World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 71 2403 2198 80 75 286 19280

David G. Norris publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David G. Norris between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David G. Norris published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 8 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2011. 27 of the 362 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2011. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 4 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 9 publications
1981 2025

362 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David G. Norris: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 1
1985 0
1986 2
1987 0
1988 2
1989 3
1990 1
1991 4
1992 2
1993 4
1994 6
1995 4
1996 2
1997 2
1998 7
1999 7
2000 5
2001 8
2002 9
2003 4
2004 8
2005 10
2006 5
2007 9
2008 10
2009 12
2010 14
2011 21
2012 17
2013 13
2014 8
2015 21
2016 18
2017 11
2018 17
2019 19
2020 12
2021 12
2022 6
2023 18
2024 18
2025 9
Total 362
Download as CSV

David G. Norris publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David G. Norris sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 278–287 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 286 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125 286
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

David G. Norris D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David G. Norris sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210 71
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

David G. Norris is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on medical and neuroscience fields, with particular emphasis on applications of advanced MRI techniques to study brain pathology and function.

Their recent published works cover cerebral small vessel disease and related neuroimaging methodologies. Notable papers include:

  • Perivascular Spaces, Diffusivity Along Perivascular Spaces, and Free Water in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease (2024) published in Neurology
  • Multi-shell Diffusion MRI Models for White Matter Characterization in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease (2020) published in Neurology
  • Cerebral Small Vessel Disease Progression and the Risk of Dementia: A 14-Year Follow-Up Study (2023) published in American Journal of Psychiatry
  • Determinants and Temporal Dynamics of Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: 14-Year Follow-Up (2022) published in Stroke
  • Structural network efficiency predicts cognitive decline in cerebral small vessel disease (2020) published in NeuroImage Clinical

The scientist frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • José P. Marques
  • Anil M. Tuladhar
  • Marco Duering
  • Frank-Erik de Leeuw
  • Mina A. Jacob

Their work appears consistently in venues dedicated to neuroimaging and cerebrovascular research. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics Biology and Medicine
  • Stroke
  • NeuroImage Clinical

David G. Norris's research spans multiple fields of study with a strong focus on Medicine and Neuroscience. Their subfield specializations include:

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neurology
  • Epidemiology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Key research topics covered in their publications are:

  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Best Publications

  • Biexponential diffusion attenuation in various states of brain tissue: implications for diffusion-weighted imaging.

    Thoralf Niendorf;Rick M. Dijkhuizen;David G. Norris;Menno van Lookeren Campagne

  • An investigation of functional and anatomical connectivity using magnetic resonance imaging.

    Martin A. Koch;David G. Norris;Margret Hund-Georgiadis

  • Simultaneous multislice (SMS) imaging techniques

    Markus Barth;Markus Barth;Felix Breuer;Peter J. Koopmans;Peter J. Koopmans;David G. Norris;David G. Norris;David G. Norris

  • Pros and cons of ultra-high-field MRI/MRS for human application.

    Mark E. Ladd;Peter Bachert;Peter Bachert;Martin Meyerspeer;Ewald Moser

  • Neuronal Dynamics Underlying High- and Low-Frequency EEG Oscillations Contribute Independently to the Human BOLD Signal

    René Scheeringa;René Scheeringa;Pascal Fries;Pascal Fries;Karl Magnus Petersson;Karl Magnus Petersson;Robert Oostenveld

  • BOLD contrast sensitivity enhancement and artifact reduction with multiecho EPI: Parallel-acquired inhomogeneity-desensitized fMRI

    Benedikt A. Poser;Maarten J. Versluis;Johannes M. Hoogduin;David G. Norris

  • Frontal theta EEG activity correlates negatively with the default mode network in resting state.

    René Scheeringa;Marcel C. M. Bastiaansen;Karl Magnus Petersson;Robert Oostenveld

  • Persistent schema-dependent hippocampal-neocortical connectivity during memory encoding and postencoding rest in humans

    Marlieke T. R. van Kesteren;Guillén Fernández;David G. Norris;Erno J. Hermans

  • Trial-by-trial coupling between EEG and BOLD identifies networks related to alpha and theta EEG power increases during working memory maintenance.

    René Scheeringa;Karl Magnus Petersson;Karl Magnus Petersson;Robert Oostenveld;David G. Norris

  • Selective Activation of the Deep Layers of the Human Primary Visual Cortex by Top-Down Feedback

    Peter Kok;Lauren J. Bains;Lauren J. Bains;Tim van Mourik;David G. Norris;David G. Norris;David G. Norris

  • Evolution of Regional Changes in Apparent Diffusion Coefficient during Focal Ischemia of Rat Brain: The Relationship of Quantitative Diffusion NMR Imaging to Reduction in Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolic Disturbances:

    Mathias Hoehn-Berlage;David G. Norris;Kanehisa Kohno;Günter Mies

  • Loss of white matter integrity is associated with gait disorders in cerebral small vessel disease

    Karlijn F de Laat;Anil M Tuladhar;Anouk G W van Norden;David G Norris

  • The effects of microscopic tissue parameters on the diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging experiment

    David G. Norris

  • Topographical Functional Connectivity Pattern in the Perisylvian Language Networks

    Hua-Dong Xiang;Hubert M. Fonteijn;Hubert M. Fonteijn;David G. Norris;Peter Hagoort

  • On the application of ultra‐fast rare experiments

    David G. Norris;Peter Börnert;Torsten Reese;Dieter Leibfritz

  • Principles of magnetic resonance assessment of brain function.

    David G. Norris

  • Layer-specific BOLD activation in human V1.

    Peter J. Koopmans;Markus Barth;Markus Barth;David G. Norris;David G. Norris

  • Occipital Alpha Activity during Stimulus Processing Gates the Information Flow to Object-Selective Cortex

    Johanna M. Zumer;René Scheeringa;Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen;David G. Norris

  • High field human imaging.

    David G. Norris

  • Reduced power multislice MDEFT imaging.

    David G. Norris

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Hagoort
Peter Hagoort Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Marcel P. Zwiers
Marcel P. Zwiers Radboud University
Dieter Leibfritz
Dieter Leibfritz University of Bremen
Roy P.C. Kessels
Roy P.C. Kessels Radboud University
Indira Tendolkar
Indira Tendolkar Radboud University
Floris P. de Lange
Floris P. de Lange Radboud University
Karl Magnus Petersson
Karl Magnus Petersson University of Algarve
Marcel C. M. Bastiaansen
Marcel C. M. Bastiaansen Tilburg University
Guillén Fernández
Guillén Fernández Radboud University
Robert Oostenveld
Robert Oostenveld Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring neuroscience majors often consider alternative or complementary career routes in mental health and counseling, which can be pursued through flexible online programs. If you want to combine neuroscience with client-facing roles, exploring the best online cacrep counseling programs is a great start. These programs meet rigorous accreditation standards and can prepare you for licensure in various counseling fields.

For those interested in affordable pathways, investigating the cheapest mental health counseling degree options online can help reduce financial barriers while still delivering quality training.

If your neuroscience interests focus on family dynamics and therapy, you may want to earn an lmft degree (Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist) through accessible online programs. This can open doors to specialized clinical practice with couples and families.

Finally, for a broad foundation in human behavior and mental processes, you might consider advancing with an online psychology graduate program. Researching how much does it cost to get a masters in psychology can help you budget effectively for your academic and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing David G. Norris

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles