World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 62 3564 3261 318 288 209 12192

Uta Noppeney publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Uta Noppeney between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Uta Noppeney published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 8.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2012. 8 of the 219 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2012. 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 1 publication
1999 2025

219 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Uta Noppeney: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 3
2000 3
2001 6
2002 6
2003 6
2004 11
2005 3
2006 10
2007 7
2008 12
2009 12
2010 13
2011 14
2012 16
2013 9
2014 7
2015 7
2016 12
2017 4
2018 9
2019 7
2020 9
2021 11
2022 5
2023 9
2024 7
2025 1
Total 219
Download as CSV

Uta Noppeney publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Uta Noppeney sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 208–217 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 209 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262 209
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Uta Noppeney D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Uta Noppeney sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260 62
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Uta Noppeney is affiliated with the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on areas within neuroscience and psychology, with a significant emphasis on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Their prominent research topics encompass multisensory perception and integration, olfactory and sensory function studies, visual perception and processing mechanisms, neural dynamics and brain function, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, color perception and design, and neuroscience and music perception.

Frequent collaborators include Samuel A. Jones, Rodika Sokoliuk, Giulio Degano, Lucía Melloni, and Damian Cruse. This network reflects interdisciplinary approaches in exploring sensory and cognitive processes.

Uta Noppeney has published extensively in several venues, with repeated contributions to bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), PLoS Biology, eLife, Journal of Vision, and Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. They have contributed notably to the following papers:

  • Perceptual Inference, Learning, and Attention in a Multisensory World, 2021, Annual Review of Neuroscience
  • Resolving multisensory and attentional influences across cortical depth in sensory cortices, 2020, eLife
  • The role of alpha oscillations in temporal binding within and across the senses, 2022, Nature Human Behaviour
  • Covert Speech Comprehension Predicts Recovery From Acute Unresponsive States, 2020, Annals of Neurology
  • Ageing and multisensory integration: A review of the evidence, and a computational perspective, 2021, Cortex

The scholar's interdisciplinary research bridges neural mechanisms underlying sensory integration with cognitive processes such as attention and learning. Their work on perceptual inference and multisensory attention contributes to understanding how the brain combines information from different sensory modalities.

Studies on ageing and multisensory integration highlight computational perspectives and evidence relevant to age-related changes in sensory processing. The exploration of neural oscillations further informs temporal binding mechanisms within and across sensory systems.

Their research output encompasses both theoretical and applied dimensions of neuroscience, incorporating behavioral and electrophysiological methodologies to investigate sensory and cognitive functions.

Best Publications

  • Neurolinguistics: structural plasticity in the bilingual brain.

    Andrea Mechelli;Jenny T. Crinion;Uta Noppeney;John O'Doherty

  • Language Control in the Bilingual Brain

    J. Crinion;Robert Turner;A. Grogan;T. Hanakawa

  • Hemispheric asymmetries in language-related pathways: A combined functional MRI and tractography study

    H. W. Robert Powell;Geoffrey J. M. Parker;Daniel C. Alexander;Mark R. Symms

  • Cortical hierarchies perform Bayesian causal inference in multisensory perception.

    Tim Rohe;Uta Noppeney

  • Retrieval of abstract semantics

    Uta Noppeney;Cathy J Price

  • Anterior temporal cortex and semantic memory : Reconciling findings from neuropsychology and functional imaging

    Timothy T. Rogers;Julia Hocking;Uta Noppeney;Andrea Mechelli

  • Two Distinct Neural Mechanisms for Category-selective Responses

    Uta Noppeney;Cathy J. Price;Will D. Penny;Karl J. Friston

  • Distinct Functional Contributions of Primary Sensory and Association Areas to Audiovisual Integration in Object Categorization

    Sebastian Werner;Uta Noppeney

  • Early visual deprivation induces structural plasticity in gray and white matter

    Uta Noppeney;Karl J. Friston;John Ashburner;Richard Frackowiak

  • Superadditive Responses in Superior Temporal Sulcus Predict Audiovisual Benefits in Object Categorization

    Sebastian Werner;Uta Noppeney

  • Temporal lobe lesions and semantic impairment: a comparison of herpes simplex virus encephalitis and semantic dementia

    Uta Noppeney;Karalyn Patterson;Lorraine K. Tyler;Helen Moss

  • Long-term music training tunes how the brain temporally binds signals from multiple senses

    HweeLing Lee;Uta Noppeney

  • Audiovisual Synchrony Improves Motion Discrimination via Enhanced Connectivity between Early Visual and Auditory Areas

    Richard Lewis;Uta Noppeney

  • The Effect of Prior Visual Information on Recognition of Speech and Sounds

    Uta Noppeney;Oliver Josephs;Julia Hocking;Cathy J. Price

  • A Dynamic Causal Modeling Study on Category Effects: Bottom–Up or Top–Down Mediation?

    Andrea Mechelli;Cathy J. Price;Uta Noppeney;Karl J. Friston

  • Anatomic constraints on cognitive theories of category specificity

    Joseph T. Devlin;C. J. Moore;C. J. Moore;C. J. Mummery;Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini

  • An fMRI Study of Syntactic Adaptation

    U. Noppeney;C. J. Price

  • Retrieval of Visual, Auditory, and Abstract Semantics

    Uta Noppeney;Cathy J. Price

  • The effects of visual deprivation on functional and structural organization of the human brain.

    Uta Noppeney

  • The neural dynamics of hierarchical Bayesian causal inference in multisensory perception.

    Tim Rohe;Ann-Christine Ehlis;Uta Noppeney

  • Degenerate neuronal systems sustaining cognitive functions

    Uta Noppeney;Karl J. Friston;Cathy J. Price

Frequent Co-Authors

Cathy J. Price
Cathy J. Price University College London
Karl J. Friston
Karl J. Friston University College London
Axel Thielscher
Axel Thielscher Technical University of Denmark
Robert Turner
Robert Turner Max Planck Society
Pierre-Louis Bazin
Pierre-Louis Bazin University of Amsterdam
Oliver Stegle
Oliver Stegle German Cancer Research Center
Joseph T. Devlin
Joseph T. Devlin University College London
Heinrich H. Bülthoff
Heinrich H. Bülthoff Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Martin A. Giese
Martin A. Giese University of Tübingen
Glyn W. Humphreys
Glyn W. Humphreys University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in neuroscience, there are several related online degrees and career pathways you may want to consider. Many students explore psychology and counseling as complimentary or alternative fields, as they offer valuable insights into human behavior and mental health.

For those seeking a fast-tracked option, an accelerated psychology degree online can lead to early career entry in research, mental health, and related areas. Others may lean toward social services, and a social work accelerated program is designed for those who want to quickly gain practical skills to support communities.

Counseling is another strong pathway for neuroscience majors. Students often look for the CACREP schools accreditation when choosing counseling programs since it is recognized as a mark of quality and can impact licensure options. For affordability, many seek the cheapest master's in counseling online to reduce student debt while preparing for professional practice.

Whether your interest lies in neuroscience, psychology, social work, or counseling, these online programs offer flexible routes to impactful and meaningful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Uta Noppeney

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles