World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 57 4052 3737 434 411 230 11555

Graham K. Murray publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Graham K. Murray between 1984 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Graham K. Murray published across 43 years, from 1984 to 2026, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2021. 11 of the 281 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2021. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 10 publications 2026: 1 publication
1984 2026

281 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Graham K. Murray: publications per year, 1984 to 2026
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 4
1993 2
1994 2
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 2
2004 4
2005 8
2006 8
2007 4
2008 11
2009 5
2010 13
2011 12
2012 10
2013 7
2014 19
2015 22
2016 7
2017 14
2018 15
2019 17
2020 10
2021 23
2022 17
2023 12
2024 19
2025 10
2026 1
Total 281
Download as CSV

Graham K. Murray publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graham K. Murray sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–230 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 230 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283 230
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Graham K. Murray D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graham K. Murray sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 57
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Graham K. Murray is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research work primarily falls within the broad field of Medicine, with a focus on Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Genetics, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders

Murray has contributed to numerous papers, including recent publications such as:

  • "Could Polygenic Risk Scores Be Useful in Psychiatry?" (2020), published in JAMA Psychiatry
  • "From Basic Science to Clinical Application of Polygenic Risk Scores" (2020), published in JAMA Psychiatry
  • "GWAS of peptic ulcer disease implicates Helicobacter pylori infection, other gastrointestinal disorders and depression" (2021), published in Nature Communications
  • "Educational attainment, structural brain reserve and Alzheimer's disease: a Mendelian randomization analysis" (2022), published in Brain
  • "Precision weighting of cortical unsigned prediction error signals benefits learning, is mediated by dopamine, and is impaired in psychosis" (2020), published in Molecular Psychiatry

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, with notable coauthors including Franziska Knolle, Benjamin I. Perry, John Suckling, Peter B. Jones, and Rachel Upthegrove. These collaborations have resulted in multiple publications across various topics within their fields of study.

Murray's research outputs have appeared in several publication venues, notably:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Molecular Psychiatry

Their work encompasses extensive study of polygenic risk scores in psychiatry, neuroimaging techniques, genetic epidemiology, and mental health disorders. Through diverse publications and collaborations, Murray contributes to the understanding of psychiatric conditions, brain connectivity, and genetic influences in medicine.

Best Publications

  • Substantia nigra/ventral tegmental reward prediction error disruption in psychosis

    G K Murray;P R Corlett;L Clark;M Pessiglione

  • Disrupted prediction-error signal in psychosis: evidence for an associative account of delusions.

    P.R. Corlett;G.K. Murray;G.D. Honey;M.R.F. Aitken

  • Learning and cognitive flexibility: frontostriatal function and monoaminergic modulation

    Angie A Kehagia;Graham K Murray;Trevor W Robbins

  • Early detection and intervention evaluation for people at risk of psychosis: multisite randomised controlled trial

    Anthonty P. Morrison;Paul French;Suzanne L.K. Stewart;Max Birchwood

  • From Basic Science to Clinical Application of Polygenic Risk Scores: A Primer.

    Naomi R. Wray;Tian Lin;Jehannine Austin;John J. McGrath

  • Substance use in a population-based clinic sample of people with first-episode psychosis

    Jennifer H. Barnett;Ursula Werners;Sandra M. Secher;Katherine E. Hill

  • Schizophrenia following pre-natal exposure to influenza epidemics between 1939 and 1960.

    Pak C. Sham;Eadbhard O'Callaghan;Noriyoshi Takei;Graham K. Murray

  • Decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury: the randomized multicenter RESCUEicp study (www.RESCUEicp.com).

    P. J. Hutchinson;E. Corteen;M. Czosnyka;A. D. Mendelow

  • Could Polygenic Risk Scores Be Useful in Psychiatry?: A Review.

    Graham K. Murray;Graham K. Murray;Tian Lin;Jehannine Austin;John J. McGrath;John J. McGrath;John J. McGrath

  • Predictors of schizophrenia--a review.

    Pirjo Mäki;Juha Veijola;Peter B. Jones;Graham K. Murray

  • What causes the onset of psychosis

    Matthew R. Broome;James B. Woolley;Paul Tabraham;Louise C. Johns

  • Infant motor development is associated with adult cognitive categorisation in a longitudinal birth cohort study.

    G.K. Murray;G.K. Murray;J. Veijola;K. Moilanen;J. Miettunen

  • Psychological effects of ketamine in healthy volunteers. Phenomenological study.

    E. Pomarol-Clotet;G. D. Honey;G. K. Murray;P. R. Corlett

  • Frontal responses during learning predict vulnerability to the psychotogenic effects of ketamine: Linking cognition, brain activity, and psychosis

    Philip R. Corlett;Garry D. Honey;Michael R. F. Aitken;Anthony Dickinson

  • GWAS of peptic ulcer disease implicates Helicobacter pylori infection, other gastrointestinal disorders and depression

    Yeda Wu;Graham K. Murray;Enda M. Byrne;Julia Sidorenko

  • Fronto-cerebellar systems are associated with infant motor and adult executive functions in healthy adults but not in schizophrenia.

    Khanum Ridler;Juha M. Veijola;Päivikki Tanskanen;Jouko Miettunen

  • Infant Developmental Milestones and Subsequent Cognitive Function

    Graham K. Murray;Peter B. Jones;Diana Kuh;Marcus Richards

  • Reinforcement and Reversal Learning in First-Episode Psychosis

    G. K. Murray;F. Cheng;L. Clark;J. H. Barnett

  • Longitudinal associations between childhood and adulthood externalizing and internalizing psychopathology and adolescent substance use

    J. Miettunen;G. K. Murray;P. B. Jones;P. Mäki

  • How dopamine dysregulation leads to psychotic symptoms? Abnormal mesolimbic and mesostriatal prediction error signalling in psychosis

    G K Murray;P R Corlett;L Clark;M Pessiglione

Frequent Co-Authors

Jouko Miettunen
Jouko Miettunen Oulu University Hospital
Matti Isohanni
Matti Isohanni University of Oulu
Peter Jones
Peter Jones University of Cambridge
Paul C. Fletcher
Paul C. Fletcher University of Cambridge
Edward T. Bullmore
Edward T. Bullmore King's College London
Irma Moilanen
Irma Moilanen University of Oulu
Vesa Kiviniemi
Vesa Kiviniemi Oulu University Hospital
Trevor W. Robbins
Trevor W. Robbins University of Cambridge
John Suckling
John Suckling University of Cambridge
Anja Taanila
Anja Taanila University of Oulu

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology opens the door to a wide range of online degree options and career paths. Today, students can choose flexible formats—whether starting with a bachelor’s or advancing to a specialized graduate program. Accredited online psychology degree programs offer a foundational understanding, preparing graduates for entry-level roles or further study.

For those interested in workplace dynamics or organizational development, an online organizational psychology masters program can provide essential skills for HR, consulting, and leadership careers.

Students aiming for clinical practice or advanced research might consider accredited psyd online programs, which focus on assessment, therapy, and direct client care. Additionally, those passionate about behavioral interventions for autism or related fields can pursue aba doctorate programs to become experts in applied behavior analysis.

Each pathway offers its own set of opportunities, allowing students to match their academic choices with their desired careers in the diverse world of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Graham K. Murray

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles