World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
70
Citations
24709
World Ranking
2465
National Ranking
1165

Garret D. Stuber publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Garret D. Stuber sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 135 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Garret D. Stuber D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Garret D. Stuber sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Garret D. Stuber is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Neuroscience, with particular emphasis on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Molecular Biology. Additional areas of study include Endocrine and Autonomic Systems as well as Social Psychology.

The scientist's work spans a variety of topics within neuroscience, including:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Garret D. Stuber has contributed to several publications, with recent notable papers as follows:

  • A Distributed Neural Code in the Dentate Gyrus and in CA1, 2020, Neuron
  • Transcriptional and Spatial Resolution of Cell Types in the Mammalian Habenula, 2020, Neuron
  • Social Stimuli Induce Activation of Oxytocin Neurons Within the Paraventricular Nucleus of the Hypothalamus to Promote Social Behavior in Male Mice, 2020, Journal of Neuroscience
  • Molecular and anatomical characterization of parabrachial neurons and their axonal projections, 2022, eLife
  • An endogenous opioid circuit determines state-dependent reward consumption, 2021, Nature

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Stuber include:

  • Michael R. Bruchas
  • Vijay Mohan K Namboodiri
  • Koichi Hashikawa
  • Marcus L. Basiri
  • Rhiana C. Simon

The scientist's research outputs are commonly published in the following venues:

  • UNC Libraries
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neuron
  • eLife
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Best Publications

  • Phasic Firing in Dopaminergic Neurons Is Sufficient for Behavioral Conditioning

    Hsing-Chen Tsai;Feng Zhang;Antoine Roger Adamantidis;Garret D Stuber

  • Subsecond dopamine release promotes cocaine seeking

    Paul E. M. Phillips;Garret D. Stuber;Michael L. A. V. Heien;R. Mark Wightman

  • Genome-wide association study identifies eight risk loci and implicates metabo-psychiatric origins for anorexia nervosa

    Hunna J. Watson;Hunna J. Watson;Hunna J. Watson;Zeynep Yilmaz;Laura M. Thornton;Christopher Hübel;Christopher Hübel

  • Excitatory transmission from the amygdala to nucleus accumbens facilitates reward seeking

    Garret D. Stuber;Garret D. Stuber;Dennis R. Sparta;Dennis R. Sparta;Alice M. Stamatakis;Wieke A. van Leeuwen

  • Dopamine Operates as a Subsecond Modulator of Food Seeking

    Mitchell F. Roitman;Garret D. Stuber;Paul E. M. Phillips;R. Mark Wightman

  • Synaptic and behavioral profile of multiple glutamatergic inputs to the nucleus accumbens

    Jonathan P. Britt;Faiza Benaliouad;Ross A. McDevitt;Garret D. Stuber

  • Distinct extended amygdala circuits for divergent motivational states

    Joshua H. Jennings;Dennis R. Sparta;Alice M. Stamatakis;Randall L. Ung

  • Recombinase-Driver Rat Lines: Tools, Techniques, and Optogenetic Application to Dopamine-Mediated Reinforcement

    Ilana B. Witten;Elizabeth E. Steinberg;Soo Yeun Lee;Thomas J. Davidson

  • Efficient and accurate extraction of in vivo calcium signals from microendoscopic video data

    Pengcheng Zhou;Shanna L Resendez;Jose Rodriguez-Romaguera;Jessica C Jimenez

  • Activation of VTA GABA Neurons Disrupts Reward Consumption

    Ruud van Zessen;Jana L. Phillips;Evgeny A. Budygin;Garret D. Stuber

  • Activation of lateral habenula inputs to the ventral midbrain promotes behavioral avoidance

    Alice M Stamatakis;Garret D Stuber

  • Dopaminergic terminals in the nucleus accumbens but not the dorsal striatum corelease glutamate.

    Garret D. Stuber;Thomas S. Hnasko;Jonathan P. Britt;Robert H. Edwards

  • Visualizing Hypothalamic Network Dynamics for Appetitive and Consummatory Behaviors

    Joshua H. Jennings;Randall L. Ung;Shanna L. Resendez;Alice M. Stamatakis

  • Lateral Hypothalamic Circuits for Feeding and Reward

    Garret D Stuber;Roy A Wise

  • The Inhibitory Circuit Architecture of the Lateral Hypothalamus Orchestrates Feeding

    Joshua H. Jennings;Giorgio Rizzi;Giorgio Rizzi;Alice M. Stamatakis;Randall L. Ung

  • Optogenetic interrogation of dopaminergic modulation of the multiple phases of reward-seeking behavior.

    Antoine Roger Adamantidis;Hsing-Chen Tsai;Benjamin Boutrel;Feng Zhang

  • Construction of implantable optical fibers for long-term optogenetic manipulation of neural circuits

    Dennis R Sparta;Alice M Stamatakis;Jana L Phillips;Nanna Hovelsø;Nanna Hovelsø;Nanna Hovelsø

  • Overoxidation of carbon-fiber microelectrodes enhances dopamine adsorption and increases sensitivity.

    Michael L. A. V. Heien;Paul E. M. Phillips;Garret D. Stuber;Andrew T. Seipel

  • Prefrontal cortex output circuits guide reward seeking through divergent cue encoding

    James M. Otis;Vijay M. K. Namboodiri;Ana M. Matan;Elisa S. Voets

  • Overlapping Brain Circuits for Homeostatic and Hedonic Feeding

    Mark A. Rossi;Garret D. Stuber

  • A Unique Population of Ventral Tegmental Area Neurons Inhibits the Lateral Habenula to Promote Reward

    Alice M. Stamatakis;Joshua H. Jennings;Randall L. Ung;Grace A. Blair

  • Reward-Predictive Cues Enhance Excitatory Synaptic Strength onto Midbrain Dopamine Neurons

    Garret D. Stuber;Marianne Klanker;Bram de Ridder;M. Scott Bowers

Frequent Co-Authors

Antonello Bonci
Antonello Bonci National Institute on Drug Abuse
Karl Deisseroth
Karl Deisseroth Stanford University
R. Mark Wightman
R. Mark Wightman University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Kay M. Tye
Kay M. Tye Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Regina M. Carelli
Regina M. Carelli University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Evgeny A. Budygin
Evgeny A. Budygin Wake Forest University
Michael R. Bruchas
Michael R. Bruchas University of Washington
Paul E. M. Phillips
Paul E. M. Phillips University of Washington
Cynthia M. Bulik
Cynthia M. Bulik University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Garret D. Stuber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles