World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
58
Citations
10574
World Ranking
651
National Ranking
328

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
63
Citations
13071
World Ranking
1799
National Ranking
583

Clint Dawson publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clint Dawson sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 233 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Clint Dawson D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clint Dawson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - SIAM Fellow For fundamental contributions to the development of computational models of coastal storm surges and other complex geophysical phenomena.

Overview

Clint Dawson is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Engineering, with specific interests in Atmospheric Science, Oceanography, Earth-Surface Processes, Computational Mechanics, and Global and Planetary Change.

Their recent publications include various papers addressing flood prediction, storm surge, and climate systems. Notable papers are:

  • Exploring the best sequence LSTM modeling architecture for flood prediction (2020, Neural Computing and Applications)
  • Towards an End-to-End Analysis and Prediction System for Weather, Climate, and Marine Applications in the Red Sea (2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society)
  • Developing a Modeling Framework to Simulate Compound Flooding: When Storm Surge Interacts With Riverine Flow (2021, Frontiers in Climate)
  • The presence of Superfund sites as a determinant of life expectancy in the United States (2021, Nature Communications)
  • A framework for flexible peak storm surge prediction (2023, Coastal Engineering)

Dawson has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Eirik Valseth
  • Mark Loveland
  • Troy Butler
  • Benjamin Pachev
  • Soumyajit Gupta

The scientist's work appears most often in the following publication venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Computational Geosciences
  • Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
  • Coastal Engineering
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Main topics of research cover the following areas:

  • Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
  • Coastal and Marine Dynamics
  • Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics

Clint Dawson received recognition as an SIAM Fellow in 2016 for fundamental contributions to the development of computational models of coastal storm surges and other complex geophysical phenomena.

Best Publications

  • Modeling hurricane waves and storm surge using integrally-coupled, scalable computations

    J. C. Dietrich;M. Zijlema;J. J. Westerink;L. H. Holthuijsen

  • Compatible algorithms for coupled flow and transport

    Clint Dawson;Shuyu Sun;Mary F. Wheeler

  • Performance of the Unstructured-Mesh, SWAN+ADCIRC Model in Computing Hurricane Waves and Surge

    J. C. Dietrich;J. C. Dietrich;S. Tanaka;J. J. Westerink;Clinton N Dawson

  • A Finite Difference Domain Decomposition Algorithm for Numerical Solution of the Heat Equation

    Clint Dawson;Qiang Du;Todd Dupont

  • DesignSafe: New Cyberinfrastructure for Natural Hazards Engineering

    Ellen M. Rathje;Clint Dawson;Jamie E. Padgett;Jean-Paul Pinelli

  • An unsplit, higher order Godunov method for scalar conservation laws in multiple dimensions

    John B. Bell;Clint N. Dawson;Gregory R. Shubin

  • Hindcast and validation of Hurricane Ike (2008) waves, forerunner, and storm surge

    M. E. Hope;J. J. Westerink;A. B. Kennedy;P. C. Kerr

  • A Two-Grid Finite Difference Scheme for Nonlinear Parabolic Equations

    Clint N. Dawson;Mary F. Wheeler;Carol S. Woodward

  • A discontinuous Galerkin method for two-dimensional flow and transport in shallow water

    Vadym Aizinger;Clinton N Dawson

  • Enhanced Cell-Centered Finite Differences for Elliptic Equations on General Geometry

    Todd Arobogast;Clint N. Dawson;Philip T. Keenan;Mary F. Wheeler

  • Some improved error estimates for the modified method of characteristics

    C. N. Dawson;T. F. Russell;M. F. Wheeler

  • Characterizing hurricane storm surge behavior in Galveston Bay using the SWAN+ADCIRC model

    Antonia Sebastian;Jennifer M Proft;J. Casey Dietrich;Wei Du

  • hp Discontinuous Galerkin methods for advection dominated problems in shallow water flow

    Ethan J. Kubatko;Joannes J. Westerink;Clinton N Dawson

  • A wetting and drying treatment for the Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin solution to the shallow water equations

    Shintaro Bunya;Ethan J. Kubatko;Joannes J. Westerink;Clinton N Dawson

  • Analysis of Expanded Mixed Finite Element Methods for a Nonlinear Parabolic Equation Modeling Flow into Variably Saturated Porous Media

    Carol S. Woodward;Clint N. Dawson

  • Godunov-mixed methods for advection-diffusion equations in multidimensions

    Clint N. Dawson

  • An Operator-Splitting Method for Advection-Diffusion-Reaction Problems

    M.F. Wheeler;C.N. Dawson

  • A Godunov-type finite volume method for the system of shallow water equations

    S. Chippada;Clinton N Dawson;M. L. Martinez;Mary F Wheeler

  • A New Generation EOS Compositional Reservoir Simulator: Part I - Formulation and Discretization

    P. Wang;I. Yotov;M. Wheeler;T. Arbogast

  • High Resolution Schemes for Conservation Laws with Locally Varying Time Steps

    Clint Dawson;Robert Kirby

  • The future of coastal and estuarine modeling: Findings from a workshop

    Oliver B. Fringer;Clint N. Dawson;Ruoying He;David K. Ralston

Frequent Co-Authors

Mary F. Wheeler
Mary F. Wheeler The University of Texas at Austin
Joannes J. Westerink
Joannes J. Westerink University of Notre Dame
Ibrahim Hoteit
Ibrahim Hoteit King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Omar M. Knio
Omar M. Knio King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Todd Dupont
Todd Dupont University of Chicago
Ivan Yotov
Ivan Yotov University of Pittsburgh
Richard A. Luettich
Richard A. Luettich University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Matthew Lease
Matthew Lease The University of Texas at Austin
Jamie E. Padgett
Jamie E. Padgett Rice University
Ellen M. Rathje
Ellen M. Rathje The University of Texas at Austin

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those studying Mathematics in the USA, expanding into related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many students consider business-oriented programs that complement their analytical skills, such as the easiest mba to get into. These programs often provide foundational knowledge in management while remaining accessible.

Alternatively, professionals looking for flexibility might explore the easiest mba online options. These programs combine convenience with career advancement, making them popular among working students.

For advanced academic pursuits, pursuing the cheapest online dba offers a cost-effective way to gain expertise in business administration at the doctoral level. This can be especially beneficial for math graduates aiming for leadership roles.

Additionally, considering specialized degrees like a masters in finance online programs can leverage mathematical proficiency in financial analysis and modeling, opening pathways in banking, investment, and corporate finance.

Best Scientists Citing Clint Dawson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles