World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
8130
World Ranking
8150
National Ranking
4373

Marina A. Bornovalova publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marina A. Bornovalova sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 103 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Marina A. Bornovalova D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marina A. Bornovalova sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marina A. Bornovalova is affiliated with the University of South Florida in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Psychology, with significant contributions to Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Genetics, and Philosophy. The body of work reflects a focus on personality disorders, psychopathology, mental health research, functional brain connectivity, child and adolescent psychosocial development, and topics related to anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes.

Recent publications by Bornovalova include:

  • Appropriate Use of Bifactor Analysis in Psychopathology Research: Appreciating Benefits and Limitations (2020), Biological Psychiatry
  • HiTOP Assessment of Externalizing Antagonism and Disinhibition (2021), Assessment
  • Dimensional and transdiagnostic phenotypes in psychiatric genome-wide association studies (2023), Molecular Psychiatry
  • Comorbidity in borderline personality: understanding dynamics in development (2020), Current Opinion in Psychology
  • The general psychopathology factor (p) from adolescence to adulthood: Exploring the developmental trajectories of p using a multi-method approach (2022), Development and Psychopathology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Bornovalova include:

  • Haya Fatimah
  • Alexandria M. Choate
  • Katherine Jonas
  • Roman Kotov
  • Robert F. Krueger

Notable publication venues where their work appears repeatedly are:

  • Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment
  • Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science
  • Psychometrika
  • Arabixiv (OSF Preprints)
  • Biological Psychiatry

Bornovalova's main topics of research emphasize:

  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

The diversity of Bornovalova's research interests and collaborations contribute to the understanding of complex psychological and psychiatric phenomena through multi-method approaches, with an emphasis on dimensional and transdiagnostic frameworks in psychopathology. Their work also engages with the dynamics of comorbidity in personality disorders and the developmental trajectories of general psychopathology across adolescence and adulthood.

Best Publications

  • Progress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology

    Robert F. Krueger;Roman Kotov;David Watson;Miriam K. Forbes

  • A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Can Transform Mental Health Research

    Christopher C. Conway;Miriam K. Forbes;Kelsie T. Forbush;Eiko I. Fried

  • DISTRESS TOLERANCE AS A PREDICTOR OF EARLY TREATMENT DROPOUT IN A RESIDENTIAL SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT FACILITY

    Stacey B. Daughters;C. W. Lejuez;Marina A. Bornovalova;Christopher W. Kahler

  • The time has come for dimensional personality disorder diagnosis

    Christopher J. Hopwood;Roman Kotov;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson

  • A laboratory-based study of the relationship between childhood abuse and experiential avoidance among inner-city substance users: the role of emotional nonacceptance

    Kim L Gratz;Marina Bornovalova;Ayesha Delany-Brumsey;Bettina Nick

  • Stability, Change, and Heritability of Borderline Personality Disorder Traits from Adolescence to Adulthood: A Longitudinal Twin Study

    Marina A. Bornovalova;Brian M. Hicks;William G. Iacono;Matt McGue

  • Impulsivity as a Common Process Across Borderline Personality and Substance Use Disorders

    Marina A. Bornovalova;C. W. Lejuez;Stacey Brooke Daughters;M. Zachary Rosenthal

  • Differences in impulsivity and risk-taking propensity between primary users of crack cocaine and primary users of heroin in a residential substance-use program

    Marina A. Bornovalova;Stacey B. Daughters;Gustavo Daniel Hernandez;Jerry B. Richards

  • Initial RCT of a distress tolerance treatment for individuals with substance use disorders.

    Marina A. Bornovalova;Kim L. Gratz;Stacey B. Daughters;Elizabeth D. Hunt

  • Testing the relations between impulsivity-related traits, suicidality, and nonsuicidal self-injury: a test of the incremental validity of the UPPS model.

    Donald R. Lynam;Joshua D. Miller;Drew J. Miller;Marina A. Bornovalova

  • A multimodal assessment of the relationship between emotion dysregulation and borderline personality disorder among inner-city substance users in residential treatment

    Marina A. Bornovalova;Kim L. Gratz;Stacey B. Daughters;Bettina Nick

  • Tests of a direct effect of childhood abuse on adult borderline personality disorder traits: a longitudinal discordant twin design.

    Marina A. Bornovalova;Brooke M. Huibregtse;Brian M. Hicks;Margaret Keyes

  • Conditioned taste aversion and amygdala lesions in the rat: a critical review.

    Steve Reilly;Marina A Bornovalova

  • Risk taking differences on a behavioral task as a function of potential reward/loss magnitude and individual differences in impulsivity and sensation seeking.

    Marina A. Bornovalova;Alex Cashman-Rolls;Jennifer M. O'Donnell;Kenneth Ettinger

  • Risk Factors in the Relationship Between Gender and Crack/Cocaine

    C. W. Lejuez;Marina A. Bornovalova;Elizabeth K. Reynolds;Stacey B. Daughters

  • Differences in risk-taking propensity across inner-city adolescent ever- and never-smokers.

    C. W. Lejuez;Will M. Aklin;Marina A. Bornovalova;Eric T. Moolchan

  • Factors associated with co-occurring borderline personality disorder among inner-city substance users: the roles of childhood maltreatment, negative affect intensity/reactivity, and emotion dysregulation

    Kim L. Gratz;Matthew T. Tull;David E. Baruch;Marina A. Bornovalova

  • Appropriate Use of Bifactor Analysis in Psychopathology Research: Appreciating Benefits and Limitations.

    Marina A. Bornovalova;Alexandria M. Choate;Haya Fatimah;Karl J. Petersen

  • Generalized expectancies for negative mood regulation predict change in anxiety and depression among college students.

    Jon D. Kassel;Marina Bornovalova;Neera Mehta

  • Familial Transmission and Heritability of Childhood Disruptive Disorders

    Marina A. Bornovalova;Brian M. Hicks;William G. Iacono;Matt McGue

Frequent Co-Authors

Carl W. Lejuez
Carl W. Lejuez Stony Brook University
Stacey B. Daughters
Stacey B. Daughters University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
William G. Iacono
William G. Iacono University of Minnesota
Matt McGue
Matt McGue University of Minnesota
Kim L. Gratz
Kim L. Gratz University of Toledo
Christopher J. Patrick
Christopher J. Patrick Florida State University
Brian M. Hicks
Brian M. Hicks University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Christopher J. Hopwood
Christopher J. Hopwood University of Zurich
Robert F. Krueger
Robert F. Krueger University of Minnesota
Bo Bach
Bo Bach University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in studying Psychology in the USA, there are several related online degrees worth exploring—especially in the field of social work. Many students choose social work for its overlap with psychological principles and direct impact on communities.

Affordability is a key concern. There are many options for the cheapest social work degrees in Utah and the cheapest social work degrees in Virginia, both of which offer accredited online programs. Those closer to the capital can consider the cheapest social work degrees in Washington, D.C. for accessible education opportunities.

Students in western states can find even more options through a wide selection of affordable social work programs in the West. Graduating with a background in psychology or social work opens doors to rewarding careers in counseling, mental health services, school support roles, and community outreach. Choose a pathway that aligns with your goals and budget for a meaningful professional journey.

Best Scientists Citing Marina A. Bornovalova

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles