World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
44
Citations
8396
World Ranking
7125
National Ranking
197

Peter Praamstra publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Praamstra sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 92 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Peter Praamstra D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Praamstra sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Praamstra is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands. Their research is primarily situated within the fields of neuroscience and medicine, focusing on neurology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, physiology, cognitive neuroscience, and biomedical engineering.

The main topics of Peter Praamstra's work include:

  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Genetic neurodegenerative diseases
  • Parkinson's disease mechanisms and treatments
  • Neuroscience and neuropharmacology research
  • Hereditary neurological disorders
  • Neurological diseases and metabolism
  • Lysosomal storage disorders research

Peter Praamstra has authored several recent papers, with contributions spanning from 2020 to 2022. These include:

  • "The cerebral tremor circuit in a patient with Holmes tremor" (2020), published in Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
  • "A hereditary spastic paraplegia predominant phenotype caused by variants in the NEFL gene" (2020), published in Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
  • "Exploration of sensory-motor tradeoff behavior in Parkinson's disease" (2022), published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Peter Praamstra are:

  • Pepijn van den Munckhof
  • Samen Vinke
  • Rianne A.J. Esselink
  • Eva M. de Ronde
  • Mark L. Kuijf

Peter Praamstra's articles are published in specialized venues such as Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, and Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, reflecting a focus on clinical and human neuroscience research contexts.

Best Publications

  • The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements

    Robert Oostenveld;Peter Praamstra

  • Clinical and pathologic abnormalities in a family with parkinsonism and parkin gene mutations

    B.P.C. van de Warrenburg;M.M.Y. Lammens;C.B. Lucking;P. Denefle

  • Brain activity correlates differentially with increasing temporal complexity of rhythms during initialisation, synchronisation, and continuation phases of paced finger tapping

    Penelope A. Lewis;A. M. Wing;P. A. Pope;P. Praamstra

  • Neurophysiology of Implicit Timing in Serial Choice Reaction-Time Performance

    Peter Praamstra;Dimitrios Kourtis;Hoi Fei Kwok;Robert Oostenveld

  • Reliance on external cues for movement initiation in Parkinson's disease. Evidence from movement-related potentials.

    P. Praamstra;D.F. Stegeman;A.R. Cools;M.W.I.M. Horstink

  • Brain symmetry and topographic analysis of lateralized event-related potentials.

    Robert Oostenveld;Dick F. Stegeman;Peter Praamstra;Adriaan van Oosterom

  • Dipole source analysis suggests selective modulation of the supplementary motor area contribution to the readiness potential

    P. Praamstra;D.F. Stegeman;M.W.I.M. Horstink;A.R. Cools

  • Failed Suppression of Direct Visuomotor Activation in Parkinson's Disease

    P. Praamstra;F. M. Plat

  • Neurophysiological manifestations of phonological processing: Latency variation of a negative erp component timelocked to phonological mismatch

    Peter Praamstra;Antje S. Meyer;Willem J. M. Levelt

  • Frontoparietal Control of Spatial Attention and Motor Intention in Human EEG

    Peter Praamstra;Luc Boutsen;Glyn W. Humphreys

  • Phonological effects on the auditory N400 event-related brain potential.

    Peter Praamstra;Dick F. Stegeman

  • The Neurophysiology of Response Competition: Motor Cortex Activation and Inhibition following Subliminal Response Priming

    Peter Praamstra;Ellen Seiss

  • The basal ganglia and inhibitory mechanisms in response selection: evidence from subliminal priming of motor responses in Parkinson's disease.

    Ellen Seiss;Peter Praamstra

  • De novo gain-of-function and loss-of-function mutations of SCN8A in patients with intellectual disabilities and epilepsy

    Maxime G. Blanchard;Marjolein H. Willemsen;Jaclyn B. Walker;Sulayman D. Dib-Hajj

  • The contents of predictions in sentence comprehension: activation of the shape of objects before they are referred to.

    Joost Rommers;Antje S. Meyer;Antje S. Meyer;Peter Praamstra;Falk Huettig

  • A role of beta oscillatory synchrony in biasing response competition

    B.C.M. van Wijk;A. Daffertshofer;N. Roach;P. Praamstra

  • Comparing neural correlates of configural processing in faces and objects: An ERP study of the thatcher illusion

    Luc Boutsen;Glyn W. Humphreys;Peter Praamstra;Tracy Warbrick

  • Intermediate CAG repeat lengths (53,54) for MJD/SCA3 are associated with an abnormal phenotype.

    N van Alfen;Richard Sinke;M J Zwarts;A Gabreëls-Festen

  • Magnetic stimulation of the dorsal premotor cortex modulates the Simon effect.

    P. Praamstra;B.U. Kleine;A. Schnitzler

  • Proprioceptive sensory function in Parkinson's disease and Huntington's disease: evidence from proprioception-related EEG potentials.

    E Seiss;P Praamstra;CW Hesse;H Rickards

  • EVIDENCE FOR LATERAL PREMOTOR AND PARIETAL OVERACTIVITY IN PARKINSON'S DISEASE DURING SEQUENTIAL AND BIMANUAL MOVEMENTS. A PET STUDY

    P. Praamstra;D. F. Stegeman;A. R. Cools;Antje S. Meyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Dick F. Stegeman
Dick F. Stegeman Radboud University
Robert Oostenveld
Robert Oostenveld Radboud University
Alan M. Wing
Alan M. Wing University of Birmingham
Glyn W. Humphreys
Glyn W. Humphreys University of Oxford
W. Pieter Medendorp
W. Pieter Medendorp Radboud University
Tjeerd W. Boonstra
Tjeerd W. Boonstra Maastricht University
Willem J. M. Levelt
Willem J. M. Levelt Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Michael G. H. Coles
Michael G. H. Coles University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
R. C. Miall
R. C. Miall University of Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Peter Praamstra

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles