World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
56
Citations
11916
World Ranking
4095
National Ranking
1944

Stephen F. Smith publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen F. Smith sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 279 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Stephen F. Smith D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen F. Smith sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - AAAI Robert S. Engelmore Memorial Lecture Award For sustained research excellence in constraint-based planning and scheduling technologies, deployment of those technologies to a range of significant real-world problems, and extensive service to the AI community that includes significant outreach to related technical fields.
  • 2007 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) For significant contributions to heuristic and mixed-initiative scheduling, constraint-based search, and the development of scalable AI systems.

Overview

Stephen F. Smith is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States and has a research portfolio centered primarily on engineering and computer science fields. Their work spans multiple subfields, including industrial and manufacturing engineering, automotive engineering, computer networks and communications, control and systems engineering, as well as computer vision and pattern recognition.

The scientist's research topics encompass several areas related to transportation and optimization technologies. Key focus areas include:

  • Traffic control and management
  • Transportation planning and optimization
  • Traffic prediction and management techniques
  • Optimization and search problems
  • Vehicle routing optimization methods
  • Robotic path planning algorithms
  • Transportation and mobility innovations

Stephen F. Smith has published in notable venues that include arXiv (Cornell University), IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, SSRN Electronic Journal, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), and AI Magazine. Their frequent co-authors are Hsu-kuang Chiu, Zachary B. Rubinstein, Jayanth Krishna Mogali, Laura Barbulescu, and Joris Kinable.

Among recent publications authored or co-authored by Stephen F. Smith are:

  • "Smart Infrastructure for Future Urban Mobility," 2020, AI Magazine

Other recent papers linked to co-authors, within related domains, include:

  • "Efficient primal heuristic updates for the blocking job shop problem," 2021, European Journal of Operational Research
  • "Snow plow route optimization: A constraint programming approach," 2020, IISE Transactions
  • "Incremental Management of Oversubscribed Vehicle Schedules in Dynamic Dial-A-Ride Problems," 2021, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "Hierarchical Bayesian Framework for Bus Dwell Time Prediction," 2020, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems

Stephen F. Smith has been recognized with several professional awards, including the AAAI Robert S. Engelmore Memorial Lecture Award in 2018 for work in constraint-based planning and scheduling technologies, and election as a Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) in 2007 for contributions to heuristic and mixed-initiative scheduling, constraint-based search, and scalable AI system development.

Best Publications

  • Modeling Supply Chain Dynamics: A Multiagent Approach

    Jayashankar M. Swaminathan;Stephen F. Smith;Norman M. Sadeh

  • ISIS—a knowledge‐based system for factory scheduling

    Mark S. Fox;Stephen F. Smith

  • A learning system based on genetic adaptive algorithms

    Stephen Frederick Smith

  • Flexible learning of problem solving heuristics through adaptive search

    Stephen F. Smith

  • A Constraint-Based Method for Project Scheduling with Time Windows

    Amedeo Cesta;Angelo Oddi;Stephen F. Smith

  • Using genetic algorithms to schedule flow shop releases

    Gary A. Cleveland;Stephen F. Smith

  • CMRadar : A personal assistant agent for calendar management

    Pragnesh Jay Modi;Manuela Veloso;Stephen F. Smith;Jean Oh

  • Construction and maintaining detailed production plans: Investigations into the development of knowledge-based factory scheduling systems

    Stephen F Smith;Mark S Fox;Peng Si Ow

  • Slack-based heuristics for constraint satisfaction scheduling

    Stephen F. Smith;Cheng-Chung Cheng

  • Competition-Based Induction of Decision Models from Examples

    David Perry Greene;Stephen F. Smith

  • Wasp-like Agents for Distributed Factory Coordination

    Vincent A. Cicirello;Stephen F. Smith

  • Reactive Scheduling Systems

    Stephen F. Smith

  • Viewing scheduling as an opportunistic problem-solving process

    P. S. Ow;S. F. Smith

  • Knowledge-based production management approaches, results and prospects

    Stephen F. Smith

  • Schedule-driven intersection control

    Xiao-Feng Xie;Stephen F. Smith;Liang Lu;Gregory J. Barlow

  • An Ontology for Constructing Scheduling Systems

    Stephen F. Smith;Marcel A. Becker

  • Reactive plan revision

    Peng Si Ow;Stephen F. Smith;Alfred Thiriez

  • Generating robust schedules through temporal flexibility

    Nicola Policella;Stephen F. Smith;Amedeo Cesta;Angelo Oddi

  • APPLYING CONSTRAINT SATISFACTION TECHNIQUES TO JOB SHOP SCHEDULING

    Cheng-Chung Cheng;Stephen F. Smith

  • An Integrated Framework for Generating and Revising Factory Schedules

    Stephen F. Smith;Peng Si Ow;Jean-Yves Potvin;Nicola Muscettola

Frequent Co-Authors

Reid Simmons
Reid Simmons Carnegie Mellon University
Mark S. Fox
Mark S. Fox University of Toronto
Alan Scheller-Wolf
Alan Scheller-Wolf Carnegie Mellon University
Norman Sadeh
Norman Sadeh Carnegie Mellon University
Manuela Veloso
Manuela Veloso Carnegie Mellon University
Fred S. Apple
Fred S. Apple University of Minnesota
Jayashankar M. Swaminathan
Jayashankar M. Swaminathan University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Anthony Stentz
Anthony Stentz Carnegie Mellon University
Jean-Yves Potvin
Jean-Yves Potvin University of Montreal
Jaime G. Carbonell
Jaime G. Carbonell Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a range of flexible online education options and rewarding career routes. For those interested in launching their tech career quickly, online associate degree programs can provide the core skills needed for entry-level positions in less than two years.

If you want to specialize further or move into advanced roles, you may wonder, what masters program should I do? Choosing a high-demand discipline like computer science, data analytics, or cybersecurity can boost your career and salary prospects.

For those looking to advance quickly and affordably, consider the quickest cheapest masters degree options online. Many programs offer accelerated paths so you can earn your credentials in as little as 12-18 months.

Certifications are also highly valued in tech. There are certifications that pay well and require less time investment than a degree, making them ideal for career changers or upskillers.

With so many online pathways available, you can tailor your education to meet your career goals and personal schedule.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen F. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles