World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
J. Christopher Beck

J. Christopher Beck

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
5075
World Ranking
10366
National Ranking
414

J. Christopher Beck publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Christopher Beck sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 196 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

J. Christopher Beck D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Christopher Beck sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

J. Christopher Beck is a researcher affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada, focusing primarily on the fields of Computer Science and Engineering. Their work encompasses a broad range of topics within these disciplines, with a substantial number of publications contributing to both theoretical and applied aspects of artificial intelligence and optimization.

Their research spans several main topics, including:

  • AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
  • Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
  • Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
  • Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research

Beck's subfields of study include Artificial Intelligence, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. These areas reflect a multidisciplinary approach that supports both algorithmic development and practical implementation.

They have published extensively in a variety of venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • INFORMS Journal on Computing
  • Proceedings of the International Symposium on Combinatorial Search
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Recent papers by J. Christopher Beck include:

  • "A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Approach to Solving Scheduling Problems" (2021, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Combinatorial Search)
  • "Target Search on Road Networks With Range-Constrained UAVs and Ground-Based Mobile Recharging Vehicles" (2020, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters)
  • "Decision Diagrams for Discrete Optimization: A Survey of Recent Advances" (2022, INFORMS Journal on Computing)
  • "Solving Job-Shop Scheduling Problems with QUBO-Based Specialized Hardware" (2022, Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling)
  • "LM-cut and Operator Counting Heuristics for Optimal Numeric Planning with Simple Conditions" (2021, Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling)

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Ryo Kuroiwa, Margarita P. Castro, Chiara Piacentini, André A. Ciré, and Alexander Shleyfman. These collaborations indicate active engagement in research communities focused on automated planning, optimization, and scheduling.

Best Publications

  • Mixed Integer Programming models for job shop scheduling

    Wen-Yang Ku;J. Christopher Beck

  • Slack-Based Techniques for Robust Schedules

    Andrew J. Davenport;Christophe Gefflot;J. Christopher Beck

  • Problem difficulty for tabu search in job-shop scheduling

    Jean-Paul Watson;J. Christopher Beck;Adele E. Howe;L. Darrell Whitley

  • Improved non-deterministic planning by exploiting state relevance

    Christian Muise;Sheila A. McIlraith;J. Christopher Beck

  • Dsharp: fast d-DNNF compilation with sharpSAT

    Christian Muise;Sheila A. McIlraith;J. Christopher Beck;Eric I. Hsu

  • Wind farm layout optimization on complex terrains – Integrating a CFD wake model with mixed-integer programming

    Jim Y.J. Kuo;David A. Romero;J. Christopher Beck;Cristina H. Amon

  • Decomposition Methods for the Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem with Setups

    Tony T. Tran;Arthur Araujo;J. Christopher Beck

  • A theoretic and practical framework for scheduling in a stochastic environment

    Julien Bidot;Thierry Vidal;Philippe Laborie;J. Christopher Beck

  • Proactive algorithms for job shop scheduling with probabilistic durations

    J. Christopher Beck;Nic Wilson

  • Combining Constraint Programming and Local Search for Job-Shop Scheduling

    J. Christopher Beck;T. K. Feng;Jean-Paul Watson

  • Vehicle routing and job shop scheduling: what's the difference?

    J. Christopher Beck;Patrick Prosser;Evgeny Selensky

  • Constraint-directed techniques for scheduling alternative activities

    J. Christopher Beck;Mark S. Fox

  • Texture-based heuristics for scheduling revisited

    J. Christopher Beck;Andrew J. Davenport;Edward M. Sitarski;Mark S. Fox

  • APPLYING MACHINE LEARNING TO LOW‐KNOWLEDGE CONTROL OF OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS

    Tom Carchrae;J. Christopher Beck

  • A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Approach to Solving Scheduling Problems

    Tony T. Tran;Minh Do;Eleanor Gilbert Rieffel;Jeremy Frank

  • Scheduling with uncertain durations: Modeling β-robust scheduling with constraints

    Christine Wei Wu;Kenneth N. Brown;J. Christopher Beck

  • A Hybrid Approach to Scheduling with Earliness and Tardiness Costs

    J. Christopher Beck;Philippe Refalo

  • Solution-guided multi-point constructive search for job shop scheduling

    J. Christopher Beck

  • Planning modulo theories: extending the planning paradigm

    Peter Gregory;Derek Long;Maria Fox;J. Christopher Beck

  • Dynamic optimization of chemotherapy outpatient scheduling with uncertainty

    Shoshana Hahn-Goldberg;Michael W. Carter;J. Christopher Beck;Maureen Trudeau

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark S. Fox
Mark S. Fox University of Toronto
Sheila A. McIlraith
Sheila A. McIlraith University of Toronto
Cristina H. Amon
Cristina H. Amon University of Toronto
Eugene C. Freuder
Eugene C. Freuder University College Cork
Jean-Paul Watson
Jean-Paul Watson Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Eleanor Rieffel
Eleanor Rieffel Ames Research Center
Michael Gruninger
Michael Gruninger University of Toronto
Mark Chignell
Mark Chignell University of Toronto
Scott Sanner
Scott Sanner University of Toronto
Gary F. Marcus
Gary F. Marcus New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Planning to study Computer Science in the USA? Exploring alternative degree options and flexible programs can open new career pathways. Many students begin their journey with an online associate degree. These programs are affordable, take less time to complete, and provide foundational skills that transfer easily to bachelor's programs or entry-level IT roles.

For those aiming for advanced positions, it’s helpful to know which master's degree is most in demand in usa. Degrees like Computer Science and Data Science are highly valued by employers, and online master's programs make it easier for working professionals to upskill.

Cost is often a major concern. Thankfully, there are plenty of affordable online courses that allow you to learn without breaking the bank. Some institutions also make it possible for those with less-than-perfect grades to pursue higher education through a college that accepts low gpa.

With these options, students of all backgrounds and abilities can find flexible and accessible routes to a rewarding career in Computer Science.

Best Scientists Citing J. Christopher Beck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles