World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert Oostenveld

Robert Oostenveld

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
78
Citations
55506
World Ranking
1720
National Ranking
56

Robert Oostenveld publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Oostenveld sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 214 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Robert Oostenveld D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Oostenveld sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert Oostenveld is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience and medicine, with significant contributions in subfields such as cognitive neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, neurology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

Oostenveld's recent publications include:

  • The Human Connectome Project: A retrospective (2021, NeuroImage)
  • Advances in human intracranial electroencephalography research, guidelines and good practices (2022, NeuroImage)
  • #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the replicability of influential EEG experiments (2021, Cortex)
  • A unified view on beamformers for M/EEG source reconstruction (2021, NeuroImage)
  • Enhancing reproducibility in developmental EEG research: BIDS, cluster-based permutation tests, and effect sizes (2021, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience)

The scientist frequently collaborates with Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen, Stefan Appelhoff, Cyril Pernet, Maria Carla Piastra, and Guiomar Niso.

Robert Oostenveld has published extensively in journals such as NeuroImage, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Scientific Data, Clinical Neurophysiology, and Imaging Neuroscience.

Their main fields of study reflect a focus on brain function and medical applications, with notable research topics including:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging

Best Publications

  • FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data

    Robert Oostenveld;Pascal Fries;Eric Maris;Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen

  • Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data

    Eric Maris;Robert Oostenveld

  • The Human Connectome Project: A data acquisition perspective

    D. C. Van Essen;Kamil Ugurbil;Edward J Auerbach

  • The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements

    Robert Oostenveld;Peter Praamstra

  • An improved index of phase-synchronization for electrophysiological data in the presence of volume-conduction, noise and sample-size bias.

    Martin A. Vinck;Robert Oostenveld;Marijn van Wingerden;Franscesco Battaglia

  • Modulation of neuronal interactions through neuronal synchronization

    Thilo Womelsdorf;Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen;Robert Oostenveld;Wolf Singer;Wolf Singer

  • Visual Areas Exert Feedforward and Feedback Influences through Distinct Frequency Channels

    André Moraes Bastos;André Moraes Bastos;André Moraes Bastos;Julien Vezoli;Conrado Arturo Bosman;Conrado Arturo Bosman;Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen

  • Increased auditory cortical representation in musicians

    Christo Pantev;Robert Oostenveld;Almut Engelien;Bernhard Ross

  • Prestimulus Oscillatory Activity in the Alpha Band Predicts Visual Discrimination Ability

    Hanneke van Dijk;Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen;Robert Oostenveld;Ole Jensen

  • Independent EEG sources are dipolar.

    Arnaud Delorme;Arnaud Delorme;Arnaud Delorme;Jason Palmer;Julie Onton;Robert Oostenveld

  • Theta and gamma oscillations predict encoding and retrieval of declarative memory.

    Daria Osipova;Atsuko Takashima;Robert Oostenveld;Guillén Fernández

  • Attentional stimulus selection through selective synchronization between monkey visual areas.

    Conrado A. Bosman;Conrado A. Bosman;Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen;Nicolas Brunet;Robert Oostenveld

  • Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research

    Joachim Gross;Sylvain Baillet;Gareth R. Barnes;Richard N. A. Henson

  • Lead-DBS v2: Towards a comprehensive pipeline for deep brain stimulation imaging.

    Andreas Horn;Ningfei Li;Till Anselm Dembek;Ari Kappel

  • Stress-Related Noradrenergic Activity Prompts Large-Scale Neural Network Reconfiguration

    Erno J. Hermans;Hein J. F. van Marle;Lindsey Ossewaarde;Marloes J. A. G. Henckens

  • EEG and MEG data analysis in SPM8.

    Vladimir Litvak;Jérémie Mattout;Stefan J. Kiebel;Christophe Phillips

  • Neuronal coherence as a mechanism of effective corticospinal interaction

    Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen;Robert Oostenveld;Robert Oostenveld;Pascal Fries

  • Neuronal Synchronization along the Dorsal Visual Pathway Reflects the Focus of Spatial Attention

    Markus Siegel;Markus Siegel;Markus Siegel;Tobias H. Donner;Tobias H. Donner;Tobias H. Donner;Robert Oostenveld;Pascal Fries

  • Tactile spatial attention enhances gamma-band activity in somatosensory cortex and reduces low-frequency activity in parieto-occipital areas

    Markus Bauer;Robert Oostenveld;Maarten Peeters;Pascal Fries

  • The Effects of Visual Stimulation and Selective Visual Attention on Rhythmic Neuronal Synchronization in Macaque Area V4

    Pascal Fries;Thilo Womelsdorf;Robert Oostenveld;Robert Desimone

Frequent Co-Authors

Pascal Fries
Pascal Fries Ernst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience
Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen
Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen Radboud University
Peter Hagoort
Peter Hagoort Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Arnaud Delorme
Arnaud Delorme University of California, San Diego
Peter Praamstra
Peter Praamstra Radboud University
Vladimir Litvak
Vladimir Litvak University College London
Peter De Weerd
Peter De Weerd Maastricht University
Marcel C. M. Bastiaansen
Marcel C. M. Bastiaansen Tilburg University
Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Lars Arendt-Nielsen Aalborg University
Karl Magnus Petersson
Karl Magnus Petersson University of Algarve

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in neuroscience, related online degree programs can expand your career options and complement your knowledge of the brain and behavior. Many students explore online social work programs to prepare for roles in clinical or community settings, where understanding neurological and psychological principles is essential.

Fast-tracking your education is also possible with accelerated psychology programs online, which can help you quickly build foundational knowledge for neuroscientific research or mental health fields. If counseling aligns with your goals, choosing from cacrep accredited programs online ensures your training meets recognized professional standards—crucial for future licensure and employment.

Cost is a key concern for many. You can find quality options among the cheapest counseling degree online programs without sacrificing accreditation or learning outcomes. Each of these pathways offers flexible, accessible, and well-recognized training for careers at the intersection of neuroscience, mental health, and community impact.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Oostenveld

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles