World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Joachim Schöberl

Joachim Schöberl

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
38
Citations
7037
World Ranking
2316
National Ranking
29

Joachim Schöberl publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joachim Schöberl sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 160 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Joachim Schöberl D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joachim Schöberl sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joachim Schöberl is affiliated with TU Wien in Austria and works primarily in the field of engineering. Their research spans a range of subfields including computational mechanics, mechanics of materials, electrical and electronic engineering, biomedical engineering, and computational theory and mathematics.

The scientist's work covers multiple topics such as advanced numerical methods in computational mathematics, numerical methods in engineering, electromagnetic simulation and numerical methods, elasticity and material modeling, computational fluid dynamics and aerodynamics, advanced mathematical modeling in engineering, and electromagnetic scattering and analysis.

Joachim Schöberl has published extensively, with recent papers including:

  • Fully and semi-automated shape differentiation in NGSolve. (2021) - PubMed
  • Primal and mixed finite element formulations for the relaxed micromorphic model (2022) - Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
  • A hybrid H1×H(curl) finite element formulation for a relaxed micromorphic continuum model of antiplane shear (2021) - Computational Mechanics
  • Three-field mixed finite element methods for nonlinear elasticity (2021) - Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
  • Avoiding membrane locking with Regge interpolation (2020) - Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Their frequent co-authors include Michael Neunteufel, Jay Gopalakrishnan, Philip L. Lederer, Lukas Kogler, and Karl Hollaus.

Joachim Schöberl has contributed to publications across several venues with the highest number of papers in arXiv (Cornell University). Other notable publication venues include Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Journal of Computational Physics, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, and Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications.

Best Publications

  • NETGEN An advancing front 2D/3D-mesh generator based on abstract rules

    Joachim Schöberl

  • Equilibrated residual error estimator for edge elements

    Dietrich Braess;Joachim Schöberl

  • High order Nédélec elements with local complete sequence properties

    Joachim Schöberl;Sabine Zaglmayr

  • Symmetric Indefinite Preconditioners for Saddle Point Problems with Applications to PDE-Constrained Optimization Problems

    Joachim Schöberl;Walter Zulehner

  • High order exactly divergence-free Hybrid Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for unsteady incompressible flows

    Christoph Lehrenfeld;Joachim Schöberl

  • A posteriori error estimates for Maxwell equations

    Joachim Schöberl

  • Minimizing quadratic functions subject to bound constraints with the rate of convergence and finite termination

    Zdeněk Dostál;Joachim Schöberl

  • An algebraic multigrid method for finite element discretizations with edge elements

    Stefan Reitzinger;Joachim Schöberl

  • Equilibrated residual error estimates are p-robust

    Dietrich Braess;Veronika Pillwein;Joachim Schöberl

  • Crouzeix-Raviart type finite elements on anisotropic meshes

    Thomas Apel;Serge Nicaise;Joachim Schöberl

  • A hybrid mixed discontinuous Galerkin finite-element method for convection–diffusion problems

    Herbert Egger;Joachim Schöberl

  • Numerical analysis of nonlinear multiharmonic eddy current problems

    F. Bachinger;U. Langer;J. Schöberl

  • Finite-element simulation of wave propagation in periodic piezoelectric SAW structures

    M. Hofer;N. Finger;G. Kovacs;J. Schoberl

  • A 3D Finite Element Method for Flexible Multibody Systems

    Johannes Gerstmayr;Joachim Schöberl

  • On Schwarz-type Smoothers for Saddle Point Problems

    Joachim Schöberl;Walter Zulehner

  • Multigrid methods for a parameter dependent problem in primal variables

    Joachim Schöberl

  • TANGENTIAL-DISPLACEMENT AND NORMAL–NORMAL-STRESS CONTINUOUS MIXED FINITE ELEMENTS FOR ELASTICITY

    Astrid Pechstein;Joachim Schöberl

  • Divergence-free Reconstruction Operators for Pressure-Robust Stokes Discretizations with Continuous Pressure Finite Elements

    Philip L. Lederer;Alexander Linke;Christian Merdon;Joachim Schöberl

  • Solving the Signorini problem on the basis of domain decomposition techniques

    J. Schöberl

  • New shape functions for triangular p -FEM using integrated Jacobi polynomials

    S. Beuchler;J. Schöberl

  • Acoustic resonances in a high-lift configuration

    Stefan Hein;Thorsten Hohage;Werner Koch;Joachim Schöberl

Frequent Co-Authors

Ulrich Langer
Ulrich Langer Johannes Kepler University of Linz
Dietrich Braess
Dietrich Braess Ruhr University Bochum
Ilaria Perugia
Ilaria Perugia University of Vienna
Thorsten Hohage
Thorsten Hohage University of Göttingen
Rolf Stenberg
Rolf Stenberg Aalto University
Leszek Demkowicz
Leszek Demkowicz The University of Texas at Austin
Serge Nicaise
Serge Nicaise University Polytechnic Hauts-de-France
Ragnar Winther
Ragnar Winther University of Oslo
Carsten Carstensen
Carsten Carstensen Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mathematics in the USA opens many doors to related fields that leverage analytical and quantitative skills. For example, a masters data analytics degree is a popular choice for those interested in applying mathematical concepts to big data, helping businesses make data-driven decisions.

Many students also explore management and business leadership roles by considering an MBA. If you’re wondering what mba programs can i get into, there are numerous options tailored for different academic backgrounds, including those with STEM degrees.

For those balancing work and study, finding the easiest online mba program can be a practical way to advance your career without disrupting your current commitments. This flexibility attracts many math graduates aiming to enhance business acumen.

Additionally, advanced leadership roles may require a Doctor of Business Administration. Exploring the most online dba programs can provide affordable pathways to top executive positions, combining strategic business skills with analytical insights from a mathematics background.

Best Scientists Citing Joachim Schöberl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles