World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
53
Citations
8103
World Ranking
4927
National Ranking
2289

Deepak Kapur publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deepak Kapur sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 256 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Deepak Kapur D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deepak Kapur sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Deepak Kapur is affiliated with the University of New Mexico in the United States and works primarily in the field of Computer Science. Their research spans several subfields, with a strong focus on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, and Computational Mechanics. Additional contributions touch on Computer Networks and Communications as well as Information Systems.

The scientist's recent publications illustrate a breadth of topics within theoretical computer science. Selected papers include:

  • An Algorithm for Computing a Minimal Comprehensive Gröbner Basis of a Parametric Polynomial System, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Modularity and Combination of Associative Commutative Congruence Closure Algorithms enriched with Semantic Properties, 2023, Logical Methods in Computer Science
  • Uniform Interpolants in EUF: Algorithms using DAG-representations, 2022, Logical Methods in Computer Science
  • Interpolation Results for Arrays with Length and MaxDiff, 2023, ACM Transactions on Computational Logic
  • Deciding the Word Problem for Ground and Strongly Shallow Identities with respect to Extensional Symbols, 2022, Journal of Automated Reasoning

Kapur's research addresses diverse topics such as logic, programming, and type systems; formal methods in verification; polynomial and algebraic computation; semigroups and automata theory; advanced numerical analysis techniques; as well as logic, reasoning, and knowledge. These areas represent key thematic strands within their career.

  • Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Polynomial and algebraic computation
  • Semigroups and automata theory
  • Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Numerical Methods and Algorithms

Frequent collaborators with Kapur include Silvio Ghilardi, Alessandro Gianola, Chiara Naso, Franz Baader, and Wayne Witzel. These collaborations indicate an active engagement with peers specializing in related theoretical and computational topics.

  • Silvio Ghilardi
  • Alessandro Gianola
  • Chiara Naso
  • Franz Baader
  • Wayne Witzel

The scientist often publishes in venues focusing on logic and formal methods including arXiv (Cornell University), Logical Methods in Computer Science, ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, Journal of Automated Reasoning, and Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies. These venues reflect the academic communities to which Kapur contributes.

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Logical Methods in Computer Science
  • ACM Transactions on Computational Logic
  • Journal of Automated Reasoning
  • Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies

Overall, Deepak Kapur's scholarly work integrates advanced theoretical and computational approaches within computer science, contributing across several intersecting disciplines and collaborating with a range of experts in the field.

Best Publications

  • Solving Polynomial Systems Using a Branch and Prune Approach

    Pascal Van Hentenryck;David McAllester;Deepak Kapur

  • An overview of Rewrite Rule Laboratory (RRL)

    D. Kapur;H. Zhang

  • An equational approach to theorem proving in first-order predicate calculus

    Deepak Kapur;Paliath Narendran

  • Algebraic and geometric reasoning using Dixon resultants

    Deepak Kapur;Tushar Saxena;Lu Yang

  • Complexity of matching problems

    Dan Benanav;Deepak Kapur;Paliath Narendran

  • Proof by consistency

    Deepak Kapur;David R. Musser

  • Using Gröbner bases to reason about geometry problems

    Deepak Kapur

  • NP-completeness of the set unification and matching problems

    Deepak Kapur;Paliath Narendran

  • Geometric reasoning

    Deepak Kapur;Joseph L. Mundy

  • Generating all polynomial invariants in simple loops

    E. Rodríguez-Carbonell;D. Kapur

  • A Mechanizable Induction Principle for Equational Specifications

    Hantao Zhang;Deepak Kapur;Deepak Kapur;Mukkai S. Krishnamoorthy

  • On sufficient-completeness and related properties of term rewriting systems

    Deepak Kapur;Paliath Narendran;Hantao Zhang

  • Geometry theorem proving using Hilbert's Nullstellensatz

    Deepak Kapur

  • Automatically Generating Loop Invariants Using Quantifier Elimination

    Deepak Kapur

  • Automatic Generation of Polynomial Loop Invariants: Algebraic Foundations

    Enric Rodríguez-Carbonell;Deepak Kapur

  • Automatic generation of polynomial invariants of bounded degree using abstract interpretation

    E. Rodríguez-Carbonell;D. Kapur

  • Complexity of unification problems with associative-commutative operators

    Deepak Kapur;Paliath Narendran

  • Interpolation for data structures

    Deepak Kapur;Rupak Majumdar;Calogero G. Zarba

  • A finite thue system with decidable word problem and without equivalent finite canonical system

    Deepak Kapur;Paliath Narendran

  • Shostak's Congruence Closure as Completion

    Deepak Kapur

  • A refutational approach to geometry theorem proving

    Deepak Kapur

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph L. Mundy
Joseph L. Mundy Brown University
Manuel V. Hermenegildo
Manuel V. Hermenegildo Madrid Institute for Advanced Studies
Westley Weimer
Westley Weimer University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Stephanie Forrest
Stephanie Forrest Arizona State University
Silvio Ghilardi
Silvio Ghilardi University of Milan
Jürgen Giesl
Jürgen Giesl RWTH Aachen University
José Meseguer
José Meseguer University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Catherine Meadows
Catherine Meadows United States Naval Research Laboratory
Christopher S. Lynch
Christopher S. Lynch University of California, Riverside

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a Computer Science degree in the USA, there are several related online programs and career pathways worth exploring. Many students find that combining computer science skills with expertise in other technical fields opens up additional job opportunities. For example, an environmental engineering bachelor's degree online prepares graduates to address technology-driven sustainability issues—a sector where programming and data skills are in high demand.

Similarly, pursuing an online mechanical engineering degree can lead to roles at the intersection of hardware, robotics, and software development. Those interested in scientific applications may also benefit from online physics degrees, which lay the foundation for careers in research, simulation, and technology-driven analysis.

For students focused on data and AI, enrolling in the cheapest data science degree programs can provide valuable skills in big data, analytics, and machine learning. Each of these pathways is available online, providing flexibility to tailor your education directly to your career goals in today’s technology landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Deepak Kapur

Trending Scientists