World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
37
Citations
6443
World Ranking
2482
National Ranking
1038

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
37
Citations
6436
World Ranking
8325
National Ranking
2306

Ivan Yotov publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ivan Yotov sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 128 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Ivan Yotov D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ivan Yotov sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ivan Yotov is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States and focuses their research primarily in the field of Engineering. Their work encompasses several subfields including Computational Mechanics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mechanics of Materials, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Numerical Analysis.

The main topics of Ivan Yotov's research include:

  • Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
  • Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
  • Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
  • Numerical methods in engineering
  • Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
  • Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
  • Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows

The scientist has contributed to various publication venues, with recurrent appearances in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
  • Computational Geosciences
  • IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis
  • SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis

Some of the recent papers authored or coauthored by Ivan Yotov include:

  • The Biot-Stokes coupling using total pressure: Formulation, analysis and application to interfacial flow in the eye (2021, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering)
  • A Banach space mixed formulation for the unsteady Brinkman-Forchheimer equations (2020, IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis)
  • A mixed elasticity formulation for fluid-poroelastic structure interaction (2021, ESAIM. Mathematical modelling and numerical analysis)
  • A three-field Banach spaces-based mixed formulation for the unsteady Brinkman-Forchheimer equations (2022, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering)
  • A multipoint stress-flux mixed finite element method for the Stokes-Biot model (2022, Numerische Mathematik)

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Sergio Caucao
  • Rainer Helmig
  • Tongtong Li
  • Wietse M. Boon
  • Dennis Gläser

Best Publications

  • Coupling Fluid Flow with Porous Media Flow

    William J. Layton;Friedhelm Schieweck;Ivan Yotov

  • Mixed Finite Elements for Elliptic Problems with Tensor Coefficients as Cell-Centered Finite Differences

    Todd Arbogast;Mary F. Wheeler;Ivan Yotov

  • A Multiscale Mortar Mixed Finite Element Method

    Todd Arbogast;Gergina Pencheva;Mary F. Wheeler;Ivan Yotov

  • Locally Conservative Coupling of Stokes and Darcy Flows

    Béatrice Rivière;Ivan Yotov

  • Mixed Finite Element Methods on Nonmatching Multiblock Grids

    Todd Arbogast;Lawrence C. Cowsar;Mary F. Wheeler;Ivan Yotov

  • A Multipoint Flux Mixed Finite Element Method

    Mary F. Wheeler;Ivan Yotov

  • Enhanced Cell-Centered Finite Differences for Elliptic Equations on General Geometry

    Todd Arobogast;Clint N. Dawson;Philip T. Keenan;Mary F. Wheeler

  • Mortar Upscaling for Multiphase Flow in Porous Media

    Maøgorzata Peszy;Mary F. Wheeler;Ivan Yotov

  • Local flux mimetic finite difference methods

    Konstantin Lipnikov;Mikhail Shashkov;Ivan Yotov

  • A New Generation EOS Compositional Reservoir Simulator: Part I - Formulation and Discretization

    P. Wang;I. Yotov;M. Wheeler;T. Arbogast

  • Robust Discretization of Flow in Fractured Porous Media

    Wietse Boon;Jan Martin Nordbotten;Ivan Yotov

  • Convergence of a symmetric MPFA method on quadrilateral grids

    Ivar Aavatsmark;Geirte T. Eigestad;Runhildk A. Klausen;Runhildk A. Klausen;M. F. Wheeler

  • Coupling Stokes-Darcy Flow with Transport

    Danail Vassilev;Ivan Yotov

  • A multipoint flux mixed finite element method on distorted quadrilaterals and hexahedra

    Mary Wheeler;Guangri Xue;Ivan Yotov

  • Partitioning strategies for the interaction of a fluid with a poroelastic material based on a Nitsche’s coupling approach

    M. Bukač;I. Yotov;R. Zakerzadeh;Paolo Zunino

  • Mixed finite element methods for flow in porous media

    Ivan Petrov Yotov

  • A Multipoint Flux Mixed Finite Element Method on Hexahedra

    Ross Ingram;Mary F. Wheeler;Ivan Yotov

  • Stochastic collocation and mixed finite elements for flow in porous media

    Benjamin A Ganis;Hector Klie;Mary F Wheeler;Tim Wildey

  • A Lagrange multiplier method for a Stokes–Biot fluid–poroelastic structure interaction model

    Ilona Ambartsumyan;Eldar Khattatov;Ivan Yotov;Paolo Zunino;Paolo Zunino

  • Implementation of a mortar mixed finite element method using a Multiscale Flux Basis

    Benjamin Ganis;Ivan Yotov

  • A multiscale mortar multipoint flux mixed finite element method

    Mary Fanett Wheeler;Guangri Xue;Ivan Yotov

  • Superconvergence of the Velocity in Mimetic Finite Difference Methods on Quadrilaterals

    M. Berndt;K. Lipnikov;M. Shashkov;M. F. Wheeler

Frequent Co-Authors

Mary F. Wheeler
Mary F. Wheeler The University of Texas at Austin
Jan M. Nordbotten
Jan M. Nordbotten University of Bergen
Konstantin Lipnikov
Konstantin Lipnikov Los Alamos National Laboratory
Yoram Vodovotz
Yoram Vodovotz University of Pittsburgh
Mikhail Shashkov
Mikhail Shashkov Los Alamos National Laboratory
Clint Dawson
Clint Dawson The University of Texas at Austin
Shuyu Sun
Shuyu Sun King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Béatrice Rivière
Béatrice Rivière Rice University
Bin Wang
Bin Wang University of Hawaii at Manoa
Jonathan E. Rubin
Jonathan E. Rubin University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students pursuing a Mathematics degree in the USA often explore related fields that complement their analytical skills. For those interested in blending business acumen with technical expertise, marketing graduate programs offer a valuable pathway. These programs emphasize data-driven decision-making, a natural fit for math graduates.

Many professionals seek accelerated options such as a one year MBA program to quickly boost leadership skills and business knowledge. The condensed format is ideal for mathematics students wanting to fast-track their careers.

For students concerned about credit transfer, several top-tier schools now accept transfer credits for online MBA programs. Exploring transfer credits for online MBA programs can provide flexibility and reduce both time and cost.

The rising demand for data expertise also makes analytics masters programs a strategic option. These programs hone skills in interpreting complex data sets, a perfect extension for mathematics graduates aiming for careers in data science and analytics.

Best Scientists Citing Ivan Yotov

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles