World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
47
Citations
9082
World Ranking
1269
National Ranking
566

Computer Science

D-Index
53
Citations
11128
World Ranking
4831
National Ranking
2250

John N. Hooker publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John N. Hooker sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 179 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

John N. Hooker D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John N. Hooker sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Khachiyan Prize of the INFORMS Optimization Society
  • 2007 - Fellow of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)

Overview

John N. Hooker is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields including Computer Science, Social Sciences, and Decision Sciences, with a specific focus on areas such as Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research, Computer Networks and Communications, Management Science and Operations Research, and Artificial Intelligence.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics including Game Theory and Voting Systems, Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization, Ethics and Social Impacts of AI, Auction Theory and Applications, Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies, Facility Location and Emergency Management, and Optimization and Mathematical Programming.

Recent papers authored by John N. Hooker include the following:

  • A guide to formulating fairness in an optimization model, 2023, Annals of Operations Research
  • Operational Research: methods and applications, 2023, Journal of the Operational Research Society
  • Stochastic Planning and Scheduling with Logic-Based Benders Decomposition, 2022, INFORMS journal on computing
  • Combining leximax fairness and efficiency in a mathematical programming model, 2021, European Journal of Operational Research
  • A Just Approach Balancing Rawlsian Leximax Fairness and Utilitarianism, 2020, Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society

John N. Hooker frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including Özgün Elçi, Peter Zhang, Arvind U. Raghunathan, David Bergman, and Thiago Serra.

The scientist's work appears regularly in prominent publication venues, with multiple contributions to arXiv (Cornell University), INFORMS journal on computing, Journal of Business Ethics Education, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), and Annals of Operations Research.

John N. Hooker has published books through Morgan & Claypool Publishers, including "Logic-Based Benders Decomposition" (2023) and the forthcoming "The Structure of Fair Solutions" (2025).

The scientist has received recognition including the Khachiyan Prize of the INFORMS Optimization Society in 2018 and was named Fellow of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) in 2007.

Best Publications

  • In This Volume

    John Hooker

  • Logic-Based Benders Decomposition

    John N. Hooker;G. Ottosson

  • Testing Heuristics: We Have It All Wrong

    John N. Hooker

  • Scope for industrial applications of production scheduling models and solution methods

    Iiro Harjunkoski;Christos T. Maravelias;Peter Bongers;Pedro M. Castro

  • Logic-Based Methods for Optimization: Combining Optimization and Constraint Satisfaction

    John Hooker

  • Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization Problems

    Willem-Jan van Hoeve;John N. Hooker

  • Planning and Scheduling by Logic-Based Benders Decomposition

    J. N. Hooker

  • Integrated Methods for Optimization

    John N. Hooker

  • Needed: An Empirical Science of Algorithms

    John N. Hooker

  • A quantitative approach to logical inference

    J. N. Hooker

  • Branching Rules for Satisfiability

    John N. Hooker;V. Vinay

  • Mixed logical-linear programming

    J. N. Hooker;M. A. Osorio

  • Logic, Optimization, and Constraint Programming

    John N. Hooker

  • Logic-Based Methods for Optimization

    John N. Hooker

  • Optimization Methods for Logical Inference

    Vijay Chandru;John Hooker

  • Resolution vs. cutting plane solution of inference problems: Some computational experience

    J. N. Hooker

  • A constraint store based on multivalued decision diagrams

    H. R. Andersen;T. Hadzic;J. N. Hooker;P. Tiedemann

  • A hybrid method for planning and scheduling

    John N. Hooker

  • Solving the incremental satisfiability problem

    J. N. Hooker

  • Extended Horn sets in propositional logic

    V. Chandru;J. N. Hooker

  • Logic-Based Methods for Optimization: A Tutorial

    J.N. Hooker

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Donaldson
Thomas Donaldson University of Pennsylvania
Ignacio E. Grossmann
Ignacio E. Grossmann Carnegie Mellon University
Iiro Harjunkoski
Iiro Harjunkoski Aalto University
Peter L. Hammer
Peter L. Hammer Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Jonathan Cagan
Jonathan Cagan Carnegie Mellon University
Christos T. Maravelias
Christos T. Maravelias Princeton University
Alan Scheller-Wolf
Alan Scheller-Wolf Carnegie Mellon University
Yves Crama
Yves Crama University of Liège
Pedro M. Castro
Pedro M. Castro University of Lisbon
David L. Greene
David L. Greene University of Tennessee at Knoxville

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students exploring Mathematics in the USA, expanding into interdisciplinary fields can enhance career prospects. Many graduates consider combining their strong analytical skills with business acumen by pursuing a masters in marketing. This path merges quantitative reasoning with market strategy to open up roles in marketing analytics and consumer insights.

Alternatively, accelerating leadership skills through year long MBA programs can be a strategic move. These intensive programs equip students with essential management expertise in a condensed timeframe, ideal for those seeking rapid career advancement.

Flexibility is also key; many universities offer online MBA programs that accept transfer credits. This option allows students to leverage previous coursework, reducing both the time and cost needed to complete their degree.

For a focus closer to mathematics, data analytics masters programs are increasingly popular. These programs emphasize data-driven decision-making and offer strong job market potential in sectors ranging from finance to healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing John N. Hooker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles