World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Hans Vertommen

Hans Vertommen

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
5532
World Ranking
9826
National Ranking
140

Hans Vertommen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans Vertommen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 171 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Hans Vertommen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans Vertommen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hans Vertommen is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium, contributing to the academic community through research and collaboration. Their professional environment situates them within a well-established institution known for scientific inquiry and higher education.

Though specific details regarding research papers, co-authors, and publication venues are not available, Hans Vertommen maintains an active presence within the academic landscape at KU Leuven. The absence of detailed publication information suggests a focus that may not be centered on high-profile dissemination or that is emerging in its research output.

The available data does not specify particular fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work, indicating either a broad interdisciplinary approach or that detailed categorization of research interests has not been documented.

There are no noted book publications, awards, or citations connected to Hans Vertommen, which points to a profile where emphasis might be placed on teaching, internal collaboration, or other academic activities beyond widely recognized research metrics.

Overall, Hans Vertommen represents an academic figure engaged at KU Leuven whose detailed professional footprint through publications or accolades is not currently outlined in available records.

Best Publications

  • The dissociation questionnaire (DIS-Q): Development and characteristics of a new self-report questionnaire

    Johan Vanderlinden;Richard Van Dyck;Walter Vandereycken;Hans Vertommen

  • Impulsiveness and lack of inhibitory control in eating disorders.

    Laurence Claes;Chantal Nederkoorn;Walter Vandereycken;Ramona Guerrieri

  • Dissociative experiences and trauma in eating disorders.

    Johan Vanderlinden;Walter Vandereycken;Richard van Dyck;Hans Vertommen

  • Impulsivity-related traits in eating disorder patients

    Laurence Claes;Walter Vandereycken;Hans Vertommen

  • Victimization in chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia in tertiary care: a controlled study on prevalence and characteristics.

    Boudewijn Van Houdenhove;Eddy Neerinckx;Roeland Lysens;Hans Vertommen

  • Premorbid "overactive" lifestyle in chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia. An etiological factor or proof of good citizenship?

    Boudewijn Van Houdenhove;Eddy Neerinckx;Patrick Onghena;Roeland Lysens

  • Self-injury in female versus male psychiatric patients: A comparison of characteristics, psychopathology and aggression regulation

    Laurence Claes;Walter Vandereycken;Hans Vertommen

  • Self-report assessment of the DSM-IV personality disorders. Measurement of trait and distress characteristics: the ADP-IV

    Ckw Schotte;D de Doncker;C Vankerckhoven;Hans Vertommen

  • Self-injurious behaviors in eating-disordered patients.

    Laurence Claes;Walter Vandereycken;Hans Vertommen

  • Eating‐disordered patients with and without self‐injurious behaviours: a comparison of psychopathological features

    Laurence Claes;Walter Vandereycken;Hans Vertommen

  • Impulsive and compulsive traits in eating disordered patients compared with controls

    Laurence Claes;Walter Vandereycken;Hans Vertommen

  • Coping strategies in relation to personality disorders

    Patricia Bijttebier;Hans Vertommen

  • PERSONALITY PROTOTYPES IN EATING DISORDERS BASED ON THE BIG FIVE MODEL

    Laurence Claes;Walter Vandereycken;Patrick Luyten;Bart Soenens

  • Self-care versus self-harm: Piercing, tattooing, and self-injuring in eating disorders

    Laurence Claes;Laurence Claes;Walter Vandereycken;Hans Vertommen

  • Reliability and Validity of the Critical Care Family Needs Inventory in a Dutch-speaking Belgian sample

    Patricia Bijttebier;D Delva;S Vanoost;Herman Bobbaers

  • Coping with peer arguments in school-age children with bully/victim problems

    Patricia Bijttebier;Hans Vertommen

  • Psychometric properties of the Dickman Impulsivity Inventory

    Laurence Claes;Hans Vertommen;N Braspenning

  • Dissociative experiences in the general population in the Netherlands and Belgium: A study with the Dissociative Questionnaire (DIS-Q).

    Johan Vanderlinden;Richard Van Dyck;Walter Vandereycken;Hans Vertommen

  • Process and outcome in psychodynamic hospitalization-based treatment for patients with a personality disorder.

    Rudi Vermote;Benedicte Lowyck;Patrick Luyten;Hans Vertommen

  • Daily hassles reported by chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia patients in tertiary care: a controlled quantitative and qualitative study.

    Boudewijn Van Houdenhove;Eddy Neerinckx;Patrick Onghena;Ad Vingerhoets

Frequent Co-Authors

Guido Pieters
Guido Pieters KU Leuven
Marc De Hert
Marc De Hert KU Leuven
Patrick Luyten
Patrick Luyten University College London
Richard van Dyck
Richard van Dyck VU University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up a variety of online degrees and dynamic career pathways. Depending on your interests, specializations offer unique opportunities in growing fields. For instance, students curious about workplace behavior and productivity might consider what can you do with a degree in industrial organizational psychology, which includes roles in corporate consulting, human resources, and organizational development.

Determining is psychology degree worth it depends on your long-term goals. Psychology graduates gain versatile skills ideal for careers in education, healthcare, business, and social services. Advancing with a master’s degree can open more specialized avenues and higher earning potential.

For those passionate about learning environments, a master’s in educational psychology offers numerous opportunities. Discover more about educational psychology masters jobs, from school psychology to curriculum design and student support services.

Affordability matters for many prospective students. If you’re looking for cost-effective study options, explore cheap online masters in child and adolescent psychology programs that help you gain expertise in child development and advocacy without straining your budget.

Best Scientists Citing Hans Vertommen

Recently Published Articles