World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 72 1659 1609 854 824 496 23474

Pascal Van Hentenryck publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Pascal Van Hentenryck between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Pascal Van Hentenryck published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 16 papers a year. Output peaked at 44 publications in 2024. 73 of the 641 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 44. Peak 44 publications in 2024. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 17 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 16 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 21 publications 2006: 27 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 26 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 27 publications 2015: 28 publications 2016: 29 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 32 publications 2021: 43 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 36 publications 2024: 44 publications 2025: 29 publications
1986 2025

641 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Pascal Van Hentenryck: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 2
1988 8
1989 3
1990 6
1991 8
1992 6
1993 7
1994 17
1995 11
1996 4
1997 16
1998 4
1999 9
2000 3
2001 4
2002 7
2003 7
2004 17
2005 21
2006 27
2007 18
2008 13
2009 26
2010 15
2011 20
2012 13
2013 13
2014 27
2015 28
2016 29
2017 14
2018 13
2019 18
2020 32
2021 43
2022 22
2023 36
2024 44
2025 29
Total 641
Download as CSV

Pascal Van Hentenryck publications per year - data summary

  • Pascal Van Hentenryck, a Computer Science scholar from Georgia Institute of Technology, has 641 publications recorded across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1986 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2024, with 44 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1986, with 1 publication.
  • The rate of publication averages 16.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 16.0 per year counting only the 40 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 174 publications, 27% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1986-1999: 102 publications (7.3 per year); 2000-2013: 204 publications (14.6 per year); 2014-2025: 335 publications (27.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Pascal Van Hentenryck publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pascal Van Hentenryck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 492–501 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 496 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62 496
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Pascal Van Hentenryck publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • Pascal Van Hentenryck, a Computer Science scholar from Georgia Institute of Technology, records 496 publications - the 93rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 93% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Pascal Van Hentenryck, and about 7% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and Pascal Van Hentenryck ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Pascal Van Hentenryck D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pascal Van Hentenryck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189 72
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Pascal Van Hentenryck D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • Pascal Van Hentenryck, a Computer Science scholar from Georgia Institute of Technology, records 72 D-Index - the 89th percentile of the discipline.
  • 89% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Pascal Van Hentenryck, and about 11% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and Pascal Van Hentenryck ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
  • 2009 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) For significant contributions to constraint satisfaction and reasoning under uncertainty, the development of the widely used CHIP, Numerica, OPL, and Comet systems, and his pioneering role in the inception of constraint programming and its integration in operations research.

Overview

Pascal Van Hentenryck is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research spans a broad range of topics primarily within engineering, with significant contributions to electrical and electronic engineering, transportation, artificial intelligence, automotive engineering, and industrial and manufacturing engineering.

The scientist's work focuses on several key topics related to optimization and mobility:

  • Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Optimal Power Flow Distribution
  • Electric Power System Optimization
  • Energy Load and Power Forecasting
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Power System Optimization and Stability

Pascal Van Hentenryck has published extensively in various venues known for research in artificial intelligence, power systems, and transportation studies. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Electric Power Systems Research
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
  • INFORMS journal on computing

Recent papers authored or co-authored by the scientist cover topics from travel behavior analysis to power flow optimization. Some examples of these publications are:

  • Prediction and behavioral analysis of travel mode choice: A comparison of machine learning and logit models, 2020, Travel Behaviour and Society
  • Combining Deep Learning and Optimization for Preventive Security-Constrained DC Optimal Power Flow, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
  • Mobility-on-demand versus fixed-route transit systems: An evaluation of traveler preferences in low-income communities, 2021, Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice
  • Last-Mile Restoration for Multiple Interdependent Infrastructures, 2021, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • High-Fidelity Machine Learning Approximations of Large-Scale Optimal Power Flow, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

The scientist has collaborated with a number of frequent co-authors, indicating ongoing research partnerships with colleagues such as:

  • Mathieu Tanneau
  • Ferdinando Fioretto
  • Wenbo Chen
  • Kevin Dalmeijer
  • Terrence W. K. Mak

Pascal Van Hentenryck's achievements include being named a Fellow of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) in 2016. Earlier, in 2009, they were recognized as a Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) for contributions related to constraint satisfaction, reasoning under uncertainty, and the development of influential constraint programming systems.

Best Publications

  • Constraint satisfaction in logic programming

    Pascal Van Hentenryck

  • The Constraint Logic Programming Language CHIP.

    Mehmet Dincbas;Pascal Van Hentenryck;Helmut Simonis;Abderrahmane Aggoun

  • The OPL optimization programming language

    Pascal Van Hentenryck

  • Rapid assessment of disaster damage using social media activity.

    Yury Kryvasheyeu;Yury Kryvasheyeu;Haohui Chen;Haohui Chen;Nick Obradovich;Nick Obradovich;Esteban Moro

  • A generic arc-consistency algorithm and its specializations

    Pascal Van Hentenryck;Yves Deville;Choh-Man Teng

  • Scenario-Based Planning for Partially Dynamic Vehicle Routing with Stochastic Customers

    Russell W. Bent;Pascal Van Hentenryck

  • Constraint-based local search

    Pascal Van Hentenryck;Laurent Michel

  • A Two-Stage Hybrid Local Search for the Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows

    Russell Bent;Pascal Van Hentenryck

  • Numerica: A Modeling Language for Global Optimization

    Pascal Van Hentenryck

  • Design, implementation, and evaluation of the constraint language cc (FD)

    Pascal Van Hentenryck;Vijay A. Saraswat;Yves Deville

  • A two-stage hybrid algorithm for pickup and delivery vehicle routing problems with time windows

    Russell Bent;Pascal Van Hentenryck

  • Solving Polynomial Systems Using a Branch and Prune Approach

    Pascal Van Hentenryck;David McAllester;Deepak Kapur

  • Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization Problems

    Willem-Jan van Hoeve;John N. Hooker

  • Constraint satisfaction using constraint logic programming

    Pascal van Hentenryck;Helmut Simonis;Mehmet Dincbas

  • The QC relaxation: A theoretical and computational study on optimal power flow

    Carleton Coffrin;Hassan Hijazi;Pascal Van Hentenryck

  • Prediction and behavioral analysis of travel mode choice: A comparison of machine learning and logit models

    Xilei Zhao;Xiang Yan;Alan Yu;Pascal Van Hentenryck

  • A Linear-Programming Approximation of AC Power Flows

    Carleton Coffrin;Pascal Van Hentenryck

  • Solving the car-sequencing problem in constraint logic programming

    Mehmet Dincbas;Helmut Simonis;Pascal Van Hentenryck

  • Solving large combinatorial problems in logic programming

    Mehmet Dincbas;Helmut Simonis;Pascal Van Hentenryck

  • Online Stochastic Combinatorial Optimization

    Pascal Van Hentenryck;Russell Bent

Frequent Co-Authors

Russell Bent
Russell Bent Los Alamos National Laboratory
Manuel Cebrian
Manuel Cebrian Carlos III University of Madrid
Scott Backhaus
Scott Backhaus Los Alamos National Laboratory
Vijay Saraswat
Vijay Saraswat Goldman Sachs Research
Michela Milano
Michela Milano University of Bologna
Antonio Fernández
Antonio Fernández University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Carlos Cotta
Carlos Cotta University of Malaga
Christian Bessiere
Christian Bessiere University of Montpellier
Lexing Xie
Lexing Xie Australian National University
Michael Chertkov
Michael Chertkov University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the world of Computer Science opens doors to numerous degree options and career paths. For students aiming to boost their prospects, selecting one of the best degrees for the future can make a significant impact, aligning your education with high-demand fields and strong job growth.

For those seeking a faster route to career advancement, there are short masters programs available online. These programs allow learners to gain specialized skills in less time, making it easier to juggle work and study.

Doctoral candidates can benefit from a range of affordable doctoral programs, which provide flexible learning at a lower cost. These options are ideal for professionals who want to reach the highest levels in their field without incurring substantial debt.

If your interests include education and leadership, consider online edd programs affordable for advancing in academic or administrative roles. The flexibility and affordability of these pathways can help you reach your goals efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Pascal Van Hentenryck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles