World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Scientists
2025
Award Badge
Medicine
UK
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Scientists 183 549 507 59 55 2343 142003
Medicine 186 295 268 35 33 1820 140160

Peter Jones publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Jones between 1956 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Jones published across 71 years, from 1956 to 2026, averaging 36.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 188 publications in 2007. 19 of the 2,572 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
50 100 150
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1956 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 188. Peak 188 publications in 2007. 1956: 1 publication 1957: 0 publications 1958: 1 publication 1959: 1 publication 1960: 0 publications 1961: 1 publication 1962: 1 publication 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 2 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 2 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 6 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 4 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 9 publications 1988: 12 publications 1989: 14 publications 1990: 15 publications 1991: 22 publications 1992: 20 publications 1993: 39 publications 1994: 33 publications 1995: 47 publications 1996: 46 publications 1997: 34 publications 1998: 43 publications 1999: 53 publications 2000: 64 publications 2001: 53 publications 2002: 62 publications 2003: 76 publications 2004: 67 publications 2005: 75 publications 2006: 97 publications 2007: 188 publications 2008: 102 publications 2009: 101 publications 2010: 74 publications 2011: 81 publications 2012: 92 publications 2013: 80 publications 2014: 111 publications 2015: 92 publications 2016: 90 publications 2017: 90 publications 2018: 82 publications 2019: 69 publications 2020: 72 publications 2021: 93 publications 2022: 42 publications 2023: 124 publications 2024: 45 publications 2025: 18 publications 2026: 1 publication
1956 2026

2,572 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Jones: publications per year, 1956 to 2026
Year Publications
1956 1
1957 0
1958 1
1959 1
1960 0
1961 1
1962 1
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 2
1970 0
1971 0
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 1
1978 2
1979 3
1980 6
1981 3
1982 1
1983 4
1984 3
1985 7
1986 6
1987 9
1988 12
1989 14
1990 15
1991 22
1992 20
1993 39
1994 33
1995 47
1996 46
1997 34
1998 43
1999 53
2000 64
2001 53
2002 62
2003 76
2004 67
2005 75
2006 97
2007 188
2008 102
2009 101
2010 74
2011 81
2012 92
2013 80
2014 111
2015 92
2016 90
2017 90
2018 82
2019 69
2020 72
2021 93
2022 42
2023 124
2024 45
2025 18
2026 1
Total 2,572
Download as CSV

Peter Jones publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Jones sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,796+ publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,820 publications — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100 1,820
Download as CSV

Peter Jones D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Jones sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 186–187 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 186 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20 186
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Medicine in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Best Scientists Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Medicine in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Peter Jones is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom and has an extensive publication record spanning Medicine and Psychology. Their research is concentrated primarily in the fields of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Clinical Psychology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, along with related areas such as Social Psychology and Pharmacology.

The main topics of their work cover various aspects of mental health, including schizophrenia research and treatment, mental health treatment and access, and broader mental health research topics. Their research also touches on bipolar disorder and treatment, tryptophan and brain disorders, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, and the impact of COVID-19 on mental health.

Among their recent papers are:

  • Age at onset of mental disorders worldwide: large-scale meta-analysis of 192 epidemiological studies (2021), published in Molecular Psychiatry
  • Brain charts for the human lifespan (2022), published in Nature
  • The social determinants of mental health and disorder: evidence, prevention and recommendations (2024), published in World Psychiatry
  • The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024), published in The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Association of inflammation with depression and anxiety: evidence for symptom-specificity and potential causality from UK Biobank and NESDA cohorts (2021), published in Molecular Psychiatry

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Peter Jones include Stephen M. Stahl, Sepehr Hafizi, Veronika Dobler, Liliana Galindo, and George Griffiths.

Their work has been consistently published in journals such as Psychological Medicine, Schizophrenia Bulletin, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Molecular Psychiatry, and Schizophrenia Research.

Peter Jones has also contributed to the academic literature through books, including a publication with Springer Science+Business Media titled "Neuroinflammation and Schizophrenia" released in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Cannabis use and risk of psychotic or affective mental health outcomes: a systematic review

    Theresa H. M. Moore;Stanley Zammit;Stanley Zammit;Anne Lingford-Hughes;Thomas R. E. Barnes

  • Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin across doses (STELLAR* trial)

    Peter H Jones;Michael H Davidson;Evan A Stein;Harold E Bays

  • Association Between Duration of Untreated Psychosis and Outcome in Cohorts of First-Episode Patients: A Systematic Review

    Max Marshall;Shon Lewis;Austin Lockwood;Richard Drake

  • Reduction in Obesity and Related Comorbid Conditions after Diet-Induced Weight Loss or Exercise-Induced Weight Loss in Men: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

    Robert Ross;Damon Dagnone;Peter J.H. Jones;Heidi Smith

  • CHILD DEVELOPMENTAL RISK-FACTORS FOR ADULT SCHIZOPHRENIA IN THE BRITISH 1946 BIRTH COHORT

    P Jones;B Rodgers;R Murray;M Marmot

  • Comparative dose efficacy study of atorvastatin versus simvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, and Fluvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia (The CURVES Study)

    Peter Jones;Stephanie Kafonek;Irene Laurora;Donald Hunninghake

  • Obstetric Complications and Schizophrenia: Historical and Meta-Analytic Review

    Mary Cannon;Peter B. Jones;Robin M. Murray

  • Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effect on Quality of Life of Second- vs First-Generation Antipsychotic Drugs in Schizophrenia: Cost Utility of the Latest Antipsychotic Drugs in Schizophrenia Study (CUtLASS 1)

    Peter B. Jones;Thomas R. E. Barnes;Linda Davies;Graham Dunn

  • Efficacy and Safety of Plant Stanols and Sterols in the Management of Blood Cholesterol Levels

    Martijn B. Katan;Scott M. Grundy;Peter Jones;Malcolm Law

  • The valuation of reliability for personal travel

    John Bates;John Polak;Peter M. Jones;Andrew J. Cook

  • Oligodendrocyte dysfunction in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

    Dmitri Tkachev;Michael L Mimmack;Michael L Mimmack;Margaret M Ryan;Margaret M Ryan;Matt Wayland

  • The contribution of cannabis use to variation in the incidence of psychotic disorder across Europe (EU-GEI): a multicentre case-control study

    Marta Di Forti;Marta Di Forti;Marta Di Forti;Diego Quattrone;Diego Quattrone;Diego Quattrone;Tom P. Freeman;Giada Tripoli

  • Inflammation and immunity in schizophrenia: implications for pathophysiology and treatment

    Golam M Khandaker;Golam M Khandaker;Golam M Khandaker;Lesley Cousins;Lesley Cousins;Lesley Cousins;Julia Deakin;Julia Deakin;Julia Deakin;Belinda R Lennox

  • National Lipid Association Recommendations for Patient-Centered Management of Dyslipidemia: Part 1—Full Report

    Terry A. Jacobson;Matthew K. Ito;Kevin C. Maki;Carl E. Orringer

  • Dietary phytosterols: A review of metabolism, benefits and side effects

    W.H Ling;P.J.H Jones

  • Association of Serum Interleukin 6 and C-Reactive Protein in Childhood With Depression and Psychosis in Young Adult Life: A Population-Based Longitudinal Study

    Golam M. Khandaker;Rebecca M. Pearson;Stanley Zammit;Stanley Zammit;Glyn Lewis;Glyn Lewis

  • Percent change in wound area of diabetic foot ulcers over a 4-week period is a robust predictor of complete healing in a 12-week prospective trial.

    Peter Sheehan;Peter Jones;Antonella Caselli;John M. Giurini

  • Adult mental health disorders and their age at onset

    P. B. Jones

  • The Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia scale: a simple instrument to measure the diversity of symptoms present in schizophrenia.

    J M Haro;S A Kamath;S Ochoa;D Novick

  • Reduction in Obesity and Related Comorbid Conditions after Diet-Induced Weight Loss or Exercise-Induced Weight Loss in Men

    Robert Ross;Damon Dagnone;Peter J.H. Jones;Heidi Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Robin M. Murray
Robin M. Murray King's College London
Daphne Comfort
Daphne Comfort University of Gloucestershire
Craig Morgan
Craig Morgan King's College London
Paola Dazzan
Paola Dazzan King's College London
David Hillier
David Hillier University of Strathclyde
Richard C. Strange
Richard C. Strange Keele University
Anthony A. Fryer
Anthony A. Fryer Keele University
Kevin Morgan
Kevin Morgan University of Nottingham
Graham K. Murray
Graham K. Murray University of Cambridge
James B. Kirkbride
James B. Kirkbride University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA can lead to a diverse range of career options. Aside from a traditional MD degree, aspiring healthcare professionals are increasingly turning to online programs to advance their careers, enhance flexibility, and make education more affordable.

For those interested in healthcare management, affordable mha online programs offer a pathway to leadership roles in hospitals and clinics. Nurses aiming to reach the highest clinical levels should explore the best dnp programs online to become nurse practitioners or clinical leaders.

Pharmacists can advance through pharm d online programs, which combine clinical knowledge with the flexibility of distance learning. For those interested in the technological side of healthcare, health information technology online degree options are a great way to enter the growing field of health informatics.

These online degree pathways support various career goals in healthcare, allowing students to pursue specialized roles while balancing work and study.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Jones

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles