World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
54
Citations
11502
World Ranking
837
National Ranking
407

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
54
Citations
11750
World Ranking
3165
National Ranking
941

Richard E. Ewing publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard E. Ewing sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 237 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Richard E. Ewing D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard E. Ewing sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1995 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Richard E. Ewing was affiliated with Texas A&M University in the United States. Their research contributions primarily focused on the field of Engineering, with specialization in Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mechanics of Materials, and Computational Mechanics.

The main topics addressed in their work included:

  • Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
  • Composite Material Mechanics
  • Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics

Ewing's publication record includes recent papers such as:

  • "An efficient approach for upscaling properties of composite materials with high contrast of coefficients," published in 2022 by the Publication Server of Kaiserslautern University of Technology
  • "Issue Information," published in 2023 in the journal Near Surface Geophysics

The venues where their work appeared most frequently included:

  • Publication Server of Kaiserslautern University of Technology (Kaiserslautern University of Technology)
  • Near Surface Geophysics

Frequent collaborators in their research were:

  • Suzanne L. Weekes
  • Oleg Iliev
  • Raytcho Lazarov
  • Iryna Rybak
  • J. Willems

Richard E. Ewing was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1995.

Best Publications

  • An Eulerian-Lagrangian localized adjoint method for the advection-diffusion equation

    Michael A. Celia;Thomas F. Russell;Ismael Herrera;Richard E. Ewing

  • The approximation of the pressure by a mixed method in the simulation of miscible displacement

    Jim Jr. Douglas;Richard E. Ewing;Mary Fanett Wheeler

  • The Mathematics of Reservoir Simulation

    Richard E. Ewing

  • Convergence analysis of an approximation of miscible displacement in porous media by mixed finite elements and a modified method of characteristics

    Richard E. Ewing;Thomas F. Russell;Mary Fanett Wheeler

  • On the Accuracy of the Finite Volume Element Method Based on Piecewise Linear Polynomials

    Richard E. Ewing;Tao Lin;Yanping Lin

  • Accurate multiscale finite element methods for two-phase flow simulations

    Y. Efendiev;V. Ginting;T. Hou;R. Ewing

  • A time-discretization procedure for a mixed finite element approximation of miscible displacement in porous media

    Jim Jr. Douglas;Richard E. Ewing;Mary Fanett Wheeler

  • A summary of numerical methods for time-dependent advection-dominated partial differential equations

    Richard E. Ewing;Hong Wang

  • Inverse problems in partial differential equations

    David L. Colton;Richard E. Ewing;William Rundell

  • Simulation of miscible displacement using mixed methods and a modified method of characteristics

    R.E. Ewing;T.F. Russell;M.F. Wheeler

  • Galerkin Methods for Miscible Displacement Problems in Porous Media

    Richard E. Ewing;Mary Fanett Wheeler

  • Superconvergence of the velocity along the Gauss lines in mixed finite element methods

    R. E. Ewing;R. D. Lazarov;J. Wang

  • A preconditioning technique for the efficient solution of problems with local grid refinement

    James H. Bramble;Richard E. Ewing;Joseph E. Pasciak;Alfred H. Schatz

  • Multiphysics and Multiscale Methods for Modeling Fluid Flow Through Naturally Fractured Carbonate Karst Reservoirs

    Peter Popov;Guan Qin;Linfeng Bi;Yalchin Efendiev

  • Finite volume element approximations of nonlocal reactive flows in porous media

    Richard Ewing;Raytcho Lazarov;Yanping Lin

  • Local refinement techniques for elliptic problems on cell-centered grids. I. Error analysis

    R. E. Ewing;R. D. Lazarov;P. S. Vassilevski

  • An ELLAM Scheme for Advection-Diffusion Equations in Two Dimensions

    Hong Wang;Helge K. Dahle.;Richard E. Ewing;Magne S. Espedal

  • Comparison of Various Formulations of Three-Phase Flow in Porous Media

    Zhangxin Chen;Richard E. Ewing

  • Multiscale Methods for Modeling Fluid Flow Through Naturally Fractured Carbonate Karst Reservoirs

    Peter Popov;Guan Qin;Linfeng Bi;Yalchin Efendiev

  • The immersed finite volume element methods for the elliptic interface problems

    Richard E. Ewing;Zhilin Li;Tao Lin;Yanping Lin

Frequent Co-Authors

Raytcho Lazarov
Raytcho Lazarov Texas A&M University
Yalchin Efendiev
Yalchin Efendiev Texas A&M University
Zhangxin Chen
Zhangxin Chen University of Calgary
Yanping Lin
Yanping Lin Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Mary F. Wheeler
Mary F. Wheeler The University of Texas at Austin
Chris R. Johnson
Chris R. Johnson University of Utah
Panayot S. Vassilevski
Panayot S. Vassilevski Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Joseph E. Pasciak
Joseph E. Pasciak Texas A&M University
Michael A. Celia
Michael A. Celia Princeton University
Richard S. Falk
Richard S. Falk Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Mathematics in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities. Many graduates find that combining strong quantitative skills with business knowledge enhances their employability. For example, pursuing marketing graduate programs online can provide a strategic edge in industries that value data-driven decision making. To explore affordable options that also offer solid career returns, check out marketing graduate programs.

For those interested in advancing into leadership roles, enrolling in a one year MBA program allows math graduates to quickly gain essential business and management skills. These accelerated programs are ideal for individuals looking to transition efficiently from technical roles to management positions. Find the latest options by browsing this list of one year mba program offerings.

Moreover, flexibility in education is crucial for many learners. Online MBAs that accept transfer credits can reduce time and cost, appealing to students with prior graduate coursework. To see programs that accommodate such credit transfers, consider reviewing this reliable guide on online mba with transfer credits accepted.

Additionally, data analytics has become a vital complement to mathematics skills. A specialized data analytics masters degree equips students with the expertise to analyze complex datasets and drive insights across sectors. Those interested in this growing field can find top-ranked options by visiting data analytics masters programs.

Best Scientists Citing Richard E. Ewing

Recently Published Articles