World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Walter Vandereycken

Walter Vandereycken

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
67
Citations
12185
World Ranking
2628
National Ranking
31

Walter Vandereycken publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Walter Vandereycken sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 342 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Walter Vandereycken D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Walter Vandereycken sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Walter Vandereycken is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium. Their academic profile is centered around research conducted within this institution.

No specific recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, fields or subfields of study, main topics of work, or awards are listed for Walter Vandereycken in the available data.

Best Publications

  • Gray's Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory as a framework for research on personality-psychopathology associations.

    Patricia Bijttebier;Ilse Beck;Laurence Claes;Walter Vandereycken

  • Psychological Aspects of Childhood Obesity: A Controlled Study in a Clinical and Nonclinical Sample

    Caroline Braet;Ivan Mervielde;Walter Vandereycken

  • The Body Attitude Test for Patients with an Eating Disorder: Psychometric Characteristics of a New Questionnaire

    Michel Probst;Walter Vandereycken;Herman Van Coppenolle;Johan Vanderlinden

  • The dissociation questionnaire (DIS-Q): Development and characteristics of a new self-report questionnaire

    Johan Vanderlinden;Richard Van Dyck;Walter Vandereycken;Hans Vertommen

  • Impulsiveness and lack of inhibitory control in eating disorders.

    Laurence Claes;Chantal Nederkoorn;Walter Vandereycken;Ramona Guerrieri

  • Self-injurious behavior: differential diagnosis and functional differentiation.

    Laurence Claes;Walter Vandereycken

  • Dissociative experiences and trauma in eating disorders.

    Johan Vanderlinden;Walter Vandereycken;Richard van Dyck;Hans Vertommen

  • Impulsivity-related traits in eating disorder patients

    Laurence Claes;Walter Vandereycken;Hans Vertommen

  • Brief report: the association between non-suicidal self-injury, self-concept and acquaintance with self-injurious peers in a sample of adolescents.

    Laurence Claes;Adinda Houben;Walter Vandereycken;Patricia Bijttebier

  • Self-injury in female versus male psychiatric patients: A comparison of characteristics, psychopathology and aggression regulation

    Laurence Claes;Walter Vandereycken;Hans Vertommen

  • Trauma, dissociation, and impulse dyscontrol in eating disorders

    Johan Vanderlinden;Walter Vandereycken

  • The affect-regulation function of nonsuicidal self-injury in eating-disordered patients: which affect states are regulated?

    Laurence Claes;E. David Klonsky;Jennifer Muehlenkamp;Peter Kuppens

  • Pimozide combined with behavior therapy in the short-term treatment of anorexia nervosa. A double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study.

    Walter Vandereycken;Roland Pierloot

  • Self-injurious behaviors in eating-disordered patients.

    Laurence Claes;Walter Vandereycken;Hans Vertommen

  • Eating‐disordered patients with and without self‐injurious behaviours: a comparison of psychopathological features

    Laurence Claes;Walter Vandereycken;Hans Vertommen

  • Media hype, diagnostic fad or genuine disorder? Professionals' opinions about night eating syndrome, orthorexia, muscle dysmorphia, and emetophobia.

    Walter Vandereycken

  • Impulsive and compulsive traits in eating disordered patients compared with controls

    Laurence Claes;Walter Vandereycken;Hans Vertommen

  • Comparison of non-suicidal self-injurious behavior and suicide attempts in patients admitted to a psychiatric crisis unit

    Laurence Claes;Jennifer Muehlenkamp;Jennifer Muehlenkamp;Walter Vandereycken;Luc Hamelinck

  • Motivation to change in eating disorder patients: a conceptual clarification on the basis of self-determination theory.

    Maarten Vansteenkiste;Bart Soenens;Walter Vandereycken

  • Non-suicidal self-injury in eating disordered patients: A test of a conceptual model

    Jennifer J. Muehlenkamp;Laurence Claes;Dirk Smits;Christine M. Peat

Frequent Co-Authors

Guido Pieters
Guido Pieters KU Leuven
Wouter Hulstijn
Wouter Hulstijn University of Antwerp
Bernard Sabbe
Bernard Sabbe University of Antwerp
Jennifer J. Muehlenkamp
Jennifer J. Muehlenkamp University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire
Bart Soenens
Bart Soenens Ghent University
Paul M. G. Emmelkamp
Paul M. G. Emmelkamp University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree online offers flexibility and accessibility, empowering students across the United States to match their studies with their personal and professional commitments. Many top-ranked programs provide robust online options, making it easier for students to start or advance their careers in this exciting field.

For students residing in New York, you may want to explore the best online psychology bachelor's degree rankings in New York to find programs recognized for quality and student outcomes. Similarly, those living in Pennsylvania should review the online psychology bachelor's programs in Pennsylvania to discover flexible degree options in their state. California also boasts a variety of top choices, so checking out available online psychology degrees in California is a smart step for West Coast students.

For those aspiring to advanced roles such as licensed psychologist or researcher, there are doctoral-level opportunities too. The best online doctorate in psychology degree programs ranking in America highlights reputable options for earning a prestigious doctorate from the comfort of your home.

Best Scientists Citing Walter Vandereycken

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles