World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gabriel N. Gatica

Gabriel N. Gatica

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
38
Citations
5592
World Ranking
2367
National Ranking
4

Gabriel N. Gatica publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gabriel N. Gatica sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 217 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Gabriel N. Gatica D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gabriel N. Gatica sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gabriel N. Gatica is affiliated with the University of Concepción in Chile and specializes in engineering, focusing primarily on computational mechanics, mechanics of materials, and computational theory and mathematics. Their research encompasses multiple subfields including electrical and electronic engineering as well as biomedical engineering.

The scientist's work addresses a range of advanced topics in computational mathematics and engineering. Key areas of study include:

  • Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
  • Numerical methods in engineering
  • Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
  • Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
  • Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
  • Granular flow and fluidized beds
  • Numerical methods in inverse problems

Gabriel N. Gatica has contributed to research published in several established journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Computers & Mathematics with Applications
  • CALCOLO
  • Journal of Scientific Computing
  • Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics
  • ESAIM Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis

Their recent papers showcase work on mixed finite element methods, Banach space analyses, and coupled problems in fluid dynamics and mathematical modeling. Notable papers are:

  • A Banach spaces-based analysis of a new fully-mixed finite element method for the Boussinesq problem, 2020, ESAIM Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis
  • A conforming mixed finite element method for the Navier-Stokes/Darcy-Forchheimer coupled problem, 2020, ESAIM Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis
  • Banach spaces-based analysis of a fully-mixed finite element method for the steady-state model of fluidized beds, 2021, Computers & Mathematics with Applications
  • New mixed finite element methods for the coupled Stokes and Poisson-Nernst-Planck equations in Banach spaces, 2023, ESAIM. Mathematical modelling and numerical analysis
  • On the continuous and discrete well-posedness of perturbed saddle-point formulations in Banach spaces, 2022, Computers & Mathematics with Applications

Collaboration is a significant aspect of their research activity. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Sergio Caucao
  • Ricardo Ruiz-Baier
  • Cristian Inzunza
  • Ricardo Oyarzúa
  • Salim Meddahi

Best Publications

  • A Simple Introduction to the Mixed Finite Element Method

    Gabriel N. Gatica

  • A conforming mixed finite-element method for the coupling of fluid flow with porous media flow

    Gabriel N. Gatica;Salim Meddahi;Ricardo Oyarzúa

  • Analysis of a velocity–pressure–pseudostress formulation for the stationary Stokes equations ☆

    Gabriel N. Gatica;Antonio Márquez;Manuel A. Sánchez

  • Analysis of fully-mixed finite element methods for the Stokes-Darcy coupled problem

    Gabriel N. Gatica;Ricardo Oyarzúa;Francisco-Javier Sayas

  • A Residual-Based A Posteriori Error Estimator for the Stokes-Darcy Coupled Problem

    Ivo Babuška;Gabriel N. Gatica

  • A mixed virtual element method for the pseudostress–velocity formulation of the Stokes problem

    Ernesto Cáceres;Gabriel N. Gatica

  • A Simple Introduction to the Mixed Finite Element Method: Theory and Applications

    Gabriel N Gatica

  • On the coupled BEM and FEM for a nonlinear exterior Dirichlet problem in R2

    Gabriel N. Gatica;George C. Hsiao

  • Boundary-field Equation Methods For a Class of Nonlinear Problems

    Gabriel N Gatica;G. C. Hsiao

  • On the numerical analysis of nonlinear twofold saddle point problems

    Gabriel N. Gatica;Norbert Heuer;Salim Meddahi

  • On the mixed finite element method with Lagrange multipliers

    Ivo M Babuska;Gabriel N. Gatica

  • Analysis of a new augmented mixed finite element method for linear elasticity allowing $\mathbb{RT}_0$-$\mathbb{P}_1$-$\mathbb{P}_0$ approximations

    Gabriel N. Gatica

  • A residual-based a posteriori error estimator for a fully-mixed formulation of the Stokes–Darcy coupled problem

    Gabriel N. Gatica;Ricardo Oyarzúa;Francisco-Javier Sayas

  • An A Posteriori Error Estimate for the Local Discontinuous Galerkin Method Applied to Linear and Nonlinear Diffusion Problems

    Rommel Bustinza;Gabriel N. Gatica;Bernardo Cockburn

  • A Local Discontinuous Galerkin Method for Nonlinear Diffusion Problems with Mixed Boundary Conditions

    Rommel Bustinza;Gabriel N. Gatica

  • A residual based a posteriori error estimator for an augmented mixed finite element method in linear elasticity

    Tomás P. Barrios;Gabriel N. Gatica;María González;Norbert Heuer

  • Coupling of mixed finite elements and boundary elements for linear and nonlinear elliptic problems

    Gabriel N. Gatica;Wolfgang L. Wendland

  • Augmented Mixed Finite Element Methods for the Stationary Stokes Equations

    Leonardo E. Figueroa;Gabriel N. Gatica;Antonio Márquez

  • A mixed virtual element method for the Brinkman problem

    Ernesto Cáceres;Gabriel N. Gatica;Filánder A. Sequeira

  • A low-order mixed finite element method for a class of quasi-Newtonian Stokes flows. Part II: a posteriori error analysis

    Gabriel N. Gatica;Marı́a González;Salim Meddahi

  • A mixed virtual element method for the Navier–Stokes equations

    Gabriel N. Gatica;Mauricio Munar;Filánder A. Sequeira

  • An augmented mixed-primal finite element method for a coupled flow-transport problem

    Mario Alvarez;Mario Alvarez;Gabriel N. Gatica;Ricardo Ruiz–Baier

Frequent Co-Authors

Ernst P. Stephan
Ernst P. Stephan University of Hannover
Wolfgang L. Wendland
Wolfgang L. Wendland University of Stuttgart
Ivo Babuška
Ivo Babuška The University of Texas at Austin
Bernardo Cockburn
Bernardo Cockburn University of Minnesota
Reinhold Schneider
Reinhold Schneider Technical University of Berlin
Raimund Bürger
Raimund Bürger University of Concepción
Helmut Harbrecht
Helmut Harbrecht University of Basel

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their expertise beyond Mathematics, numerous flexible online programs offer viable career pathways. For those looking to combine business acumen with quantitative skills, exploring shortest MBA program online options can provide a quick, practical route to leadership roles in finance, tech, or analytics.

Finance professionals with a strong math background may benefit from pursuing the best online masters in finance to deepen their understanding of financial modeling and risk management, which can lead to rewarding careers in banking or investment.

For graduates aiming at executive roles, online dba programs online offer advanced business leadership training with a focus on practical research and strategy, ideal for those seeking high-level management positions.

Additionally, combining analytical strengths with creativity is possible through marketing masters programs that emphasize data-driven decision-making, opening doors to careers in digital marketing and market analysis.

Best Scientists Citing Gabriel N. Gatica

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles