World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
49
Citations
11488
World Ranking
1133
National Ranking
88

Andrew J. Wathen publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew J. Wathen sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 140 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Andrew J. Wathen D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew J. Wathen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew J. Wathen is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several interconnected fields including Engineering and Computer Science, with notable subfields being Computational Mechanics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Numerical Analysis, Ocean Engineering, and Atomic and Molecular Physics and Optics.

The scientist's work is concentrated on topics that involve advanced numerical methods in computational mathematics, matrix theory and algorithms, numerical methods for differential equations, enhanced oil recovery techniques, reservoir engineering and simulation methods, as well as electromagnetic scattering and analysis.

Recent publications by Andrew J. Wathen cover a range of subjects within these areas. These papers include:

  • "All-at-once solution of linear wave equations," 2021, published in Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications
  • "Space-Time Block Preconditioning for Incompressible Flow," 2022, appearing in SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
  • "A Constrained Pressure-Temperature Residual (CPTR) Method for Non-Isothermal Multiphase Flow in Porous Media," 2020, published in SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
  • "When Lanczos Iterations Generate Symmetric Quadrature Nodes?," 2024, available on arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Least Squares and the Not-Normal Equations," 2025, published in SIAM Review

Frequent co-authors in their collaborations include Federico Danieli, Ben S. Southworth, Thomas Roy, T.B. Jönsthövel, and Christopher Lemon. These collaborations indicate an interdisciplinary approach bridging numerical methods and applications in various scientific and engineering problems.

Andrew J. Wathen's work has appeared repeatedly in key venues such as SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications, arXiv, and SIAM Review, underscoring a consistent engagement with high-profile research outlets in computational mathematics and scientific computing.

Best Publications

  • Finite Elements and Fast Iterative Solvers: with Applications in Incompressible Fluid Dynamics

    Howard C. Elman;David J. Silvester;Andrew J. Wathen

  • Finite Elements and Fast Iterative Solvers: with Applications in Incompressible Fluid Dynamics

    Unknown

  • A Note on Preconditioning for Indefinite Linear Systems

    Malcolm F. Murphy;Gene H. Golub;Andrew J. Wathen

  • Fast iterative solution of stabilised Stokes systems part II: using general block preconditioners

    David Silvester;Andrew Wathen

  • Constraint Preconditioning for Indefinite Linear Systems

    Carsten Keller;Nicholas I. M. Gould;Andrew J. Wathen

  • A Preconditioner for the Steady-State Navier--Stokes Equations

    David Kay;Daniel Loghin;Andrew Wathen

  • Fast iterative solution of stabilised Stokes systems, part I: using simple diagonal preconditioners

    Andrew J. Wathen;David J. Silvester

  • Realistic Eigenvalue Bounds for the Galerkin Mass Matrix

    A. J. Wathen

  • Efficient preconditioning of the linearized Navier—Stokes equations for incompressible flow

    David Silvester;Howard Elman;David Kay;Andrew Wathen

  • Performance and analysis of saddle point preconditioners for the discrete steady-state Navier-Stokes equations

    Howard C. Elman;David J. Silvester;Andrew J. Wathen

  • Optimal Solvers for PDE-Constrained Optimization

    Tyrone Rees;H. Sue Dollar;Andrew J. Wathen

  • Minimum residual methods for augmented systems

    B. Fischer;A. Ramage;D. J. Silvester;A. J. Wathen

  • A new approximation of the Schur complement in preconditioners for PDE-constrained optimization

    John W. Pearson;Andrew J. Wathen

  • A moving grid finite element method applied to a model biological pattern generator

    Anotida Madzvamuse;Andrew J. Wathen;Philip K. Maini

  • An Iteration for Indefinite Systems and Its Application to the Navier--Stokes Equations

    Gene H. Golub;Andrew J. Wathen

  • Analysis of Preconditioners for Saddle-Point Problems

    D. Loghin;A. J. Wathen

  • REGULARIZATION-ROBUST PRECONDITIONERS FOR TIME-DEPENDENT PDE-CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS ∗

    John W. Pearson;Martin Stoll;Andrew J. Wathen

  • Chebyshev semi-iteration in preconditioning for problems including the mass matrix.

    Andy Wathen;Tyrone Rees

  • Iterative Methods for Problems in Computational Fluid Dynamics

    Howard C. Elman;David J. Silvester;Andrew J. Wathen

  • A Moving Grid Finite Element Method for the Simulation of Pattern Generation by Turing Models on Growing Domains

    Anotida Madzvamuse;Philip K. Maini;Andrew J. Wathen

  • FAST ITERATIVE SOLUTION OF STABILIZED STOKES SYSTEMS PART .2. USING GENERAL BLOCK PRECONDITIONERS

    David Silvester;A Wathen

  • Optimal solvers for PDE-constrained optimization

    T Rees;HS Dollar;AJ Wathen

Frequent Co-Authors

Howard C. Elman
Howard C. Elman University of Maryland, College Park
Philip K. Maini
Philip K. Maini University of Oxford
Nicholas I. M. Gould
Nicholas I. M. Gould Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Garth N. Wells
Garth N. Wells University of Cambridge
Iain S. Duff
Iain S. Duff Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Gene H. Golub
Gene H. Golub Stanford University
David Abramson
David Abramson University of Queensland
Michael C. Ferris
Michael C. Ferris University of Wisconsin–Madison
Dominic P. Kwiatkowski
Dominic P. Kwiatkowski University of Oxford
Ian H. Sloan
Ian H. Sloan University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those studying Mathematics in the USA, expanding your qualifications through related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many students consider pursuing an MBA to enhance their business acumen. If you’ve already completed some coursework, exploring mba transfer credits options can save time and resources while advancing your education.

Data Analytics is another complementary field, closely tied to mathematical skills. Enrolling in top data analytics masters programs can provide you with expertise in handling big data and deriving actionable insights, an increasingly valuable asset in many industries.

If flexibility is a priority, several mba programs easy to get into offer accessible entry points for busy professionals or recent graduates. Many of these programs are designed to accommodate different learning styles and schedules.

For those seeking a quicker route, consider exploring the easiest and fastest online mba programs. These options provide accelerated paths, making it possible to balance education with other commitments while still gaining valuable qualifications.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew J. Wathen

Trending Scientists