World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
62
Citations
14994
World Ranking
3503
National Ranking
23

Axel Thielscher publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Axel Thielscher sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 260 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Axel Thielscher D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Axel Thielscher sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Axel Thielscher is affiliated with the Technical University of Denmark. Their research spans multiple areas within neuroscience and medicine, focusing particularly on brain stimulation and neuroimaging techniques.

The main fields of study in their work are Neuroscience and Medicine, with numerous contributions also in subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

Thielscher's research topics cover a range of specialized subjects such as:

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Muscle activation and electromyography studies

The scientist has published extensively in several prominent academic venues, including:

  • Brain Stimulation
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • NeuroImage
  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Some of the recent publications authored or co-authored by Axel Thielscher include:

  • "Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: What is stimulated? - A consensus and critical position paper," 2022, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • "SynthSeg: Segmentation of brain MRI scans of any contrast and resolution without retraining," 2023, Medical Image Analysis
  • "Accurate and robust whole-head segmentation from magnetic resonance images for individualized head modeling," 2020, NeuroImage
  • "Guidelines for TMS/tES clinical services and research through the COVID-19 pandemic," 2020, Brain Stimulation
  • "Concurrent TMS-fMRI for causal network perturbation and proof of target engagement," 2021, NeuroImage

Frequent collaborators in the scientist's research include:

  • Hartwig R. Siebner
  • Oula Puonti
  • Kristoffer H. Madsen
  • Lars G. Hanson
  • Torge Worbs

Best Publications

  • Simultaneous PET-MRI: a new approach for functional and morphological imaging

    Martin S. Judenhofer;Hans F. Wehrl;Danny F. Newport;Ciprian Catana

  • Field modeling for transcranial magnetic stimulation: A useful tool to understand the physiological effects of TMS?

    Axel Thielscher;Andre Antunes;Guilherme B Saturnino

  • Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation

    Alexander Opitz;Alexander Opitz;Alexander Opitz;Walter Paulus;Susanne Will;Andre Antunes

  • Motor thresholds in humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study comparing different pulse waveforms, current directions and stimulator types

    Thomas Kammer;Sandra Beck;Axel Thielscher;Ulrike Laubis-Herrmann

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: What is stimulated? – A consensus and critical position paper

    Unknown

  • Electric field calculations in brain stimulation based on finite elements: an optimized processing pipeline for the generation and usage of accurate individual head models.

    Mirko Windhoff;Alexander Opitz;Axel Thielscher

  • Impact of the gyral geometry on the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Axel Thielscher;Alexander Opitz;Mirko Windhoff

  • Combining non-invasive transcranial brain stimulation with neuroimaging and electrophysiology: Current approaches and future perspectives

    Til Ole Bergmann;Til Ole Bergmann;Anke N. Karabanov;Gesa Hartwigsen;Gesa Hartwigsen;Axel Thielscher;Axel Thielscher

  • How the brain tissue shapes the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

    Alexander Opitz;Mirko Windhoff;Robin M. Heidemann;Robert Turner

  • Electric field properties of two commercial figure-8 coils in TMS: calculation of focality and efficiency.

    Axel Thielscher;Thomas Kammer

  • The non-transcranial TMS-evoked potential is an inherent source of ambiguity in TMS-EEG studies

    Virginia Conde;Leo Tomasevic;Irina Akopian;Konrad Stanek

  • Spatiotemporal structure of intracranial electric fields induced by transcranial electric stimulation in humans and nonhuman primates.

    Alexander Opitz;Alexander Opitz;Arnaud Falchier;Chao Gan Yan;Chao Gan Yan;Erin M. Yeagle

  • SimNIBS 2.1: A Comprehensive Pipeline for Individualized Electric Field Modelling for Transcranial Brain Stimulation

    Guilherme B. Saturnino;Guilherme B. Saturnino;Oula Puonti;Jesper D Nielsen;Jesper D Nielsen;Daria Antonenko

  • Automatic skull segmentation from MR images for realistic volume conductor models of the head: Assessment of the state-of-the-art.

    Jesper Duemose Nielsen;Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen;Oula Puonti;Hartwig R. Siebner

  • On the importance of electrode parameters for shaping electric field patterns generated by tDCS

    Guilherme B. Saturnino;André Antunes;Axel Thielscher

  • Linking physics with physiology in TMS: A sphere field model to determine the cortical stimulation site in TMS

    Axel Thielscher;Thomas Kammer

  • The navigation of transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Uwe Herwig;Carlos Schönfeldt-Lecuona;Arthur P. Wunderlich;Cyrill von Tiesenhausen

  • Accurate and robust whole-head segmentation from magnetic resonance images for individualized head modeling.

    Oula Puonti;Oula Puonti;Koen Van Leemput;Koen Van Leemput;Guilherme B Saturnino;Guilherme B Saturnino;Hartwig R Siebner;Hartwig R Siebner

  • Neural Correlates of Perceptual Choice and Decision Making during Fear–Disgust Discrimination

    Axel Thielscher;Luiz Pessoa

  • A novel approach to localize cortical TMS effects

    Konstantin Weise;Ole Numssen;Axel Thielscher;Gesa Hartwigsen

  • Where does TMS Stimulate the Motor Cortex? Combining Electrophysiological Measurements and Realistic Field Estimates to Reveal the Affected Cortex Position.

    Andreas Bungert;André Antunes;Svenja Espenhahn;Svenja Espenhahn;Axel Thielscher;Axel Thielscher;Axel Thielscher

  • Disrupting Parietal Function Prolongs Dominance Durations in Binocular Rivalry

    Natalia Zaretskaya;Axel Thielscher;Nikos K. Logothetis;Nikos K. Logothetis;Andreas Bartels;Andreas Bartels

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander Opitz
Alexander Opitz University of Minnesota
Klaus Scheffler
Klaus Scheffler Max Planck Society
Heinrich H. Bülthoff
Heinrich H. Bülthoff Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Gesa Hartwigsen
Gesa Hartwigsen Max Planck Society
Thomas R. Knösche
Thomas R. Knösche Max Planck Society
Til Ole Bergmann
Til Ole Bergmann University of Tübingen
Uta Noppeney
Uta Noppeney University of Birmingham
Thomas Kammer
Thomas Kammer University of Ulm
Kamil Ugurbil
Kamil Ugurbil University of Minnesota
Hyunjoo Lee
Hyunjoo Lee Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Axel Thielscher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles