World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Philip W. Connelly

Philip W. Connelly

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
23028
World Ranking
15706
National Ranking
656

Philip W. Connelly publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip W. Connelly sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 346 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Philip W. Connelly D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip W. Connelly sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip W. Connelly is a researcher affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada, specializing in medicine with a significant focus on obstetrics, gynecology, and metabolic diseases. Their academic work encompasses a wide range of topics primarily centered around gestational diabetes, metabolic complications in pregnancy, and related cardiovascular and inflammatory conditions.

Their research contributions span several subfields including:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Surgery
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
  • Epidemiology

The main topics covered in their publications include:

  • Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Pregnancy and Preeclampsia Studies
  • Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
  • Diet and Metabolism Studies
  • Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Philip W. Connelly has authored numerous papers published in journals with a focus on diabetes and metabolic health. Key recent publications include:

  • Adipose Tissue Insulin Resistance Is Longitudinally Associated With Adipose Tissue Dysfunction, Circulating Lipids, and Dysglycemia: The PROMISE Cohort, 2021, Diabetes Care
  • Subtypes of Gestational Diabetes and Future Risk of Pre-Diabetes or Diabetes, 2021, EClinicalMedicine
  • The Association of Soluble CD163, a Novel Biomarker of Macrophage Activation, With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Its Underlying Physiological Disorders: A Systematic Review, 2021, Obesity Reviews
  • Postpartum Weight Retention and the Early Evolution of Cardiovascular Risk Over the First 5 Years After Pregnancy, 2024, Cardiovascular Diabetology
  • Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Maternal Risk of Diabetes After Pregnancy, 2023, Diabetes Care

Their frequent co-authors indicate active collaboration within the field, working extensively with researchers such as:

  • Anthony J. Hanley
  • Ravi Retnakaran
  • Bernard Zinman
  • Mathew Sermer
  • Chang Ye

The venues where they publish most frequently include:

  • Diabetes Care
  • EClinicalMedicine
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
  • Cardiovascular Diabetology
  • Obesity Reviews

Best Publications

  • A major role for VCAM-1, but not ICAM-1, in early atherosclerosis

    Myron I. Cybulsky;Kaeko Iiyama;Hongmei Li;Suning Zhu

  • Effects of a Dietary Portfolio of Cholesterol-Lowering Foods vs Lovastatin on Serum Lipids and C-Reactive Protein

    David J. A. Jenkins;Cyril W. C. Kendall;Augustine Marchie;Dorothea A. Faulkner

  • Paraoxonase: biochemistry, genetics and relationship to plasma lipoproteins.

    Michael I. Mackness;Bharti Mackness;Paul N. Durrington;Philip W. Connelly

  • Dose Response of Almonds on Coronary Heart Disease Risk Factors: Blood Lipids, Oxidized Low-Density Lipoproteins, Lipoprotein(a), Homocysteine, and Pulmonary Nitric Oxide A Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Trial

    David J.A. Jenkins;Cyril W.C. Kendall;Augustine Marchie;Tina L. Parker

  • Effects of high- and low-isoflavone soyfoods on blood lipids, oxidized LDL, homocysteine, and blood pressure in hyperlipidemic men and women

    David J A Jenkins;Cyril W C Kendall;Chung-Ja C Jackson;Philip W Connelly

  • The Canadian Trial of Carbohydrates in Diabetes (CCD), a 1-y controlled trial of low-glycemic-index dietary carbohydrate in type 2 diabetes: no effect on glycated hemoglobin but reduction in C-reactive protein

    Thomas M S Wolever;Alison L Gibbs;Christine Mehling;Jean-Louis Chiasson

  • C-reactive protein and gestational diabetes: the central role of maternal obesity.

    Ravi Retnakaran;Anthony J. G. Hanley;Nuryt Raif;Philip W. Connelly

  • Influence of Interferon-γ on the Extent and Phenotype of Diet-Induced Atherosclerosis in the LDLR-Deficient Mouse

    Chiara Buono;Carolyn E. Come;George Stavrakis;Graham F. Maguire

  • Direct comparison of a dietary portfolio of cholesterol-lowering foods with a statin in hypercholesterolemic participants

    David J A Jenkins;Cyril W C Kendall;Augustine Marchie;Dorothea A Faulkner

  • Glucose Intolerance in Pregnancy and Future Risk of Pre-Diabetes or Diabetes

    Ravi Retnakaran;Ying Qi;Mathew Sermer;Philip W Connelly

  • Effect of Empagliflozin on Erythropoietin Levels, Iron Stores, and Red Blood Cell Morphology in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Coronary Artery Disease.

    C. David Mazer;Gregory M.T. Hare;Philip W. Connelly;Richard E. Gilbert

  • Hepatic lipase deficiency. Clinical, biochemical, and molecular genetic characteristics.

    R. A. Hegele;J. A. Little;C. Vezina;G. F. Maguire

  • Effect of Wheat Bran on Glycemic Control and Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease in Type 2 Diabetes

    David J. A. Jenkins;Cyril W. C. Kendall;Livia S. A. Augustin;Margaret C. Martini

  • Assessment of the longer-term effects of a dietary portfolio of cholesterol-lowering foods in hypercholesterolemia

    David J. A. Jenkins;Cyril W. C. Kendall;Dorothea A. Faulkner;Tri Nguyen

  • Glucose intolerance in pregnancy and postpartum risk of metabolic syndrome in young women.

    Ravi Retnakaran;Ravi Retnakaran;Ying Qi;Philip W. Connelly;Philip W. Connelly;Mathew Sermer

  • Effect of a very-high-fiber vegetable, fruit, and nut diet on serum lipids and colonic function

    David J.A. Jenkins;Cyril W.C. Kendall;David G. Popovich;Edward Vidgen

  • Effect of a dietary portfolio of cholesterol-lowering foods given at 2 levels of intensity of dietary advice on serum lipids in hyperlipidemia: a randomized controlled trial.

    David J. A. Jenkins;Peter J. H. Jones;Benoit Lamarche;Cyril W. C. Kendall

  • Reduced adiponectin concentration in women with gestational diabetes: a potential factor in progression to type 2 diabetes.

    Ravi Retnakaran;Anthony J.G. Hanley;Nuryt Raif;Philip W. Connelly

  • A dietary portfolio approach to cholesterol reduction: combined effects of plant sterols, vegetable proteins, and viscous fibers in hypercholesterolemia.

    David J.A. Jenkins;Cyril W.C. Kendall;Dorothea Faulkner;Edward Vidgen

  • Hyperlipidemia and Atherosclerotic Lesion Development in LDL Receptor–Deficient Mice Fed Defined Semipurified Diets With and Without Cholate

    Andrew H. Lichtman;Steven K. Clinton;Kaeko Iiyama;Philip W. Connelly

Frequent Co-Authors

Bernard Zinman
Bernard Zinman University of Toronto
Anthony J.G. Hanley
Anthony J.G. Hanley University of Toronto
Robert A. Hegele
Robert A. Hegele University of Western Ontario
David J.A. Jenkins
David J.A. Jenkins University of Toronto
Stewart B. Harris
Stewart B. Harris University of Western Ontario
Thomas M. S. Wolever
Thomas M. S. Wolever University of Toronto
Robert G. Josse
Robert G. Josse University of Toronto
Cyril W.C. Kendall
Cyril W.C. Kendall University of Toronto
Peter Jones
Peter Jones University of Cambridge
Arnis Kuksis
Arnis Kuksis University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in healthcare careers outside of traditional medical school, there are several online pathways to consider. One popular route is nursing. Emerging programs now offer direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors online, allowing individuals with diverse undergraduate backgrounds to quickly transition into advanced nursing roles.

If you’re seeking accessible options, some nursing programs with high acceptance rates help students begin their nursing journey with fewer barriers. Additionally, applicants can find a nursing school that does not require teas test, ideal for those who prefer not to take standardized entrance exams.

Beyond nursing, healthcare administration and medical coding offer flexible career options. The healthcare industry has a strong demand for trained billing and coding professionals. Consider exploring the best online medical billing and coding schools for quality programs that also provide financial aid opportunities.

These alternative degree and certification programs open the door to rewarding healthcare careers and can often be completed online, providing flexibility and diverse entry points into the field.

Best Scientists Citing Philip W. Connelly

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles