World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Klaus Scheffler

Klaus Scheffler

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
79
Citations
19918
World Ranking
1704
National Ranking
156

Klaus Scheffler publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Scheffler sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 774 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Klaus Scheffler D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Scheffler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Processing of Temporal Unpredictability in Human and Animal Amygdala

    Cyril Herry;Dominik R. Bach;Fabrizio Esposito;Francesco Di Salle

  • Cortical and subcortical correlates of electroencephalographic alpha rhythm modulation

    Bernd Feige;Klaus Scheffler;Fabrizio Esposito;Francesco Di Salle

  • Signal-to-noise ratio and MR tissue parameters in human brain imaging at 3, 7, and 9.4 tesla using current receive coil arrays.

    Rolf Pohmann;Oliver Speck;Klaus Scheffler;Klaus Scheffler

  • Neural correlates of antinociception in borderline personality disorder.

    Christian Schmahl;Martin Bohus;Fabrizio Esposito;Rolf-Detlef Treede

  • Multiecho sequences with variable refocusing flip angles: Optimization of signal behavior using smooth transitions between pseudo steady states (TRAPS)

    Juergen Hennig;Matthias Weigel;Klaus Scheffler

  • Auditory cortical responses in hearing subjects and unilateral deaf patients as detected by functional magnetic resonance imaging.

    K Scheffler;D Bilecen;N Schmid;K Tschopp

  • Is TrueFISP a gradient-echo or a spin-echo sequence?

    Klaus Scheffler;Jürgen Hennig

  • Magnetization preparation during the steady state: fat-saturated 3D TrueFISP.

    Klaus Scheffler;Oliver Heid;Jürgen Hennig

  • T1 quantification with inversion recovery TrueFISP

    Klaus Scheffler;Jürgen Hennig

  • Spatiotemporal pattern of neural processing in the human auditory cortex.

    Erich Seifritz;Fabrizio Esposito;Franciszek Hennel;Henrietta Mustovic

  • A 16-channel dual-row transmit array in combination with a 31-element receive array for human brain imaging at 9.4 T

    Gunamony Shajan;Mikhail Kozlov;Jens Hoffmann;Robert Turner

  • Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex as detected by BOLD-FMRI.

    Deniz Bilecen;Klaus Scheffler;Nena Schmid;Kurt Tschopp

  • A pictorial description of steady-states in rapid magnetic resonance imaging

    Klaus Scheffler

  • Fast track to the neocortex: A memory engram in the posterior parietal cortex.

    Svenja Brodt;Svenja Brodt;Steffen Gais;Jonas Beck;Michael Erb

  • Rising Sound Intensity: An Intrinsic Warning Cue Activating the Amygdala

    Dominik R. Bach;Hartmut Schächinger;John G. Neuhoff;Fabrizio Esposito

  • Musical training induces functional plasticity in human hippocampus

    Marcus Herdener;Fabrizio Esposito;Francesco di Salle;Christian Boller

  • Neural Processing of Auditory Looming in the Human Brain

    Erich Seifritz;John G. Neuhoff;Deniz Bilecen;Klaus Scheffler

  • Cortical reorganization after acute unilateral hearing loss traced by fMRI

    D. Bilecen;E. Seifritz;E.W. Radü;N. Schmid

  • Quantitative magnetization transfer imaging using balanced SSFP

    M Gloor;K Scheffler;O Bieri

  • On the transient phase of balanced SSFP sequences

    Klaus Scheffler

  • Blood Oxygenation Level–Dependent Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Skeletal Muscle in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease

    Hans Peter Ledermann;Anja-Carina Schulte;Hanns-Georg Heidecker;Markus Aschwanden

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Erb
Michael Erb Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Jürgen Hennig
Jürgen Hennig University of Freiburg
Erich Seifritz
Erich Seifritz University of Zurich
Thomas Ethofer
Thomas Ethofer University of Tübingen
Axel Thielscher
Axel Thielscher Technical University of Denmark
Christoph Laske
Christoph Laske University of Tübingen
Wolfgang Grodd
Wolfgang Grodd Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Francesco Di Salle
Francesco Di Salle University of Salerno
Fabrizio Esposito
Fabrizio Esposito University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
Josef Priller
Josef Priller Charité - University Medicine Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in studying Neuroscience, there are several related online degrees that can open diverse career pathways in mental health, social services, and research. Many students combine neuroscience studies with a online psychology degree for a broader understanding of brain and behavior, which is valuable in both clinical and applied settings.

Those aiming to work as therapists or counselors may consider a specialized program such as marriage and family masters programs. These degrees prepare graduates for licensure and direct client work, focusing on relationships and family dynamics influenced by neurobiology.

Advancing your expertise with a masters in psychology can further enhance your qualifications for roles in research, education, or mental health services. Additionally, those interested in social advocacy and clinical support may find that a masters in social work online offers the necessary skills for community mental health and policy work.

Each of these online degree options is designed to be flexible, making it easier to balance your education with other commitments while preparing for impactful careers related to neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing Klaus Scheffler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles