World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
31
Citations
5853
World Ranking
3288
National Ranking
1298

A. H. Schatz publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where A. H. Schatz sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 42 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

A. H. Schatz D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where A. H. Schatz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

A. H. Schatz is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their research and academic work are rooted in this institution, providing a base for their scientific contributions.

No recent papers, frequent co-authors, or regular publication venues are recorded for A. H. Schatz, indicating either a focus outside of prolific journal publishing or data not currently available.

There is no available information about book publications attributed to A. H. Schatz. Likewise, no specific main fields of study, subfields of study, or detailed topics of work are documented for this scientist.

There are no listed awards connected to A. H. Schatz in the available data, and this scientist is currently living.

Best Publications

  • The construction of preconditioners for elliptic problems by substructuring. I

    J H Bramble;J E Pasciak;A H Schatz

  • An observation concerning Ritz-Galerkin methods with indefinite bilinear forms

    Alfred H. Schatz

  • Interior estimates for Ritz-Galerkin methods

    Joachim A. Nitsche;Alfred H. Schatz

  • Higher order local accuracy by averaging in the finite element method

    J. H. Bramble;A. H. Schatz

  • Interior maximum-norm estimates for finite element methods, part II

    A. H. Schatz;L. B. Wahlbin

  • An iterative method for elliptic problems on regions partitioned into substructures

    J H Bramble;J E Pasciak;A H Schatz

  • Crosswind Smear and Pointwise Errors in Streamline Diffusion Finite Element Methods

    C. Johnson;A. H. Schatz;L. B. Wahlbin

  • Maximum norm estimates in the finite element method on plane polygonal domains. I

    A. H. Schatz;L. B. Wahlbin

  • Superconvergence in finite element methods and meshes that are locally symmetric with respect to a point

    A. H. Schatz;I. H. Sloan;L. B. Wahlbin

  • A preconditioning technique for the efficient solution of problems with local grid refinement

    James H. Bramble;Richard E. Ewing;Joseph E. Pasciak;Alfred H. Schatz

  • On the quasi-optimality in _{∞} of the ¹-projection into finite element spaces

    A. H. Schatz;L. B. Wahlbin

  • Some Convergence Estimates for Semidiscrete Galerkin Type Approximations for Parabolic Equations

    J. H. Bramble;A. H. Schatz;V. Thomée;L. B. Wahlbin

  • Rayleigh‐Ritz‐Galerkin methods for dirichlet's problem using subspaces without boundary conditions

    James H. Bramble;Alfred H. Schatz

  • On the finite element method for singularly perturbed reaction-diffusion problems in two and one dimensions

    A. H. Schatz;L. B. Wahlbin

  • Pointwise error estimates and asymptotic error expansion inequalities for the finite element method on irregular grids: part I. global estimates

    Alfred H. Schatz

  • Maximum norm stability and error estimates in parabolic finite element equations

    A. H. Schatz;V. Thomée;L. B. Wahlbin

  • Maximum norm estimates in the finite element method on plane polygonal domains. II. Refinements

    A. H. Schatz;L. B. Wahlbin

  • A weak discrete maximum principle and stability of the finite element method in _{∞} on plane polygonal domains. I

    Alfred H. Schatz

  • Some new error estimates for Ritz-Galerkin methods with minimal regularity assumptions

    Alfred H. Schatz;Junping Wang

  • Asymptotically exact a posteriori estimators for the pointwise gradient error on each element in irregular meshes. Part 1: a smooth problem and globally quasi-uniform meshes

    W. Hoffmann;A. H. Schatz;B. Wahlbin;G. Wittum

Frequent Co-Authors

James H. Bramble
James H. Bramble Texas A&M University
Vidar Thomée
Vidar Thomée Chalmers University of Technology
Joseph E. Pasciak
Joseph E. Pasciak Texas A&M University
Johnny Guzmán
Johnny Guzmán Brown University
Wolfgang L. Wendland
Wolfgang L. Wendland University of Stuttgart
Richard E. Ewing
Richard E. Ewing Texas A&M University
Claes Johnson
Claes Johnson Royal Institute of Technology
Ian H. Sloan
Ian H. Sloan University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students exploring Mathematics in the USA, complementing your studies with business-focused degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many professionals leverage analytical skills gained in math programs to excel in managerial roles or strategic positions.

If you're considering advancing quickly, some of the fastest MBA programs online provide accelerated options to earn your degree without compromising quality. These can be ideal for those eager to enter the workforce or pivot careers swiftly.

Marketing is another promising field where quantitative expertise is highly valued. Pursuing a master's degree in marketing online combines creativity with data-driven decision-making, expanding your job opportunities.

For those seeking focused, time-efficient options, exploring the year long MBA programs can make advanced education manageable alongside professional commitments. Additionally, many top schools offer an online MBA with transfer credits accepted, helping reduce costs and duration by recognizing prior coursework.

Best Scientists Citing A. H. Schatz

Recently Published Articles