World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Adam S. Radomsky

Adam S. Radomsky

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7537 7029 511 482 160 7554

Adam S. Radomsky publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Adam S. Radomsky between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Adam S. Radomsky published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2014. 14 of the 166 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2014. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 7 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 10 publications
1998 2025

166 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Adam S. Radomsky: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 1
2000 0
2001 4
2002 3
2003 1
2004 7
2005 2
2006 8
2007 4
2008 6
2009 5
2010 7
2011 7
2012 7
2013 8
2014 19
2015 7
2016 9
2017 6
2018 6
2019 5
2020 10
2021 9
2022 4
2023 6
2024 4
2025 10
Total 166
Download as CSV

Adam S. Radomsky publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam S. Radomsky sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 160 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 160
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Adam S. Radomsky D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam S. Radomsky sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Adam S. Radomsky is affiliated with Concordia University in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on the field of psychology, with significant contributions in clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, and sociology and political science.

Their scholarly output is extensive, with a notable emphasis on obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders. Other recurring themes in their work include anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, emotions and moral behavior, eating disorders and behaviors, and sexuality, behavior, and technology.

Frequent publication venues for Radomsky's research include:

  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
  • Cognitive Therapy and Research
  • Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

Radomsky's recent published papers feature several areas of study and have appeared in various reputable journals. Examples include:

  • "Development and validation of the multidimensional version of the fear of self questionnaire: Corrupted, culpable and malformed feared possible selves in obsessive-compulsive and body-dysmorphic symptoms" (2021) in Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
  • "Fear and Anxiety in COVID-19: Preexisting Anxiety Disorders" (2021) in Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
  • "Beliefs about losing control, obsessions, and caution: An experimental investigation" (2020) in Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • "The fear of losing control" (2022) in Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
  • "It's not so much about what you touch: Mental contamination mediates the relationship between feared self-perceptions and contact contamination" (2020) in Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Sandra Krause
  • Shiu F. Wong
  • Frederick Aardema
  • Martha Giraldo-O'Meara
  • Andrea Sandstrom

Adam S. Radomsky's work spans multiple topics within psychology, with a strong focus on obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders alongside related anxiety and cognitive processes. Their research output across journals and collaborative projects reflects a concentration on clinical and experimental investigation into mental health conditions and associated psychological mechanisms.

Best Publications

  • A critical evaluation of obsessive-compulsive disorder subtypes: symptoms versus mechanisms.

    Dean McKay;Jonathan Stuart Abramowitz;John E. Calamari;Michael Kyrios

  • The Vancouver Obsessional Compulsive Inventory (VOCI).

    Dana S. Thordarson;Adam S. Radomsky;S. Rachman;Roz Shafran

  • Safety behaviour: A reconsideration

    S. Rachman;Adam S. Radomsky;Roz Shafran

  • Memory bias, confidence and responsibility in compulsive checking.

    Adam S. Radomsky;S. Rachman;David Hammond

  • Memory bias in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).

    Adam S Radomsky;S Rachman

  • Repeated checking really does cause memory distrust.

    Adam S. Radomsky;Philippe T. Gilchrist;Dominique Dussault

  • The Claustrophobia Questionnaire.

    Adam S Radomsky;S Rachman;Dana S Thordarson;Heather K McIsaac

  • Part 1—You can run but you can't hide: Intrusive thoughts on six continents

    Adam S. Radomsky;Gillian M. Alcolado;Jonathan Stuart Abramowitz;Pino Alonso

  • Connections among symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder: a case series.

    Beth S Gershuny;Lee Baer;Adam S Radomsky;Kimberly A Wilson

  • Safety behaviour does not necessarily interfere with exposure therapy

    Irena Milosevic;Adam S. Radomsky

  • Symmetry, ordering and arranging compulsive behaviour.

    Adam S. Radomsky;Adam S. Radomsky;S. Rachman

  • Exploring the boundaries of memory distrust from repeated checking: Increasing external validity and examining thresholds

    Meredith E. Coles;Adam S. Radomsky;Betty Horng

  • Fear of self and obsessionality: Development and validation of the Fear of Self Questionnaire

    Frederick Aardema;Richard Moulding;Richard Moulding;Adam S. Radomsky;Guy Doron

  • Analyses of mental contamination: Part I, experimental manipulations of morality.

    Corinna M. Elliott;Adam S. Radomsky

  • Why do people seek reassurance and check repeatedly? An investigation of factors involved in compulsive behavior in OCD and depression

    Chris L. Parrish;Adam S. Radomsky

  • Reducing contamination by exposure plus safety behaviour.

    S. Rachman;Roz Shafran;Adam S. Radomsky;Eva Zysk;Eva Zysk

  • Separating hoarding from OCD

    S. Rachman;Corinna M. Elliott;Roz Shafran;Adam S. Radomsky

  • Mental contamination: the perpetrator effect.

    S. Rachman;Adam S. Radomsky;Corinna M. Elliott;Eva Zysk;Eva Zysk

  • Anxiety-control strategies: is there room for neutralization in successful exposure treatment?

    Chris L. Parrish;Adam S. Radomsky;Michel J. Dugas

  • Predictors of psychological well-being in a diverse sample of HIV-positive patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy.

    Steven A. Safren;Steven A. Safren;Steven A. Safren;Adam S. Radomsky;Adam S. Radomsky;Adam S. Radomsky;Michael W. Otto;Michael W. Otto;Michael W. Otto;Elizabeth Salomon;Elizabeth Salomon;Elizabeth Salomon

Frequent Co-Authors

Stanley Rachman
Stanley Rachman University of British Columbia
Roz Shafran
Roz Shafran University College London
Michel J. Dugas
Michel J. Dugas Université du Québec en Outaouais
Richard Moulding
Richard Moulding Deakin University
Frederick Aardema
Frederick Aardema University of Montreal
Kieron O'Connor
Kieron O'Connor University of Montreal
David A. Clark
David A. Clark University of New Brunswick
Guy Doron
Guy Doron Reichman University
Meredith E. Coles
Meredith E. Coles Binghamton University
Steven Taylor
Steven Taylor University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering an online psychology degree opens doors to diverse and dynamic career options. With mental health awareness on the rise, many psychology roles are experiencing faster-than-average job growth. Curious about which fields are expanding the quickest? Explore the fastest growing psychology major jobs to identify promising opportunities.

For those interested in applying psychological principles to the legal system, demand for professionals is also increasing. If you’d like to combine law and mental health, learn more about what is the demand for forensic psychologists and see if this specialized path is right for you.

Another rapidly growing field is health psychology, focusing on how mental states impact physical wellbeing. Learn about rewarding health psychology jobs that emphasize the connection between psychology and healthcare.

If salary is a key motivator, there are several well-compensated positions to consider. Discover the highest paid therapist jobs and how advanced qualifications can enhance earning potential within the field.

Best Scientists Citing Adam S. Radomsky

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles