World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Mathematics
Chile
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
42
Citations
6546
World Ranking
1809
National Ranking
2

Raimund Bürger publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raimund Bürger sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 216 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Raimund Bürger D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raimund Bürger sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Mathematics in Chile Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Mathematics in Chile Leader Award

Overview

Raimund Bürger is affiliated with the University of Concepción in Chile and has contributed extensively to the fields of Engineering and Environmental Science. Their research spans a variety of subfields including Computational Mechanics, Civil and Structural Engineering, Water Science and Technology, Mechanics of Materials, and Numerical Analysis.

The scientist's research primarily focuses on topics related to Tailings Management and Properties, Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics, Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques, Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics, Rock Mechanics and Modeling, Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows, and Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal.

Raimund Bürger has published numerous papers in a range of scientific journals. Some recent publications include:

  • Optimization of flocculation and settling parameters of tailings slurry by response surface methodology, 2020, Minerals Engineering
  • Effect of interparticle interactions on the yield stress of thickened flocculated copper mineral tailings slurry, 2021, Powder Technology
  • Research on floc structure and physical properties based on pipeline flocculation, 2023, Journal of Water Process Engineering
  • An Efficient Third-Order WENO Scheme with Unconditionally Optimal Accuracy, 2020, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
  • Utilization of rice straw as an inhibitor of strength deterioration of sulfide-rich cemented paste backfill, 2023, Journal of Materials Research and Technology

The venues where Raimund Bürger frequently publishes include arXiv (Cornell University), Minerals Engineering, Powder Technology, Computational and Applied Mathematics, and Minerals.

Collaboration is a significant aspect of their work, with frequent co-authors such as Zhuen Ruan, Stefan Diehl, Aixiang Wu, Julio Careaga, and Luis Miguel Villada.

Best Publications

  • Sedimentation and Thickening : Phenomenological Foundation and Mathematical Theory

    María Cristina Bustos;Fernando Concha;Raimund Bürger;Elmer M Tory

  • Strongly Degenerate Parabolic-Hyperbolic Systems Modeling Polydisperse Sedimentation with Compression

    Elmer M. Tory;Kenneth H. Karlsen;Raimund Bürger;Stefan Berres

  • A consistent modelling methodology for secondary settling tanks in wastewater treatment

    Raimund Bürger;Stefan Diehl;Ingmar Nopens

  • Sedimentation and Thickening

    María Cristina Bustos;Fernando Concha;Raimund Bürger;Elmer M. Tory

  • A Model of Continuous Sedimentation of Flocculated Suspensions in Clarifier-Thickener Units

    Raimund Bürger;Kenneth H. Karlsen;John D. Towers

  • Mathematical model and numerical simulation of the settling of flocculated suspensions

    R. Bürger;F. Concha

  • Well-posedness in BV t and convergence of a difference scheme for continuous sedimentation in ideal clarifier-thickener units

    R. Bürger;K. H. Karlsen;N. H Risebro;J. D. Towers

  • Model equations for gravitational sedimentation-consolidation processes

    R. Bürger;W.L. Wendland;F. Concha

  • Sedimentation and suspension flows: Historical perspective and some recent developments

    Raimund Bürger;Wolfgang L. Wendland

  • A FAMILY OF NUMERICAL SCHEMES FOR KINEMATIC FLOWS WITH DISCONTINUOUS FLUX

    R. Bürger;A. García;K. H. Karlsen;J. D. Towers

  • An Engquist-Osher-Type Scheme for Conservation Laws with Discontinuous Flux Adapted to Flux Connections

    Raimund Bürger;Kenneth H. Karlsen;John D. Towers

  • Applications of the phenomenological theory to several published experimental cases of sedimentation processes

    R. Bürger;F. Concha;F.M. Tiller

  • A mathematical model for batch and continuous thickening of flocculated suspensions in vessels with varying cross-section

    Raimund Bürger;J. J. R Damasceno;Kenneth Hvistendahl Karlsen;Kenneth Hvistendahl Karlsen

  • Phenomenological model of filtration processes: 1. Cake formation and expression

    R. Bürger;F. Concha;K. H. Karlsen

  • Numerical methods for the simulation of the settling of flocculated suspensions

    R. Bürger;S. Evje;K. Hvistendahl Karlsen;K.-A. Lie

  • On nonlocal conservation laws modelling sedimentation

    F Betancourt;R Bürger;K H Karlsen;E M Tory

  • A consistent modelling methodology for secondary settling tanks: A reliable numerical method.

    Raimund Bürger;Stefan Diehl;Sebastian Farås;Ingmar Nopens

  • On Strongly Degenerate Convection–Diffusion Problems Modeling Sedimentation–Consolidation Processes

    R. Bürger;S. Evje;K.Hvistendahl Karlsen

  • Numerical simulation of the settling of polydisperse suspensions of spheres

    R. Bürger;F. Concha;K.-K. Fjelde;K.Hvistendahl Karlsen

  • Settling velocities of particulate systems: 11. Comparison of the phenomenological sedimentation–consolidation model with published experimental results

    P. Garrido;R. Bürger;F. Concha

  • The initial-boundary value problem for a scalar conservation law

    María Cristina Bustos;Fernando Concha;Raimund Bürger;Elmer M. Tory

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth H. Karlsen
Kenneth H. Karlsen University of Oslo
Ingmar Nopens
Ingmar Nopens Ghent University
Wolfgang L. Wendland
Wolfgang L. Wendland University of Stuttgart
Kai Schneider
Kai Schneider Aix-Marseille University
Nils Henrik Risebro
Nils Henrik Risebro University of Oslo
Peter A. Vanrolleghem
Peter A. Vanrolleghem Université Laval
Gerardo Chowell
Gerardo Chowell Georgia State University
Giovanni Russo
Giovanni Russo University of Catania
Shizhi Qian
Shizhi Qian Old Dominion University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Mathematics, branching into related online degrees can open doors to diverse career opportunities. For example, professionals aiming to combine analytical skills with business leadership might consider the best 1 year dba program online, which offers a fast track to advanced expertise in data and business administration.

Those looking to enter finance or improve their quantitative finance knowledge can benefit from finding a cheap online masters in finance. This degree can complement mathematical skills with financial theory and practical applications, opening pathways in banking, investment, and risk management.

Combining mathematics with managerial abilities, the quickest online mba programs provide an efficient route to leadership roles across industries. These accelerated MBAs are ideal for students who want to advance their careers without lengthy time commitments.

Finally, for those intrigued by data-driven consumer insights and strategic communication, a masters degree in marketing can offer lucrative and dynamic career options. This degree leverages mathematical and statistical knowledge to optimize marketing campaigns and business growth.

Best Scientists Citing Raimund Bürger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles