World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
57
Citations
13128
World Ranking
687
National Ranking
348

James H. Bramble publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James H. Bramble sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 148 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

James H. Bramble D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James H. Bramble sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

James H. Bramble was affiliated with Texas A&M University in the United States. Their research contributions spanned the field of engineering with a focus on mechanics of materials and biomedical engineering as notable subfields.

The main topics covered in their work involved laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma, metal and thin film mechanics, as well as advanced surface polishing techniques.

Among the recent publications attributed to James H. Bramble were:

  • Ejection of molten tin in the presence of a hydrogen plasma, published in 2024 in Fusion Engineering and Design
  • Understanding the Learning Experience and Environment of Distance-Based Students through the Use of Photovoice, published in 2025 in American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

The frequent coauthors who contributed alongside James H. Bramble included:

  • Cody Moynihan
  • Steven Stemmley
  • Jackson Stermer
  • Jaime Robertson
  • Natalie Weissburg

The venues where their work was often published were:

  • Fusion Engineering and Design
  • American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

James H. Bramble's work contributed to diverse thematic areas within engineering, especially where methods involving plasma and surface technologies intersected with material mechanics. The research impacted understanding in the behavior of molten metals under plasma conditions as well as educational environments for distance-based learners.

Best Publications

  • Parallel multilevel preconditioners

    James H. Bramble;Joseph E. Pasciak;Jinchao Xu

  • The construction of preconditioners for elliptic problems by substructuring. I

    J H Bramble;J E Pasciak;A H Schatz

  • A preconditioning technique for indefinite systems resulting from mixed approximations of elliptic problems

    James H. Bramble;Joseph E. Pasciak

  • Estimation of Linear Functionals on Sobolev Spaces with Application to Fourier Transforms and Spline Interpolation

    J. H. Bramble;S. R. Hilbert

  • Analysis of the Inexact Uzawa Algorithm for Saddle Point Problems

    James H. Bramble;Joseph E. Pasciak;Apostol T. Vassilev

  • A finite element method for interface problems in domains with smooth boundaries and interfaces

    James H. Bramble;J. Thomas King

  • Convergence estimates for multigrid algorithms without regularity assumptions

    James H. Bramble;Joseph E. Pasciak;Jun Ping Wang;Jinchao Xu

  • Convergence estimates for product iterative methods with applications to domain decomposition

    James H. Bramble;Joseph E. Pasciak;Jun Ping Wang;Jinchao Xu

  • Bounds for a class of linear functionals with applications to Hermite interpolation

    J. H. Bramble;S. R. Hilbert

  • Higher order local accuracy by averaging in the finite element method

    J. H. Bramble;A. H. Schatz

  • The analysis of multigrid algorithms with nonnested spaces or noninherited quadratic forms

    James H. Bramble;Joseph E. Pasciak;Jinchao Xu

  • Some Estimates for a Weighted L 2 Projection

    James H. Bramble;Jinchao Xu

  • Triangular elements in the finite element method

    James H. Bramble;Miloš Zlámal

  • An iterative method for elliptic problems on regions partitioned into substructures

    J H Bramble;J E Pasciak;A H Schatz

  • A least-squares approach based on a discrete minus one inner product for first order systems

    James H. Bramble;Raytcho D. Lazarov;Joseph E. Pasciak

  • New convergence estimates for multigrid algorithms

    James H. Bramble;Joseph E. Pasciak

  • On the stability of the L 2 projection in H 1 (Ω)

    James H. Bramble;Joseph E. Pasciak;Olaf Steinbach

  • The analysis of multigrid methods

    James H. Bramble;Xuejun Zhang

  • A preconditioning technique for the efficient solution of problems with local grid refinement

    James H. Bramble;Richard E. Ewing;Joseph E. Pasciak;Alfred H. Schatz

  • Some Convergence Estimates for Semidiscrete Galerkin Type Approximations for Parabolic Equations

    J. H. Bramble;A. H. Schatz;V. Thomée;L. B. Wahlbin

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph E. Pasciak
Joseph E. Pasciak Texas A&M University
Jinchao Xu
Jinchao Xu Pennsylvania State University
Vidar Thomée
Vidar Thomée Chalmers University of Technology
A. H. Schatz
A. H. Schatz Cornell University
Richard E. Ewing
Richard E. Ewing Texas A&M University
Raytcho Lazarov
Raytcho Lazarov Texas A&M University
Panayot S. Vassilevski
Panayot S. Vassilevski Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Mrinal K. Sen
Mrinal K. Sen The University of Texas at Austin
Walter Gautschi
Walter Gautschi Purdue University West Lafayette
Paul L. Stoffa
Paul L. Stoffa The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mathematics in the USA opens diverse career opportunities, but many students also explore related online degrees to enhance their skills and employability. For instance, a masters in finance online programs offer a strong analytical foundation, leveraging mathematical expertise to excel in financial sectors.

For those interested in business leadership alongside quantitative skills, pursuing the shortest online mba allows professionals to expedite their education while gaining strategic business insights.

Marketing careers also benefit from quantitative analysis and data-driven decision-making. Enrolling in an online marketing degree can equip graduates with digital marketing techniques and metrics to enhance business growth.

Additionally, many seek intensive business training through year long mba programs, which combine leadership development with analytical problem-solving skills derived from a math background.

Overall, combining mathematics with complementary online degrees broadens career pathways, accelerates professional growth, and opens doors to sectors like finance, marketing, and management.

Best Scientists Citing James H. Bramble