What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
His scientific interests lie mostly in Cryptosporidium parvum, Microbiology, Diarrhea, Cryptosporidium and Immunology.
His studies in Cryptosporidium parvum integrate themes in fields like Outbreak, Infectivity, Antibody, Excretion and Cohort.
His Microbiology study is mostly concerned with Cyclospora cayetanensis and Protozoa.
His Diarrhea research incorporates elements of Water supply, Sanitation, Open defecation, Feces and Water quality.
His study looks at the relationship between Cryptosporidium and fields such as Isolation, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems.
Charles R. Sterling has included themes like Prospective cohort study, Cohort study, Genotype and Risk factor in his Immunology study.
His most cited work include:
- The Infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum in Healthy Volunteers (775 citations)
- Effects of ozone, chlorine dioxide, chlorine, and monochloramine on Cryptosporidium parvum oocyst viability. (608 citations)
- Virulence of three distinct Cryptosporidium parvum isolates for healthy adults. (389 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of investigation include Microbiology, Cryptosporidium parvum, Cryptosporidium, Virology and Diarrhea.
His Microbiology study combines topics in areas such as Monoclonal antibody and Polymerase chain reaction.
Charles R. Sterling studied Cryptosporidium parvum and Antibody that intersect with Yolk and Excretion.
His study in Cryptosporidium is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Coccidia, Environmental chemistry, Water pollution, Water treatment and Filtration.
His study explores the link between Virology and topics such as Antigen that cross with problems in Glycoprotein.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Feces, Epidemiology, El Niño, Immunology and Cyclospora.
He most often published in these fields:
- Microbiology (37.17%)
- Cryptosporidium parvum (32.74%)
- Cryptosporidium (26.55%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2008-2019)?
- Demography (5.31%)
- Taenia solium (5.31%)
- Pathology (6.19%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Demography, Taenia solium, Pathology, Trypanosoma cruzi and Chagas disease are his primary areas of study.
Charles R. Sterling combines subjects such as Molecular biology, Biotinylation, Neurocysticercosis and Chinese hamster ovary cell with his study of Taenia solium.
His research in Pathology intersects with topics in Immunoglobulin M and Guinea pig, Cavia.
His Chagas disease research incorporates themes from Vector, Serology, Umbilicus and Obstetrics.
His Incidence research includes themes of Immunology, Surveillance data, Credible interval and Age categories.
Charles R. Sterling interconnects El Niño and Diarrhea in the investigation of issues within Surveillance data.
Between 2008 and 2019, his most popular works were:
- Congenital Trypanosoma cruzi Transmission in Santa Cruz, Bolivia (117 citations)
- Molecular Analysis of Household Transmission of Giardia lamblia in a Region of High Endemicity in Peru (57 citations)
- A History of Chagas Disease Transmission, Control, and Re-Emergence in Peri-Rural La Joya, Peru (36 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
His primary areas of study are Vector, Incidence, Demography, Triatoma and Virology.
His study of Vector brings together topics like Transmission, Context, Infestation and Socioeconomics.
The concepts of his Incidence study are interwoven with issues in Surveillance data and El Niño.
Among his Demography studies, there is a synthesis of other scientific areas such as Diarrhea, Age categories, Credible interval, Cross-sectional study and Immunology.
His Credible interval research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Trypanosoma cruzi and Chagas disease.
His Virology research integrates issues from Haplotype, Molecular epidemiology, Genotype and Giardia lamblia.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
