World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 80 1445 1289 78 73 168 24629

Richard van Dyck publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard van Dyck between 1988 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard van Dyck published across 33 years, from 1988 to 2020, averaging 5.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2006. 1 of the 170 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2006. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 6 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication
1988 2020

170 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard van Dyck: publications per year, 1988 to 2020
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 1
1991 1
1992 6
1993 4
1994 5
1995 3
1996 5
1997 6
1998 11
1999 8
2000 6
2001 5
2002 9
2003 13
2004 9
2005 9
2006 15
2007 15
2008 7
2009 10
2010 10
2011 2
2012 3
2013 2
2014 1
2015 1
2016 1
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 1
Total 170
Download as CSV

Richard van Dyck publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard van Dyck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 168 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 168
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard van Dyck D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard van Dyck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120 80
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1991 - Fellow of American Physical Society (APS) Citation For his precision measurements of the physical properties of fundamental particles using charged particle traps

Overview

Richard van Dyck is affiliated with VU University Medical Center in the Netherlands and works primarily within the field of psychology. Their research focuses on experimental and cognitive psychology, exploring cognitive abilities and testing.

The scientist has contributed to the academic literature through publications such as the 2021 paper titled "Familial Clustering of Major Depression and Anxiety Disorders in Australian and Dutch Twins and Siblings", published in UNC Libraries. This work forms part of their research interest that intersects psychological traits and familial patterns.

Richard van Dyck collaborates with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Christel M. Middeldorp
  • Andrew J. Birley
  • Daniëlle C. Cath
  • Nathan A. Gillespie
  • Gonneke Willemsen

Their publications have appeared primarily in UNC Libraries, indicating a consistent contribution to that venue.

The researcher's work centers around cognitive abilities and testing, which is reflected in the topics covered by their publications.

Richard van Dyck was awarded the Fellow of American Physical Society (APS) in 1991 for precision measurements of the physical properties of fundamental particles using charged particle traps.

Best Publications

  • Outpatient psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: Randomized trial of schema-focused therapy vs transference-focused psychotherapy

    Josephine Giesen-Bloo;Richard van Dyck;Philip Spinhoven;Willem van Tilburg

  • The Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA): rationale, objectives and methods.

    B.W.J.H. Penninx;A.T.F. Beekman;J.H Smit;F.G. Zitman

  • Major depressive disorder and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity: results from a large cohort study.

    Sophie A. Vreeburg;Witte J. G. Hoogendijk;Johannes van Pelt;Roel H. DeRijk

  • Anxiety and Depression in Later Life: Co-Occurrence and Communality of Risk Factors

    Aartjan T.F. Beekman;Edwin de Beurs;Anton J.L.M. van Balkom;Dorly J.H. Deeg

  • The development and psychometric characteristics of the Somatoform Dissociation Questionnaire (SDQ-20).

    E. R. S. Nijenhuis;P. Spinhoven;R. Van Dyck;O. Van Dee Hart

  • Anxiety disorders in later life: a report from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam.

    Aartjan T. F. Beekman;Marijke A. Bremmer;Dorly J. H. Deeg;Anton J. L. M. Van Balkom

  • Patients' preferences in the treatment of depressive disorder in primary care

    Digna J.F. van Schaik;Alexandra F.J. Klijn;Hein P.J. van Hout;Harm W.J. van Marwijk

  • Association between major depressive disorder and heart rate variability in the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA).

    Carmilla M. M. Licht;Eco J. C. de Geus;Frans G. Zitman;Witte J. G. Hoogendijk

  • Cognitive therapy and exposure in vivo in the treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder

    Patricia Van Oppen;Else De Haan;Anton J. L. M. Van Balkom;I Philip Spinhoven

  • Frontal-striatal dysfunction during planning in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Odile A. van den Heuvel;Dick J. Veltman;Henk J. Groenewegen;Danielle C. Cath

  • Genome-wide association for major depressive disorder: a possible role for the presynaptic protein piccolo

    P.F. Sullivan;E.J.C. de Geus;G. Willemsen;M.R. James

  • Disorder-specific neuroanatomical correlates of attentional bias in obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder, and hypochondriasis.

    Odile A. van den Heuvel;Dick J. Veltman;Henk J. Groenewegen;Menno P. Witter

  • Consequences of anxiety in older persons: its effect on disability, well-being and use of health services.

    E. de Beurs;A. T. F. Beekman;A. J. L. M. van Balkom;D. J. H. Deeg

  • A meta-analysis on the treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder: A comparison of antidepressants, behavior, and cognitive therapy

    Anton J.L.M. van Balkom;Patricia van Oppen;Alexander W.A. Vermeulen;Richard van Dyck

  • Two-year course of depressive and anxiety disorders: Results from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA)

    Brenda W.J.H. Penninx;Brenda W.J.H. Penninx;Brenda W.J.H. Penninx;Willem A. Nolen;Femke Lamers;Frans G. Zitman

  • Higher cortisol levels following exposure to traumatic reminders in abuse-related PTSD.

    Bernet M Elzinga;Christian G Schmahl;Eric Vermetten;Richard van Dyck

  • Depression is associated with decreased blood pressure, but antidepressant use increases the risk for hypertension

    Carmilla M.M. Licht;Eco J.C. de Geus;Adrie Seldenrijk;Hein P.J. van Hout

  • Salivary Cortisol Levels in Persons With and Without Different Anxiety Disorders

    Sophie A. Vreeburg;Frans G. Zitman;Johannes van Pelt;Roel H. DeRijk

  • Implementation of outpatient schema therapy for borderline personality disorder with versus without crisis support by the therapist outside office hours : A randomized trial

    Marjon Nadort;Arnoud Arntz;Johannes H Smit;Josephine Giesen-Bloo

  • Degree of somatoform and psychological dissociation in dissociative disorder is correlated with reported trauma.

    Ellert R. S. Nijenhuis;Philip Spinhoven;Richard van Dyck;Onno van der Hart

  • Frontostriatal system in planning complexity: a parametric functional magnetic resonance version of tower of london task

    Odile A van den Heuvel;Henk J Groenewegen;Frederik Barkhof;Richard H.C Lazeron

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip Spinhoven
Philip Spinhoven Leiden University
Anton J. L. M. van Balkom
Anton J. L. M. van Balkom University of Amsterdam
Patricia van Oppen
Patricia van Oppen Amsterdam UMC
Johannes H. Smit
Johannes H. Smit Leiden University Medical Center
Frans G. Zitman
Frans G. Zitman Leiden University
Aartjan T.F. Beekman
Aartjan T.F. Beekman Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Harm W.J. van Marwijk
Harm W.J. van Marwijk Brighton and Sussex Medical School
Bernet M. Elzinga
Bernet M. Elzinga Leiden University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens a range of online degree and career opportunities. Many students wonder, is it worth becoming a psychologist? While the field offers rewarding career paths, it’s important to consider factors like required education, job demand, and potential salaries.

Specialized degrees can make a difference. For example, if you're interested in working within educational environments, a masters in educational psychology salary can be attractive, especially for those aiming for leadership or research roles in schools and universities.

Affordability is another key factor. Many students seek cheap graduate programs in child and adolescent psychology or look for a cheap organizational psychology masters online to minimize student debt while maximizing their career potential.

With the flexibility of online programs and various financial options, pursuing an advanced psychology degree tailored to your interests is more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Richard van Dyck

Trending Scientists