World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
40
Citations
9667
World Ranking
2002
National Ranking
846

Richard S. Falk publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard S. Falk sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 87 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Richard S. Falk D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard S. Falk sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of the American Mathematical Society For contributions to numerical analysis and for service to the mathematical community.
  • 2012 - SIAM Fellow For contributions to the understanding of the stability and convergence properties of the finite element method, and for service to the numerical analysis community.

Overview

Richard S. Falk is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research contributions primarily focus on mathematics, with an emphasis on computational mechanics, geometry and topology, computational theory and mathematics, mathematical physics, and numerical analysis.

The scientist's research addresses a range of topics within mathematics. Notable areas include:

  • Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
  • Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
  • Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
  • Nonlinear Waves and Solitons
  • Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
  • Polynomial and algebraic computation
  • Iterative Methods for Nonlinear Equations

Richard S. Falk has contributed several papers published in various venues. Recent publications include:

  • The Bubble Transform and the de Rham Complex, 2022, Foundations of Computational Mathematics
  • Hidden positivity and a new approach to numerical computation of Hausdorff dimension: higher order methods, 2021, Journal of Fractal Geometry Mathematics of Fractals and Related Topics
  • Construction of polynomial preserving cochain extensions by blending, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • The Bubble Transform and the de Rham Complex, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Hidden Positivity and a New Approach to Numerical Computation of Hausdorff Dimension: Higher Order Methods, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

Their work has appeared frequently in the following publication venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Foundations of Computational Mathematics
  • Journal of Fractal Geometry Mathematics of Fractals and Related Topics
  • Mathematics of Computation

Collaboration is evident in their frequent co-authors, which include:

  • Ragnar Winther
  • Roger D. Nussbaum

Recognition of their work includes being named a Fellow of the American Mathematical Society in 2019 for contributions to numerical analysis and for service to the mathematical community.

Additionally, Richard S. Falk was recognized as a SIAM Fellow in 2012 for work related to the stability and convergence properties of the finite element method, along with their service to the numerical analysis community.

Best Publications

  • Finite element exterior calculus, homological techniques, and applications

    Douglas N. Arnold;Richard S. Falk;Ragnar Winther

  • Finite element exterior calculus: From hodge theory to numerical stability

    Douglas N. Arnold;Richard S. Falk;Ragnar Winther

  • Multigrid in H(div) and H(curl)

    Douglas N. Arnold;Richard S. Falk;Ragnar Winther

  • Error estimates for the approximation of a class of variational inequalities

    Richard S. Falk

  • A uniformly accurate finite element method for the Reissner-Mindlin plate

    D. N. Arnold;R. S. Falk

  • Approximation of a class of optimal control problems with order of convergence estimates

    Richard S. Falk

  • Mixed finite element methods for linear elasticity with weakly imposed symmetry

    Douglas N. Arnold;Richard S. Falk;Ragnar Winther

  • Error estimates for mixed methods

    R. S. Falk;J. E. Osborn

  • Approximation by quadrilateral finite elements

    Douglas N. Arnold;Daniele Boffi;Richard S. Falk

  • Basic principles of mixed Virtual Element Methods

    F. Brezzi;Richard S. Falk;L. Donatella Marini

  • Quadrilateral H (div) Finite Elements

    Douglas N. Arnold;Daniele Boffi;Richard S. Falk

  • Preconditioning in H (div) and applications

    Douglas N. Arnold;Richard S. Falk;R. Winther

  • Mixed Finite Elements, Compatibility Conditions, and Applications

    Daniele Boffi;Franco Brezzi;Leszek F. Demkowicz;Ricardo G. Durán

  • Stability of higher-order Hood-Taylor methods

    Franco Brezzi;Richard S. Falk

  • Nonconforming finite element methods for the equations of linear elasticity

    Richard S. Falk

  • Stokes Complexes and the Construction of Stable Finite Elements with Pointwise Mass Conservation

    Richard S. Falk;Michael Neilan

  • Asymptotic analysis of the boundary layer for the Reissner-Mindlin plate model

    Douglas N. Arnold;Richard S. Falk

  • The boundary layer for the reissner-mindlin plate model

    Douglas N. Arnold;Richard S. Falk

  • Explicit Finite Element Methods for Symmetric Hyperbolic Equations

    Richard S. Falk;Gerard R. Richter

  • A new mixed formulation for elasticity

    Douglas N. Arnold;Richard S. Falk

  • Approximation by quadrilateral finite elements

    Douglas N. Arnold;Daniele Boffi;Richard S. Falk

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas N. Arnold
Douglas N. Arnold University of Minnesota
Ragnar Winther
Ragnar Winther University of Oslo
Roger D. Nussbaum
Roger D. Nussbaum Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Richard E. Ewing
Richard E. Ewing Texas A&M University
Franco Brezzi
Franco Brezzi National Research Council (CNR)
Daniele Boffi
Daniele Boffi King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Bernard D. Coleman
Bernard D. Coleman Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Peter Monk
Peter Monk University of Delaware
Michael Holst
Michael Holst University of California, San Diego
Harald Niederreiter
Harald Niederreiter Austrian Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Mathematics in the USA, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Many graduates complement their math skills with business knowledge by pursuing an fastest mba online to accelerate their entry into management roles.

Additionally, for those interested in combining analytical skills with marketing, earning one of the cheapest online marketing degree programs can offer a cost-effective pathway while ensuring strong earning potential in digital marketing and data analytics fields.

If time is a priority, some students opt for cheapest 1 year online mba programs, which allow rapid completion without sacrificing quality. These programs are ideal for those eager to advance quickly in competitive industries.

Transfer credits can also play a significant role in streamlining education. Many students benefit from online mba programs that accept transfer credits, helping reduce both time and tuition costs while enhancing flexibility in degree completion.

By leveraging these options, mathematics students can diversify their skill sets and unlock diverse career pathways in technology, finance, business, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Richard S. Falk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles