World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
52
Citations
11269
World Ranking
956
National Ranking
446

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
56
Citations
11978
World Ranking
2815
National Ranking
858

Jan Mandel publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Mandel sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 157 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Jan Mandel D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Mandel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jan Mandel is affiliated with the University of Colorado Denver in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a strong focus on subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Environmental Engineering, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, and Mechanics of Materials.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics including fire effects on ecosystems, wind and air flow studies, meteorological phenomena and simulations, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, atmospheric aerosols and clouds, and fire dynamics and safety research.

Frequent coauthors contributing to their research include Adam K. Kochanski, Angel Farguell, Derek V. Mallia, Kyle Hilburn, and James Haley.

Jan Mandel has published in a range of scientific venues, notably arXiv (Cornell University), Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, Atmosphere, and Remote Sensing.

Representative recent papers authored or coauthored by Jan Mandel are:

  • Evaluating Wildfire Smoke Transport Within a Coupled Fire-Atmosphere Model Using a High-Density Observation Network for an Episodic Smoke Event Along Utah's Wasatch Front, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Incorporating a Canopy Parameterization within a Coupled Fire-Atmosphere Model to Improve a Smoke Simulation for a Prescribed Burn, 2020, Atmosphere
  • Machine Learning Estimation of Fire Arrival Time from Level-2 Active Fires Satellite Data, 2021, Remote Sensing
  • Integration of a Coupled Fire-Atmosphere Model Into a Regional Air Quality Forecasting System for Wildfire Events, 2021, Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
  • Generative Algorithms for Fusion of Physics-Based Wildfire Spread Models with Satellite Data for Initializing Wildfire Forecasts, 2024, Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems

Best Publications

  • Algebraic Multigrid by Smoothed Aggregation for Second and Fourth Order Elliptic Problems

    Petr Vanek;Jan Mandel;Marian Brezina

  • Balancing domain decomposition

    Jan Mandel

  • Optimal convergence properties of the FETI domain decomposition method

    Charbel Farhat;Jan Mandel;Francois Xavier Roux

  • Convergence of Algebraic Multigrid Based on Smoothed Aggregation

    Marian Brezina;Jan Mandel;Petr Vanek

  • Coupled atmosphere-wildland fire modeling with WRF 3.3 and SFIRE 2011

    J. Mandel;J. D. Beezley;A. K. Kochanski

  • An algebraic theory for primal and dual substructuring methods by constraints

    Jan Mandel;Clark R. Dohrmann;Radek Tezaur

  • Efficient preconditioning for the p -version finite element method in two dimensions

    I. Babuška;A. Craig;J. Mandel;J. Pitkäranta

  • Convergence of a balancing domain decomposition by constraints and energy minimization

    Jan Mandel;Jan Mandel;Clark R. Dohrmann

  • The finite volume element method for diffusion equations on general triangulations

    Zhiqiang Cai;Jan Mandel;Steve McCormick

  • Balancing domain decomposition for problems with large jumps in coefficients

    Jan Mandel;Marian Brezina

  • The two-level FETI method for static and dynamic plate problems Part I: An optimal iterative solver for biharmonic systems

    Charbel Farhat;Jan Mandel;Jan Mandel

  • Convergence of a Substructuring Method with Lagrange Multipliers

    Jan Mandel;Radek Tezaur

  • A wildland fire model with data assimilation

    Jan Mandel;Lynn S. Bennethum;Jonathan D. Beezley;Janice L. Coen

  • On the Convergence of a Dual-Primal Substructuring Method

    Jan Mandel;Radek Tezaur

  • Balancing domain decomposition for mixed finite elements

    Lawrence C. Cowsar;Jan Mandel;Mary F. Wheeler

  • A scalable Lagrange multiplier based domain decomposition method for time-dependent problems

    Charbel Farhat;Po-Shu Chen;Jan Mandel

  • Energy optimization of algebraic multigrid bases

    J. Mandel;M. Brezina;P. Vaněk

  • Coupled atmosphere-wildland fire modeling with WRF-Fire

    Jan Mandel;Jonathan D. Beezley;Adam K. Kochanski

  • On the convergence of the ensemble Kalman filter

    Jan Mandel;Loren Cobb;Jonathan D. Beezley

  • The two-level FETI method. Part II: Extension to shell problems, parallel implementation and performance results

    Charbel Farhat;Po-Shu Chen;Jan Mandel;Jan Mandel;Francois Xavier Roux

  • Energy Optimization of Algebraic Multigrid Bases

    Marian Brezina;Jan Mandel;Petr Vanek

Frequent Co-Authors

Charbel Farhat
Charbel Farhat Stanford University
Steven K. Krueger
Steven K. Krueger University of Utah
Roger D. Ottmar
Roger D. Ottmar US Forest Service
Wei Zhao
Wei Zhao Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology
Shawn Urbanski
Shawn Urbanski US Forest Service
Chris R. Johnson
Chris R. Johnson University of Utah
Richard E. Ewing
Richard E. Ewing Texas A&M University
Kirk R. Baker
Kirk R. Baker Environmental Protection Agency
Barry Lynn
Barry Lynn Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Nancy H. F. French
Nancy H. F. French Michigan Technological University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mathematics in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career prospects. Many opt for a one-year MBA program to quickly gain business expertise, complementing their analytical skills. This pathway is ideal for those seeking leadership roles in finance, technology, or consulting.

Transferring credits efficiently is another important consideration. Prospective students often look for online MBA programs that accept transfer credits, enabling a smoother transition and saving time and costs. This flexibility supports continuous education alongside professional commitments.

Data analytics is a rapidly growing field closely aligned with mathematics. Pursuing a data analytics masters degree enhances proficiency in interpreting complex datasets and applying statistical techniques, making graduates highly competitive in sectors like healthcare, marketing, and data science.

For those concerned about admissions competitiveness, researching the easiest MBA programs to get into can provide accessible routes to advanced qualifications. These programs maintain quality while offering less rigorous entry standards, broadening opportunities for career advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Mandel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles