World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mathematics 48 1173 1003 525 415 98 20819

Todd Dupont publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Todd Dupont between 1968 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Todd Dupont published across 57 years, from 1968 to 2024, averaging 2 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 1974. 1 of the 113 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1968 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 1974. 1968: 2 publications 1969: 1 publication 1970: 2 publications 1971: 2 publications 1972: 3 publications 1973: 6 publications 1974: 14 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 4 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 5 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1968 2024

113 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Todd Dupont: publications per year, 1968 to 2024
Year Publications
1968 2
1969 1
1970 2
1971 2
1972 3
1973 6
1974 14
1975 3
1976 4
1977 2
1978 3
1979 2
1980 2
1981 1
1982 1
1983 0
1984 1
1985 0
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 2
1990 1
1991 1
1992 4
1993 5
1994 3
1995 1
1996 5
1997 2
1998 4
1999 2
2000 1
2001 0
2002 5
2003 2
2004 3
2005 0
2006 3
2007 1
2008 2
2009 3
2010 3
2011 0
2012 0
2013 1
2014 1
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 2
2020 2
2021 2
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
Total 113
Download as CSV

Todd Dupont publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd Dupont sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 537+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 112. Most scientists, 112, have 142–146 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 97–101 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientist 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientist 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientist 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42–46 publications 537+

This scientist: 98 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 3
47–51 5
52–56 7
57–61 20
62–66 14
67–71 25
72–76 19
77–81 35
82–86 50
87–91 60
92–96 86
97–101 84 98
102–106 83
107–111 90
112–116 99
117–121 90
122–126 91
127–131 109
132–136 110
137–141 98
142–146 112
147–151 102
152–156 88
157–161 106
162–166 83
167–171 102
172–176 77
177–181 81
182–186 78
187–191 71
192–196 92
197–201 64
202–206 69
207–211 64
212–216 62
217–221 58
222–226 53
227–231 50
232–236 46
237–241 46
242–246 46
247–251 43
252–256 29
257–261 45
262–266 30
267–271 33
272–276 34
277–281 30
282–286 31
287–291 21
292–296 34
297–301 26
302–306 10
307–311 17
312–316 23
317–321 13
322–326 16
327–331 26
332–336 13
337–341 13
342–346 16
347–351 17
352–356 12
357–361 18
362–366 18
367–371 9
372–376 11
377–381 8
382–386 8
387–391 9
392–396 9
397–401 8
402–406 11
407–411 6
412–416 6
417–421 9
422–426 8
427–431 5
432–436 8
437–441 8
442–446 4
447–451 4
452–456 4
457–461 2
462–466 2
467–471 4
472–476 3
477–481 3
482–486 6
487–491 3
492–496 5
497–501 5
502–506 1
507–511 6
512–516 4
517–521 1
522–526 3
527–531 1
532–536 4
537+ 100
Download as CSV

Todd Dupont D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd Dupont sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 57 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 86+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 174. Most scientists, 174, have 30 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 174
31 151
32 174
33 117
34 136
35 127
36 145
37 153
38 150
39 150
40 138
41 136
42 93
43 108
44 115
45 112
46 103
47 75
48 59 48
49 67
50 60
51 57
52 59
53 62
54 60
55 50
56 42
57 54
58 50
59 42
60 41
61 35
62 40
63 21
64 31
65 27
66 29
67 19
68 25
69 17
70 18
71 12
72 14
73 13
74 18
75 9
76 11
77 10
78 9
79 16
80 12
81 10
82 5
83 5
84 13
85 6
86+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Todd Dupont is affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Engineering and Physics and Astronomy, with a focused interest in Computational Mechanics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, and Mechanics of Materials.

Their recent scholarly contributions emphasize advanced computational techniques and numerical methods within engineering disciplines. Notable recent papers include:

  • "Obtaining higher-order Galerkin accuracy when the boundary is polygonally approximated" (2024), published in the Journal of Numerical Mathematics

Todd Dupont's frequent coauthors reflect collaborations in related mathematical and computational fields. These coauthors are:

  • Johnny Guzmán
  • L. Ridgway Scott

Their publication record is concentrated in venues that focus on numerical mathematics and computational methods. The primary publication venue listed is:

  • Journal of Numerical Mathematics

The main research topics covered by their work include:

  • Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
  • Model Reduction and Neural Networks
  • Numerical methods in engineering

Todd Dupont's research explores numerical analysis techniques aimed at improving accuracy and efficiency in computational models. Their contributions to model reduction and neural networks indicate an engagement with contemporary approaches in computational mechanics and applied mathematics.

Best Publications

  • Capillary flow as the cause of ring stains from dried liquid drops

    Robert D. Deegan;Olgica Bakajin;Todd F. Dupont;Greb Huber

  • Contact line deposits in an evaporating drop

    Robert D. Deegan;Olgica Bakajin;Todd F. Dupont;Greg Huber

  • Interior Penalty Procedures for Elliptic and Parabolic Galerkin Methods

    Jim Douglas;Todd Dupont

  • Drop Formation in a One-Dimensional Approximation of the Navier-Stokes Equation

    Jens Eggers;Todd F. Dupont

  • An optimal order process for solving finite element equations

    Randolph E. Bank;Todd Dupont

  • Polynomial approximation of functions in Sobolev spaces

    Todd Dupont;Ridgway Scott

  • Galerkin Methods for Parabolic Equations

    Jim Douglas;Todd Dupont

  • The hierarchical basis multigrid method

    Randolph E. Bank;Todd F. Dupont;Harry Yserentant

  • An Approximate Factorization Procedure for Solving Self-Adjoint Elliptic Difference Equations

    Todd Dupont;Richard P. Kendall;H. H. Rachford

  • $L^2 $-Estimates for Galerkin Methods for Second Order Hyperbolic Equations

    Todd Dupont

  • A Finite Difference Domain Decomposition Algorithm for Numerical Solution of the Heat Equation

    Clint Dawson;Qiang Du;Todd Dupont

  • Sonoluminescing Air Bubbles Rectify Argon

    Detlef Lohse;Michael P. Brenner;Todd F. Dupont;Sascha Hilgenfeldt

  • Bubble shape oscillations and the onset of sonoluminescence

    Michael P. Brenner;Detlef Lohse;T. F. Dupont

  • On Validating an Astrophysical Simulation Code

    A. C. Calder;B. Fryxell;T. Plewa;T. Plewa;R. Rosner

  • ALTERNATING-DIRECTION GALERKIN METHODS ON RECTANGLES

    Jim Douglas;Todd Dupont

  • Collocation Methods for Parabolic Equations in a Single Space Variable

    Jim Douglas;Todd Dupont

  • Droplet breakup in a model of the Hele-Shaw cell.

    Peter Constantin;Todd F. Dupont;Raymond E. Goldstein;Leo P. Kadanoff

  • Optimal _{∞} error estimates for Galerkin approximations to solutions of two-point boundary value problems

    Jim Douglas;Todd Dupont;Lars Wahlbin

  • Singularities and similarities in interface flows

    Andrea L. Bertozzi;Michael P. Brenner;Todd F. Dupont;Leo P. Kadanoff

  • The stability inLq of theL2-projection into finite element function spaces

    Jim Douglas;Todd Dupont;Lars Wahlbin

Frequent Co-Authors

Mary F. Wheeler
Mary F. Wheeler The University of Texas at Austin
Michael P. Brenner
Michael P. Brenner University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Detlef Lohse
Detlef Lohse University of Twente
Thomas Nagylaki
Thomas Nagylaki University of Chicago
Sascha Hilgenfeldt
Sascha Hilgenfeldt University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Randolph E. Bank
Randolph E. Bank University of California, San Diego
Sidney R. Nagel
Sidney R. Nagel University of Chicago
James Serrin
James Serrin University of Minnesota
Peter Constantin
Peter Constantin Princeton University
Bruce Remington
Bruce Remington Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Mathematics in the USA opens doors to various related fields and career pathways, especially in data science, analytics, and business management. Many students find it beneficial to complement their math skills with programs like an MBA, which offer strong business acumen and leadership opportunities.

For those considering flexible options, the cheapest 1 year online MBA programs provide a cost-effective, accelerated route to gain advanced business knowledge without sacrificing time or money. This is ideal for math graduates looking to enter the corporate world quickly.

Transferability is another vital factor. If you started your MBA elsewhere or wish to switch programs, focusing on those with mba transfer credits policies can save time and reduce redundancy in your studies.

For those more inclined toward analytics, a masters in data analytics can be a natural extension of a mathematics background. This field combines computational skills and statistical knowledge to address real-world problems across industries.

Finally, students seeking an accessible entry point into graduate business education may explore mba programs easy to get into, which offer a more flexible admissions process without compromising educational quality.

Best Scientists Citing Todd Dupont

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles