World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 91 910 797 40 32 268 39636

Steven Taylor publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Steven Taylor between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Steven Taylor published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 7.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2025. 38 of the 325 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2025. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 17 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 3 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 4 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 35 publications
1981 2025

325 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Steven Taylor: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 2
1992 4
1993 4
1994 7
1995 9
1996 7
1997 8
1998 10
1999 6
2000 4
2001 8
2002 6
2003 13
2004 12
2005 17
2006 19
2007 17
2008 9
2009 9
2010 10
2011 9
2012 9
2013 4
2014 15
2015 1
2016 3
2017 5
2018 1
2019 4
2020 18
2021 15
2022 12
2023 8
2024 3
2025 35
Total 325
Download as CSV

Steven Taylor publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven Taylor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–270 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 268 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171 268
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Steven Taylor D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven Taylor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77 91
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Steven Taylor is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada and specializes in the field of psychology with a focus on clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, applied psychology, and health. Their research has contributed primarily to understanding mental health issues, especially related to anxiety and responses to pandemics.

Their work prominently addresses several main topics including:

  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Steven Taylor has published extensively in a range of academic journals, with frequent appearances in:

  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders
  • PLoS ONE
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Personality and Individual Differences

Selected recent papers by Steven Taylor include:

  • Development and initial validation of the COVID Stress Scales, 2020, Journal of Anxiety Disorders
  • COVID stress syndrome: Concept, structure, and correlates, 2020, Depression and Anxiety

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Gordon J. G. Asmundson
  • Michelle M. Paluszek
  • Geoffrey S. Rachor
  • Caeleigh A. Landry
  • Dean McKay

Steven Taylor has also contributed to book publications. Notable books include The Psychology of Pandemics published by the National Institutes of Health in 2022, and Die Pandemie als psychologische Herausforderung published by Psychosozial-Verlag eBooks in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Robust dimensions of anxiety sensitivity: Development and initial validation of the anxiety sensitivity index-3

    Steven Taylor;Michael J. Zvolensky;Brian J. Cox;Brett Deacon

  • The Psychology of Pandemics: Preparing for the Next Global Outbreak of Infectious Disease

    Steven Taylor

  • Cognitive assessment of obsessive-compulsive disorder

    Randy Frost;Gail Steketee;Nader Amir;Martine Bouvard

  • Comparative efficacy of treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder: a meta-analysis

    Michelle L. Van Etten;Steven Taylor

  • Coronaphobia: Fear and the 2019-nCoV outbreak.

    Gordon J.G. Asmundson;Steven Taylor

  • Development and initial validation of the COVID Stress Scales.

    Steven Taylor;Caeleigh A. Landry;Michelle M. Paluszek;Thomas A. Fergus

  • Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder

    Jonathan Stuart Abramowitz;Steven Taylor;Dean McKay

  • How does anxiety sensitivity vary across the anxiety disorders

    Steven Taylor;William J. Koch;Richard J. McNally

  • PTSD and the Experience of Pain: Research and Clinical Implications of Shared Vulnerability and Mutual Maintenance Models:

    Gordon J G Asmundson;Michael J Coons;Steven Taylor;Joel Katz

  • Comparative efficacy, speed, and adverse effects of three PTSD treatments: Exposure therapy, EMDR, and relaxation training.

    Steven Taylor;Dana S. Thordarson;Louise Maxfield;Ingrid C. Fedoroff

  • Anxiety Sensitivity : theory, Research, and Treatment of the Fear of Anxiety

    Steven Taylor

  • Genetic and Environmental Influences on Trauma Exposure and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms: A Twin Study

    Murray B. Stein;Kerry L. Jang;Steven Taylor;Philip A. Vernon

  • Psychometric validation of the obsessive belief questionnaire and interpretation of intrusions inventory - Part 2: Factor analyses and testing of a brief version

    Gail Steketee;Randy Frost;Sunil Bhar;Martine Bouvard

  • A critical evaluation of obsessive-compulsive disorder subtypes: symptoms versus mechanisms.

    Dean McKay;Jonathan Stuart Abramowitz;John E. Calamari;Michael Kyrios

  • Development and initial validation of the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire and the Interpretation of Intrusions Inventory.

    M Freeston;G Steketee;R Frost;N Amir

  • Psychometric validation of the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire and the Interpretation of Intrusions Inventory: Part I

    Gail Steketee;Randy Frost;Sunil Bhar;Martine Bouvard

  • COVID stress syndrome: Concept, structure, and correlates.

    Steven Taylor;Caeleigh A. Landry;Michelle M. Paluszek;Thomas A. Fergus

  • Meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioral treatments for social phobia

    Steven Taylor

  • Psychological and pharmacological treatments of social phobia: a meta-analysis.

    Ingrid C. Fedoroff;Steven Taylor

  • Comparative Efficacy of Treatments for Post-traumatic Stress Disorder:

    Michelle L. Van Etten;Steven Taylor

Frequent Co-Authors

Gordon J.G. Asmundson
Gordon J.G. Asmundson University of Regina
Dean McKay
Dean McKay Fordham University
Jonathan S. Abramowitz
Jonathan S. Abramowitz University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Kerry L. Jang
Kerry L. Jang University of British Columbia
Brian J. Cox
Brian J. Cox University of Manitoba
Murray B. Stein
Murray B. Stein University of California, San Diego
Sherry H. Stewart
Sherry H. Stewart Dalhousie University
Michael Kyrios
Michael Kyrios Flinders University
David A. Clark
David A. Clark University of New Brunswick
Sheila R. Woody
Sheila R. Woody University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up diverse online degree options and fulfilling career pathways. Many students gravitate toward counseling, a field with growing demand and varied specialization opportunities, such as mental health, school, or rehabilitation counseling.

If you’re considering becoming a professional counselor, investigating regional programs is a great first step. For students in Arizona, there are standout Tucson counseling degree programs. Those in Texas may find robust options by reviewing Texas counseling degree programs. In the Pacific Northwest, the best college counseling programs in Washington offer unique perspectives and training environments.

The nation’s capital is home to institutions with rigorous best counseling degree programs in Washington, D.C. Many of these programs, whether on campus or online, provide pathways to licensure and specialized practice.

Online psychology and counseling degrees offer flexibility, allowing students to balance studies with work or family obligations. Graduates may pursue roles in mental health clinics, schools, private practice, or nonprofit organizations. As the need for trained mental health professionals grows, choosing the right program is a crucial step toward a rewarding career.

Best Scientists Citing Steven Taylor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles