World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
57
Citations
25723
World Ranking
4258
National Ranking
1922

Kay M. Tye publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kay M. Tye sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 95 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Kay M. Tye D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kay M. Tye sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - National Institutes of Health Director's Pioneer Award
  • 2014 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Kay M. Tye is affiliated with the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in the United States. Their research contributions span multiple areas within neuroscience and psychology, focusing on understanding neural dynamics, memory, neuroendocrine regulation, and related behaviors.

The scientist's notable recent papers include the following:

  • Acute social isolation evokes midbrain craving responses similar to hunger, 2020, Nature Neuroscience
  • Cortical ensembles orchestrate social competition through hypothalamic outputs, 2022, Nature
  • Precision Calcium Imaging of Dense Neural Populations via a Cell-Body-Targeted Calcium Indicator, 2020, Neuron
  • The neural circuitry of social homeostasis: Consequences of acute versus chronic social isolation, 2021, Cell
  • Neurotensin orchestrates valence assignment in the amygdala, 2022, Nature

Their frequent coauthors include Laurel R. Keyes, Gillian A. Matthews, Romy Wichmann, Nancy Padilla-Coreano, and Matilde Borio.

Kay M. Tye publishes predominantly in these venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • eLife
  • Nature
  • Neuron
  • Nature Neuroscience

Main fields of study encompass Neuroscience and Psychology, with contributions distributed across several subfields:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Social Psychology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

The prominent research topics covered by Kay M. Tye include:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol

Among the awards received are the National Institutes of Health Director's Pioneer Award in 2017 and the fellowship from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 2014.

Best Publications

  • From circuits to behaviour in the amygdala

    Patricia H. Janak;Kay M. Tye

  • Natural Neural Projection Dynamics Underlying Social Behavior

    Lisa A. Gunaydin;Logan Grosenick;Joel C. Finkelstein;Isaac V. Kauvar

  • Amygdala circuitry mediating reversible and bidirectional control of anxiety

    Kay M. Tye;Rohit Prakash;Sung-Yon Kim;Lief E. Fenno

  • Input-specific control of reward and aversion in the ventral tegmental area

    Stephan Lammel;Byung Kook Lim;Chen Ran;Kee Wui Huang

  • Dopamine neurons modulate neural encoding and expression of depression-related behaviour

    Kay M. Tye;Julie J. Mirzabekov;Melissa R. Warden;Emily A. Ferenczi

  • Excitatory transmission from the amygdala to nucleus accumbens facilitates reward seeking

    Garret D. Stuber;Garret D. Stuber;Dennis R. Sparta;Dennis R. Sparta;Alice M. Stamatakis;Wieke A. van Leeuwen

  • Optogenetic investigation of neural circuits underlying brain disease in animal models

    Kay M. Tye;Karl Deisseroth

  • Principles for applying optogenetic tools derived from direct comparative analysis of microbial opsins

    Joanna Mattis;Kay M Tye;Emily A Ferenczi;Charu Ramakrishnan

  • Resolving the neural circuits of anxiety

    Gwendolyn G Calhoon;Kay M Tye

  • GABA neurons of the VTA drive conditioned place aversion.

    Kelly R. Tan;Cédric Yvon;Marc Turiault;Julie J. Mirzabekov

  • Recombinase-Driver Rat Lines: Tools, Techniques, and Optogenetic Application to Dopamine-Mediated Reinforcement

    Ilana B. Witten;Elizabeth E. Steinberg;Soo Yeun Lee;Thomas J. Davidson

  • A prefrontal cortex–brainstem neuronal projection that controls response to behavioural challenge

    Melissa R. Warden;Aslihan Selimbeyoglu;Julie J. Mirzabekov;Maisie Lo

  • Diverging neural pathways assemble a behavioural state from separable features in anxiety

    Sung-Yon Kim;Avishek Adhikari;Soo Yeun Lee;James H. Marshel

  • Noninvasive optical inhibition with a red-shifted microbial rhodopsin

    Amy S. Chuong;Mitra L. Miri;Volker Busskamp;Gillian A.C. Matthews

  • BLA to vHPC inputs modulate anxiety-related behaviors.

    Ada C. Felix-Ortiz;Anna Beyeler;Changwoo Seo;Christopher A. Leppla

  • A Circuit Mechanism for Differentiating Positive and Negative Associations

    Praneeth Namburi;Anna Beyeler;Suzuko Yorozu;Gwendolyn G. Calhoon

  • Amygdala Inputs to the Ventral Hippocampus Bidirectionally Modulate Social Behavior

    Ada Celis Felix-Ortiz;Kay Tye

  • High-efficiency channelrhodopsins for fast neuronal stimulation at low light levels

    André Berndt;Philipp Schoenenberger;Joanna Mattis;Kay M. Tye

  • Divergent Routing of Positive and Negative Information from the Amygdala during Memory Retrieval

    Anna Beyeler;Praneeth Namburi;Gordon F. Glober;Clémence Simonnet

  • Decoding Neural Circuits that Control Compulsive Sucrose Seeking

    Edward H. Nieh;Gillian A. Matthews;Stephen A. Allsop;Kara N. Presbrey

Frequent Co-Authors

Karl Deisseroth
Karl Deisseroth Stanford University
Antonello Bonci
Antonello Bonci National Institute on Drug Abuse
Patricia H. Janak
Patricia H. Janak Johns Hopkins University
Garret D. Stuber
Garret D. Stuber University of Washington
Colleen A. McClung
Colleen A. McClung University of Pittsburgh
Robert C. Malenka
Robert C. Malenka Stanford University
Botond Roska
Botond Roska University of Basel
Ilana B. Witten
Ilana B. Witten Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Kay M. Tye

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles