sarah E. Peters

  • Psychosocial interventions for the management of chronic orofacial pain.

    Vishal R Aggarwal;Karina Lovell;Sarah Peters;Hanieh Javidi

  • Short sleep duration and poor sleep quality predict next-day suicidal ideation: an ecological momentary assessment study.

    Donna L Littlewood;Simon D Kyle;Lesley-Anne Carter;Sarah Peters

  • Expressed emotion, attributions and depression in mothers of children with problem behaviour.

    Catherine Bolton;Rachel Calam;Christine Barrowclough;Sarah Peters

  • Disorganized attachment representation and atypical parenting in young school age children with externalizing disorder

    Jonathan Green;Charlie Stanley;Sarah Peters

  • Qualitative Research Methods in Mental Health

    Sarah Peters

  • Why do General Practitioners Decline Training to Improve Management of Medically Unexplained Symptoms

    Peter Salmon;Sarah E. Peters;Rebecca Clifford;Wendy Iredale

  • Peering through the barriers in GPs' explanations for declining to participate in research: the role of professional autonomy and the economy of time

    Peter Salmon;Sarah Peters;Anne Rogers;Linda Gask

  • Maternal attributions and expressed emotion as predictors of attendance at parent management training

    Sarah Peters;Rachel Calam;Richard Harrington

  • Cluster randomised controlled trial of training practices in reattribution for medically unexplained symptoms.

    Richard Morriss;Christopher Dowrick;Peter Salmon;Sarah Peters

  • Nurse led, home based self help treatment for patients in primary care with chronic fatigue syndrome: randomised controlled trial

    Alison J Wearden;Christopher Dowrick;Carolyn Chew-Graham;Richard P Bentall

  • Reattribution reconsidered: Narrative review and reflections on an educational intervention for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care settings

    Linda Gask;Christopher Dowrick;Christopher Dowrick;Christopher Dowrick;Peter Salmon;Peter Salmon;Peter Salmon;Sarah Peters;Sarah Peters;Sarah Peters

  • Randomised comparison of the effectiveness and costs of community and hospital based mental health services for children with behavioural disorders.

    Richard Harrington;Sarah Peters;Jonathan Green;Sarah Byford

  • General practitioners' views on reattribution for patients with medically unexplained symptoms: a questionnaire and qualitative study

    Christopher Dowrick;Linda Gask;John G Hughes;Huw Charles-Jones

  • Making the diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalitis in primary care: a qualitative study

    Carolyn Chew-Graham;Christopher Dowrick;Alison Wearden;Victoria Richardson

  • Does health coaching improve health-related quality of life and reduce hospital admissions in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Hannah Long;Kelly Howells;Sarah Peters;Amy Blakemore

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Morriss
Richard Morriss University of Nottingham
Duncan J. Maskell
Duncan J. Maskell University of Melbourne
Patricia A. Gooding
Patricia A. Gooding University of Manchester
Peter Salmon
Peter Salmon University of Liverpool
Alison Wearden
Alison Wearden University of Manchester
Gillian Haddock
Gillian Haddock Manchester Academic Health Science Centre
Brendan W. Wren
Brendan W. Wren London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Paul R. Langford
Paul R. Langford Imperial College London
Linda Gask
Linda Gask University of Manchester
Daniel Pratt
Daniel Pratt University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Social Sciences or Humanities opens up a variety of fulfilling pathways. Many students are now exploring online options to start or further their careers, especially in fields like counseling, therapy, psychology, and social work. With flexible online programs, it’s easier to balance studies with work or personal commitments.

For those interested in counseling, finding the cheapest CACREP-accredited programs online can be a cost-effective way to start your journey toward licensure. If your passion is helping families, there are excellent online marriage and family therapy masters programs that provide crucial skills for working with couples and families in various settings.

Psychology remains one of the most popular majors, and understanding psychology degree cost can help you make informed decisions about your educational investments. Furthermore, social work is a growing field, and exploring the MSW programs that are accessible and flexible can open doors to broad career options in community organizations, healthcare, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Sarah Peters

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles