World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
67
Citations
15174
World Ranking
2896
National Ranking
1342

Regina M. Carelli publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Regina M. Carelli sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 130 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Regina M. Carelli D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Regina M. Carelli sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Regina M. Carelli is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with a specialization in cellular and molecular neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, molecular biology, neurology, and biomedical engineering.

Their work covers several main topics within the neuroscientific field, including:

  • Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering

Carelli has published extensively across various venues, especially contributing to UNC Libraries. The most frequent journals where their research appears include:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Neuropsychopharmacology

Several recent papers exemplify the scope and range of Carelli's research interests:

  • "Activation of Infralimbic to Nucleus Accumbens Shell Pathway Suppresses Conditioned Aversion in Male But Not Female Rats," 2020, Journal of Neuroscience
  • "Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Rescues Cocaine-Induced Prefrontal Hypoactivity and Restores Flexible Behavior," 2021, Biological Psychiatry
  • "Alpha-tACS effect on inhibitory control and feasibility of administration in community outpatient substance use treatment," 2020, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • "A sex-dependent role for the prelimbic cortex in impulsive action both before and following early cocaine abstinence," 2021, Neuropsychopharmacology
  • "Prelimbic cortex and nucleus accumbens core resting state signaling dynamics as a biomarker for cocaine seeking behaviors," 2023, Addiction Neuroscience

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • R. Mark Wightman
  • Michael P. Saddoris
  • Robert Wheeler
  • Jeremy J. Day
  • Elizabeth A. West

Best Publications

  • Subsecond dopamine release promotes cocaine seeking

    Paul E. M. Phillips;Garret D. Stuber;Michael L. A. V. Heien;R. Mark Wightman

  • Dopamine Operates as a Subsecond Modulator of Food Seeking

    Mitchell F. Roitman;Garret D. Stuber;Paul E. M. Phillips;R. Mark Wightman

  • Associative learning mediates dynamic shifts in dopamine signaling in the nucleus accumbens

    Jeremy J Day;Mitchell F Roitman;R Mark Wightman;Regina M Carelli

  • Nucleus accumbens neurons are innately tuned for rewarding and aversive taste stimuli, encode their predictors, and are linked to motor output.

    Mitchell F. Roitman;Robert A. Wheeler;Regina M. Carelli

  • Cocaine but Not Natural Reward Self-Administration nor Passive Cocaine Infusion Produces Persistent LTP in the VTA

    Billy T. Chen;M. Scott Bowers;Miquel Martin;F. Woodward Hopf

  • Evidence that separate neural circuits in the nucleus accumbens encode cocaine versus "natural" (water and food) reward.

    Regina M. Carelli;Stephanie G. Ijames;Alison J. Crumling

  • Real-time chemical responses in the nucleus accumbens differentiate rewarding and aversive stimuli

    Mitchell F Roitman;Robert A Wheeler;R Mark Wightman;Regina M Carelli

  • The Nucleus Accumbens and Pavlovian Reward Learning

    Jeremy J. Day;Regina M. Carelli

  • Synaptic Overflow of Dopamine in the Nucleus Accumbens Arises from Neuronal Activity in the Ventral Tegmental Area

    Leslie A. Sombers;Manna Beyene;Regina M. Carelli;R. Mark Wightman

  • Preferential Enhancement of Dopamine Transmission within the Nucleus Accumbens Shell by Cocaine Is Attributable to a Direct Increase in Phasic Dopamine Release Events

    Brandon J. Aragona;Nathan A. Cleaveland;Garret D. Stuber;Jeremy J. Day

  • Rapid dopamine signaling in the nucleus accumbens during contingent and noncontingent cocaine administration.

    Garret D Stuber;Mitchell F Roitman;Paul E M Phillips;Regina M Carelli

  • Coordinated Accumbal Dopamine Release and Neural Activity Drive Goal-Directed Behavior

    Joseph F. Cheer;Brandon J. Aragona;Michael L.A.V. Heien;Andrew T. Seipel

  • Differential Dopamine Release Dynamics in the Nucleus Accumbens Core and Shell Reveal Complementary Signals for Error Prediction and Incentive Motivation

    Michael P. Saddoris;Fabio Cacciapaglia;R Mark Mark Wightman;Regina M Carelli

  • A comparison of nucleus accumbens neuronal firing patterns during cocaine self-administration and water reinforcement in rats

    RM Carelli;SA Deadwyler

  • Representation of the body by single neurons in the dorsolateral striatum of the awake, unrestrained rat.

    Regina M. Carelli;Mark O. West

  • A region in the dorsolateral striatum of the rat exhibiting single-unit correlations with specific locomotor limb movements.

    M. O. West;R. M. Carelli;M. Pomerantz;S. M. Cohen

  • Nucleus accumbens cell firing during goal-directed behaviors for cocaine vs. 'natural' reinforcement.

    Regina M Carelli

  • Phasic Nucleus Accumbens Dopamine Release Encodes Effort- and Delay-Related Costs

    Jeremy J. Day;Joshua L. Jones;R. Mark Wightman;Regina M. Carelli

  • Dopamine release is heterogeneous within microenvironments of the rat nucleus accumbens

    R. Mark Wightman;Michael L A V Heien;Kate M. Wassum;Leslie A. Sombers

  • Behavioral and Electrophysiological Indices of Negative Affect Predict Cocaine Self-Administration

    Robert A. Wheeler;Robert C. Twining;Joshua L. Jones;Jennifer M. Slater

  • Cocaine-Associated Stimuli Increase Cocaine Seeking and Activate Accumbens Core Neurons after Abstinence

    Jonathan A. Hollander;Regina M. Carelli

Frequent Co-Authors

R. Mark Wightman
R. Mark Wightman University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Mitchell F. Roitman
Mitchell F. Roitman University of Illinois at Chicago
Garret D. Stuber
Garret D. Stuber University of Washington
Brandon J. Aragona
Brandon J. Aragona University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Sam A. Deadwyler
Sam A. Deadwyler Wake Forest University
Joseph F. Cheer
Joseph F. Cheer University of Maryland, Baltimore
Paul E. M. Phillips
Paul E. M. Phillips University of Washington
Mark O. West
Mark O. West Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Patricia S. Grigson
Patricia S. Grigson Pennsylvania State University
Stacey B. Daughters
Stacey B. Daughters University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Regina M. Carelli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles