World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
40
Citations
6547
World Ranking
6094
National Ranking
2073

Jay R. Rooker publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay R. Rooker sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 168 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Jay R. Rooker D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay R. Rooker sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jay R. Rooker is affiliated with Texas A&M University at Galveston in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science with particular attention to marine and fisheries research.

Their body of work spans several subfields including global and planetary change, ecology, nature and landscape conservation, oceanography, and ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics.

Key topics covered in their publications consist of marine and fisheries research, isotope analysis in ecology, marine bivalve and aquaculture studies, coral and marine ecosystems studies, fish ecology and management studies, marine animal studies overview, and ichthyology and marine biology.

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Ecology
  • Marine Ecology Progress Series
  • Scientific Reports
  • Bulletin of Marine Science

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by Jay R. Rooker are:

  • Taxonomic Richness and Diversity of Larval Fish Assemblages in the Oceanic Gulf of Mexico: Links to Oceanographic Conditions, 2020, Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Fish assemblages associated with artificial reefs assessed using multiple gear types in the northwest Gulf of Mexico, 2020, Bulletin of Marine Science
  • The Open-Ocean Gulf of Mexico After Deepwater Horizon: Synthesis of a Decade of Research, 2022, Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Unidirectional trans-Atlantic gene flow and a mixed spawning area shape the genetic connectivity of Atlantic bluefin tuna, 2023, Molecular Ecology
  • Thermal sensitivity of field metabolic rate predicts differential futures for bluefin tuna juveniles across the Atlantic Ocean, 2023, Nature Communications

Jay R. Rooker collaborates frequently with several researchers including:

  • R. J. David Wells
  • Michael A. Dance
  • Michelle Zapp Sluis
  • Nathan Miller
  • Heidi Dewar

Best Publications

  • Is otolith strontium a useful scalar of life cycles in estuarine fishes

    David H Secor;Jay R Rooker

  • Natal Homing and Connectivity in Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Populations

    Jay R. Rooker;David H. Secor;Gregorio De Metrio;Ryan Schloesser

  • Life History and Stock Structure of Atlantic Bluefin Tuna (Thunnus thynnus)

    Jaime R. Alvarado Bremer;Barbara A. Block;Heidi Dewar;Gregorio De Metrio

  • Diel, lunar and seasonal changes in a mangrove fish assemblage off Southwestern Puerto Rico

    J. R. Rooker;G. D. Dennis

  • Fish assemblages on artificial and natural reefs in the Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary, USA

    J. R. Rooker;Q. R. Dokken;C. V. Pattengill;G. J. Holt

  • Identification of riverine, estuarine, and coastal contingents of Hudson River striped bass based upon otolith elemental fingerprints

    David H. Secor;Jay R. Rooker;Erik Zlokovitz;Vincent S. Zdanowicz

  • Identification of Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) stocks from putative nurseries using otolith chemistry

    Jay R. Rooker;David H. Secor;Vincent S. Zdanowicz;Gregorio De Metrio

  • Postsettlement patterns of habitat use by sciaenid fishes in subtropical seagrass meadows

    Jay R. Rooker;Scott A. Holt;Manuel A. Soto;G. Joan Holt

  • Discrimination of northern bluefin tuna from nursery areas in the Pacific Ocean using otolith chemistry

    Jay R. Rooker;David H. Secor;Vincent S. Zdanowicz;Tomoyuki Itoh

  • Evidence of trans-Atlantic movement and natal homing of bluefin tuna from stable isotopes in otoliths

    Jay R. Rooker;David H. Secor;Gregorio DeMetrio;Alan J. Kaufman

  • Vulnerability of newly settled red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) to predatory fish: is early-life survival enhanced by seagrass meadows?

    J. R. Rooker;G. J. Holt;S. A. Holt

  • Trophic ecology of Sargassum-associated fishes in the Gulf of Mexico determined from stable isotopes and fatty acids

    Jay R. Rooker;Jason P. Turner;Scott A. Holt

  • Utilization of subtropical seagrass meadows by newly settled red drum Sciaenops ocellatus : patterns of distribution and growth

    Jay R. Rooker;Scott A. Holt

  • Crossing the line: migratory and homing behaviors of Atlantic bluefin tuna

    Jay R Rooker;Haritz Arrizabalaga;Igaratza Fraile;David H. Secor

  • Application of RNA : DNA Ratios to Evaluate the Condition and Growth of Larval and Juvenile Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus).

    JR Rooker;GJ Holt

  • Bioaccumulation of mercury in pelagic fishes from the northern Gulf of Mexico

    Yang J. Cai;Jay R. Rooker;Gary A. Gill;Jason P. Turner

  • Evaluating post-release behaviour modification in large pelagic fish deployed with pop-up satellite archival tags

    John P. Hoolihan;Jiangang Luo;Francisco J. Abascal;Steven E. Campana

  • Spatial, Temporal, and Habitat-Related Variation in Abundance of Pelagic Fishes in the Gulf of Mexico: Potential Implications of the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill

    Jay R. Rooker;Larissa L. Kitchens;Michael A. Dance;R. J. David Wells

  • SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL PATTERNS OF HABITAT USE BY FISHES ASSOCIATED WITH SARGASSUM MATS IN THE NORTHWESTERN GULF OF MEXICO

    R. J. David;Jay R. Rooker

  • Distribution and habitat associations of billfish and swordfish larvae across mesoscale features in the Gulf of Mexico.

    Jay R. Rooker;Jay R. Rooker;Jeff R. Simms;Jeff R. Simms;R. J. David Wells;Scott A. Holt

  • Spatial and temporal variability in growth, mortality, and recruitment potential of postsettlement red drum, Sciaenops ocellatus, in a subtropical estuary

    Jay R. Rooker;Jay R. Rooker;Scott A. Holt;G. Joan Holt;Lee A. Fuiman

  • Chemistry of tuna otoliths: assessment of base composition and postmortem handling effects

    J. R. Rooker;V. S. Zdanowicz;D. H. Secor

Frequent Co-Authors

David H. Secor
David H. Secor University of Maryland Center For Environmental Sciences
Antonietta Quigg
Antonietta Quigg Texas A&M University at Galveston
Miguel N. Santos
Miguel N. Santos Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera
Mahmood S. Shivji
Mahmood S. Shivji Nova Southeastern University
David L. Dettman
David L. Dettman University of Arizona
Molly Lutcavage
Molly Lutcavage University of Massachusetts Boston
Barbara A. Block
Barbara A. Block Stanford University
John E. Graves
John E. Graves Virginia Institute of Marine Science
Gary A. Gill
Gary A. Gill Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Nicholas S. Fisher
Nicholas S. Fisher Stony Brook University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens doors to diverse educational and professional opportunities. Many students consider advancing their skills through flexible online degrees, often in adjacent fields that build on their science foundation.

For those interested in education and information management, colleges with library science programs offer affordable online routes. If you’re drawn to human communication or biology, the allied health sector—specifically speech-language pathology—has grown rapidly. There are asha accredited online slp programs available that blend speed, flexibility, and rigorous standards, while online speech-language pathology prerequisites program options cater to students from unrelated backgrounds seeking a career switch.

The demand for healthcare professionals extends further—science graduates are often eligible for accelerated bsn programs for non nurses, allowing entry into nursing in just 12–18 months. Overall, online pathways ensure that those studying Ecology and Evolution can find related, impactful careers in education, healthcare, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Jay R. Rooker

Trending Scientists