World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Patricia van Oppen

Patricia van Oppen

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
64
Citations
17985
World Ranking
2944
National Ranking
151

Patricia van Oppen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia van Oppen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 181 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Patricia van Oppen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia van Oppen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patricia van Oppen is affiliated with Amsterdam UMC in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on mental health, with a strong emphasis on clinical psychological conditions such as depression, anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive disorders.

Their work spans several subfields of psychology, including clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry and mental health, cognitive neuroscience, and social psychology. The scientist has produced a significant body of research within the broader field of psychology, contributing extensively to the understanding of mental health disorders and treatment outcomes.

Patricia van Oppen's research topics include:

  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Treatment of Major Depression

They have published in various reputable venues, with frequent contributions to the following journals:

  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
  • BJPsych Open
  • Biological Psychiatry

Some notable recent papers include:

  • The mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people with and without depressive, anxiety, or obsessive-compulsive disorders: a longitudinal study of three Dutch case-control cohorts (2020, The Lancet Psychiatry)
  • The effects of once- versus twice-weekly sessions on psychotherapy outcomes in depressed patients (2020, The British Journal of Psychiatry)
  • Antidepressants or running therapy: Comparing effects on mental and physical health in patients with depression and anxiety disorders (2023, Journal of Affective Disorders)
  • Prevalence, course, and determinants of suicide ideation and attempts in patients with a depressive and/or anxiety disorder: A review of NESDA findings (2021, Journal of Affective Disorders)
  • Treatment efficacy and effectiveness in adults with major depressive disorder and childhood trauma history: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2022, The Lancet Psychiatry)

Collaboration has been a significant aspect of their scientific output, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Merijn Eikelenboom
  • Anton J.L.M. van Balkom
  • Brenda W.J.H. Penninx
  • Adriaan W. Hoogendoorn
  • Neeltje M. Batelaan

Best Publications

  • Cognitive assessment of obsessive-compulsive disorder

    Randy Frost;Gail Steketee;Nader Amir;Martine Bouvard

  • Comorbidity Patterns of Anxiety and Depressive Disorders in a Large Cohort Study: the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA)

    Femke Lamers;Patricia van Oppen;Hannie C. Comijs;Johannes H. Smit

  • Psychometric validation of the obsessive belief questionnaire and interpretation of intrusions inventory - Part 2: Factor analyses and testing of a brief version

    Gail Steketee;Randy Frost;Sunil Bhar;Martine Bouvard

  • Interpersonal psychotherapy for depression: a meta-analysis.

    Pim Cuijpers;Anna S. Geraedts;Patricia van Oppen;Gerhard Andersson

  • Prevalence of depression and anxiety in Multiple Sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Rosa E. Boeschoten;Rosa E. Boeschoten;Annemarie M.J. Braamse;Annemarie M.J. Braamse;Aartjan T.F. Beekman;Aartjan T.F. Beekman;Pim Cuijpers

  • The mental health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people with and without depressive, anxiety, or obsessive-compulsive disorders: a longitudinal study of three Dutch case-control cohorts.

    Kuan Yu Pan;Almar A.L. Kok;Merijn Eikelenboom;Melany Horsfall

  • Cognitive therapy and exposure in vivo in the treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder

    Patricia Van Oppen;Else De Haan;Anton J. L. M. Van Balkom;I Philip Spinhoven

  • Disorder-specific neuroanatomical correlates of attentional bias in obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder, and hypochondriasis.

    Odile A. van den Heuvel;Dick J. Veltman;Henk J. Groenewegen;Menno P. Witter

  • Reduced orbitofrontal-striatal activity on a reversal learning task in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Peter L. Remijnse;Marjan M. A. Nielen;Anton J. L. M. van Balkom;Daniëlle C. Cath

  • The specificity of childhood adversities and negative life events across the life span to anxiety and depressive disorders

    Philip Spinhoven;Philip Spinhoven;Bernet M. Elzinga;Jacqueline G.F.M. Hovens;Karin Roelofs

  • A meta-analysis on the treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder: A comparison of antidepressants, behavior, and cognitive therapy

    Anton J.L.M. van Balkom;Patricia van Oppen;Alexander W.A. Vermeulen;Richard van Dyck

  • Psychotherapy for chronic major depression and dysthymia: A meta-analysis

    Pim Cuijpers;Annemieke van Straten;Josien Schuurmans;Patricia van Oppen

  • The efficacy of non-directive supportive therapy for adult depression : A meta-analysis

    Pim Cuijpers;Ellen Driessen;Steven D. Hollon;Patricia van Oppen

  • The importance of childhood trauma and childhood life events for chronicity of depression in adults

    Jenneke E. Wiersma;Jacqueline G. F. M. Hovens;Patricia van Oppen;Erik J. Giltay

  • THE STRUCTURE OF OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE SYMPTOMS

    Patricia Van Oppen;Rense J. Hoekstra;Paul M.G. Emmelkamp

  • Stepped-care prevention of anxiety and depression in late life: a randomized controlled trial.

    Petronella J. van't Veer-Tazelaar;Harm W. J. van Marwijk;Patricia van Oppen;Hein P. J. van Hout

  • Cognitive therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder

    Patricia van Oppen;Arnoud Arntz

  • A patient-doctor relationship questionnaire (PDRQ-9) in primary care: development and psychometric evaluation

    Christina M Van der Feltz-Cornelis;Patricia Van Oppen;Harm W.J Van Marwijk;Edwin De Beurs

  • Are psychological and pharmacologic interventions equally effective in the treatment of adult depressive disorders? A meta-analysis of comparative studies.

    Pim Cuijpers;Annemieke van Straten;Patricia van Oppen;Gerhard Andersson

  • Cognitive and behavioral therapies alone versus in combination with fluvoxamine in the treatment of obsessive Compulsive disorder

    Anton J. L. M. van Balkom;Else de Haan;Patricia van Oppen;Philip Spinhoven

Frequent Co-Authors

Anton J. L. M. van Balkom
Anton J. L. M. van Balkom University of Amsterdam
Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Aartjan T.F. Beekman
Aartjan T.F. Beekman Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Johannes H. Smit
Johannes H. Smit Leiden University Medical Center
Richard van Dyck
Richard van Dyck VU University Medical Center
Paul M. G. Emmelkamp
Paul M. G. Emmelkamp University of Amsterdam
Harm W.J. van Marwijk
Harm W.J. van Marwijk Brighton and Sussex Medical School
Danielle C. Cath
Danielle C. Cath Utrecht University
Joost Dekker
Joost Dekker University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When considering a psychology degree in the USA, it’s important to explore related online degrees and the career pathways they open. Many students interested in counseling pursue online master's programs to prepare for licensure as a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC), a common career choice after a psychology degree.

Each state has different LPC requirements, which means your pathway to licensure will depend on where you plan to practice. For example, the lpc licensure requirements in Alaska have specific educational and supervision components. If you are interested in practicing in Arizona, it’s important to understand how to get an lpc license in Arizona, since requirements can differ notably from other states.

Likewise, students can look into how to get an lpc license in Arkansas and familiarize themselves with unique Arkansas standards. Those considering practice in California should review the current lpc license requirements in California before selecting a program.

Understanding state-specific requirements helps you pick the right online degree and ensures a smoother transition from study to a professional counseling career.

Best Scientists Citing Patricia van Oppen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles