World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
8717
World Ranking
7204
National Ranking
3902

Stacey B. Daughters publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stacey B. Daughters sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 124 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stacey B. Daughters D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stacey B. Daughters sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stacey B. Daughters is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research spans the intersecting fields of medicine and psychology, with a focus on epidemiology, applied psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, and cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist's work primarily addresses topics including substance abuse treatment and outcomes, digital mental health interventions, HIV-related drug use and sexual risk, mental health research topics, anxiety and depression, psychometrics, cognitive processes, behavioral health interventions, and HIV/AIDS research and interventions.

Recent publications showcase involvement in substance use disorder treatment, behavioral interventions, and digital mental health applications. Selected recent papers include:

  • "Expanding the continuum of substance use disorder treatment: Nonabstinence approaches" (2021), Clinical Psychology Review
  • "Alpha-tACS effect on inhibitory control and feasibility of administration in community outpatient substance use treatment" (2020), Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • "Day-to-day individual alpha frequency variability measured by a mobile EEG device relates to anxiety" (2023), European Journal of Neuroscience
  • "Act Healthy: A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating a Behavioral Activation Intervention to Address Substance Use and Medication Adherence Among Low-Income, Black/African American Individuals Living with HIV/AIDS" (2021), AIDS and Behavior
  • "Group behavioral activation with and without a smartphone app in intensive outpatient treatment for substance use disorder: A three-arm randomized controlled trial" (2022), Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Frequent coauthors in their research include Louisa Kane, Catherine Paquette, Jessica F. Magidson, C.J. Seitz-Brown, and Flavio Fröhlich.

Publishing outlets where their work commonly appears include UNC Libraries, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Clinical Psychology Review, Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment, and Behaviour Research and Therapy.

Best Publications

  • Ten year revision of the brief behavioral activation treatment for depression: revised treatment manual.

    C. W. Lejuez;Derek R. Hopko;Ron E. Acierno;Stacey B. Daughters

  • DISTRESS TOLERANCE AS A PREDICTOR OF EARLY TREATMENT DROPOUT IN A RESIDENTIAL SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT FACILITY

    Stacey B. Daughters;C. W. Lejuez;Marina A. Bornovalova;Christopher W. Kahler

  • Reliability and Validity of the Youth Version of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART–Y) in the Assessment of Risk-Taking Behavior Among Inner-City Adolescents

    C. W. Lejuez;Will Aklin;Stacey Daughters;Michael Zvolensky

  • Transcranial electrical and magnetic stimulation (tES and TMS) for addiction medicine: A consensus paper on the present state of the science and the road ahead

    Hamed Ekhtiari;Hosna Tavakoli;Giovanni Addolorato;Chris Baeken

  • Distress tolerance and early adolescent externalizing and internalizing symptoms: The moderating role of gender and ethnicity

    Stacey B. Daughters;Elizabeth K. Reynolds;Laura MacPherson;Christopher W. Kahler

  • Impulsivity as a Common Process Across Borderline Personality and Substance Use Disorders

    Marina A. Bornovalova;C. W. Lejuez;Stacey Brooke Daughters;M. Zachary Rosenthal

  • Differences in impulsivity and risk-taking propensity between primary users of crack cocaine and primary users of heroin in a residential substance-use program

    Marina A. Bornovalova;Stacey B. Daughters;Gustavo Daniel Hernandez;Jerry B. Richards

  • Shared Variance among Self-Report and Behavioral Measures of Distress Intolerance

    R. Kathryn McHugh;Stacey B. Daughters;Carl W. Lejuez;Heather W. Murray

  • Initial RCT of a distress tolerance treatment for individuals with substance use disorders.

    Marina A. Bornovalova;Kim L. Gratz;Stacey B. Daughters;Elizabeth D. Hunt

  • Psychological distress tolerance and duration of most recent abstinence attempt among residential treatment-seeking substance abusers.

    Stacey B. Daughters;C. W. Lejuez;Christopher W. Kahler;David R. Strong

  • Effectiveness of a Brief Behavioral Treatment for Inner-City Illicit Drug Users With Elevated Depressive Symptoms: The Life Enhancement Treatment for Substance Use (LETS Act!)

    Stacey B. Daughters;Ashley R. Braun;Marsha N. Sargeant;Elizabeth K. Reynolds

  • Risk-taking propensity and risky sexual behavior of individuals in residential substance use treatment

    C.W. Lejuez;Burnetta L. Simmons;Will M. Aklin;Stacey B. Daughters

  • An analogue investigation of the relationships among perceived parental criticism, negative affect, and borderline personality disorder features: the role of thought suppression

    Jennifer S. Cheavens;M. Zachary Rosenthal;Stacey B. Daughters;Jennifer Nowak

  • A multimodal assessment of the relationship between emotion dysregulation and borderline personality disorder among inner-city substance users in residential treatment

    Marina A. Bornovalova;Kim L. Gratz;Stacey B. Daughters;Bettina Nick

  • Construct Validity of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART): Relationship with MDMA Use by Inner-City Drug Users in Residential Treatment

    Derek R. Hopko;C. W. Lejuez;Stacey B. Daughters;Will M. Aklin

  • Risk Factors in the Relationship Between Gender and Crack/Cocaine

    C. W. Lejuez;Marina A. Bornovalova;Elizabeth K. Reynolds;Stacey B. Daughters

  • The role of anxiety sensitivity and difficulties in emotion regulation in posttraumatic stress disorder among crack/cocaine dependent patients in residential substance abuse treatment.

    Michael J. McDermott;Matthew T. Tull;Kim L. Gratz;Stacey B. Daughters

  • An Examination of Psychiatric Comorbidities as a Function of Gender and Substance Type within an Inpatient Substance Use Treatment Program

    Kevin W. Chen;Kevin W. Chen;Annie N. Banducci;Leila Guller;Richard J. Macatee

  • The effect of a behavioral activation treatment for substance use on post‐treatment abstinence: a randomized controlled trial

    Stacey B. Daughters;Jessica F. Magidson;Deepika Anand;C. J. Seitz-Brown

  • Anxiety sensitivity: a unique predictor of dropout among inner-city heroin and crack/cocaine users in residential substance use treatment.

    C.W. Lejuez;Michael J. Zvolensky;Stacey B. Daughters;Marina A. Bornovalova

  • Differences in Impulsivity and Sexual Risk Behavior Among Inner-City Crack/Cocaine Users and Heroin Users

    C.W. Lejuez;Marina A. Bornovalova;Stacey B. Daughters;John J. Curtin

Frequent Co-Authors

Carl W. Lejuez
Carl W. Lejuez Stony Brook University
Jessica F. Magidson
Jessica F. Magidson University of Maryland, College Park
Marina A. Bornovalova
Marina A. Bornovalova University of South Florida
Christopher W. Kahler
Christopher W. Kahler Brown University
David R. Strong
David R. Strong University of California, San Diego
Kim L. Gratz
Kim L. Gratz University of Toledo
Michael J. Zvolensky
Michael J. Zvolensky University of Houston
Linda C. Mayes
Linda C. Mayes Yale University
Matthew T. Tull
Matthew T. Tull University of Toledo
Kenneth H. Beck
Kenneth H. Beck University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up a range of online education options and future career paths. Many students choose to specialize in school counseling, a field that plays a crucial role in supporting students’ academic and personal development.

Requirements for becoming a school counselor vary by state. For example, becoming a school counselor in Virginia typically requires a master’s degree in counseling and a state-issued license. In comparison, Washington school counselor education requirements include completing an approved education program and relevant certification exams.

Other states have their own processes as well. Learn more about how to become a school counselor in West Virginia or discover the steps for becoming a school counselor in Wisconsin.

No matter the location, most pathways to a school counseling career emphasize advanced study in counseling, supervised fieldwork, and passing state exams. Online psychology degrees can be a flexible starting point, helping you meet these diverse state requirements as you prepare for this rewarding role.

Best Scientists Citing Stacey B. Daughters

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles