World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
60
Citations
16530
World Ranking
1444
National Ranking
689

Computer Science

D-Index
60
Citations
16538
World Ranking
3206
National Ranking
1557

Kinshuk publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kinshuk sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 493 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Kinshuk D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kinshuk sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kinshuk is affiliated with the University of North Texas in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields of study, predominantly in Computer Science, Psychology, and Social Sciences. Within these fields, their work is particularly concentrated in subfields such as Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Information Systems, Education, and Artificial Intelligence.

Their scholarly output includes recent papers focused on technology-enhanced education. Notable publications are:

  • How do pedagogical approaches affect the impact of augmented reality on education? A meta-analysis and research synthesis (2020), Educational Research Review
  • The effectiveness of partial pair programming on elementary school students' Computational Thinking skills and self-efficacy (2020), Computers & Education
  • Virtual reality and gamification in education: a systematic review (2024), Educational Technology Research and Development
  • Augmented Reality in Education: An Overview of Twenty-Five Years of Research (2021), Contemporary Educational Technology
  • Effect of the flipped classroom on the mathematics performance of middle school students (2020), Educational Technology Research and Development

Kinshuk has frequently collaborated with several co-authors. Among the most frequent are Ahmed Tlili, Daniel Burgos, Juan Garzón, Jorge Bacca, and Ronghuai Huang.

The scholar's publications often appear in venues such as Educational Technology Research and Development, Smart Learning Environments, Education and Information Technologies, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, and Computers & Education.

Main topics covered in their research include Online Learning and Analytics, Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods, Mobile Learning in Education, Online and Blended Learning, Augmented Reality Applications, Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts, and Technology-Enhanced Education Studies.

Kinshuk has also contributed to book publications with Springer Nature. Titles include Smart Learning for A Sustainable Society (2023), Resilience and Future of Smart Learning (2022), and Expanding Global Horizons Through Technology Enhanced Language Learning (2021).

Best Publications

  • Augmented Reality Trends in Education: A Systematic Review of Research and Applications.

    Jorge Bacca;Silvia Baldiris;Ramon Fabregat;Sabine Graf

  • Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead?

    Yunglung Chen;Yuping Wang;Kinshuk;Nian-Shing Chen

  • Examining the Factors Influencing Participants' Knowledge Sharing Behavior in Virtual Learning Communities

    Irene Y.L. Chen;Nian Shing Chen;Kinshuk

  • Evolution Is not enough: Revolutionizing Current Learning Environments to Smart Learning Environments

    Kinshuk;Nian-Shing Chen;I-Ling Cheng;Sie Wai Chew;Sie Wai Chew

  • EFFECTS OF SHORT-TERM MEMORY AND CONTENT REPRESENTATION TYPE ON MOBILE LANGUAGE LEARNING

    Nian-Shing Chen;Sheng-Wen Hsieh;Kinshuk

  • A model for synchronous learning using the Internet

    Nian‐Shing Chen;Hsiu‐Chia Ko;Kinshuk;Taiyu Lin

  • Factors Impacting Teachers' Adoption of Mobile Learning.

    Kathryn Mac Callum;Lynn Jeffrey;Kinshuk

  • A model for social presence in online classrooms

    Chun-Wang Wei;Nian-Shing Chen;Kinshuk

  • Analysis of learners' navigational behaviour and their learning styles in an online course

    Sabine Graf;Tzu-Chien Liu;Kinshuk

  • Identifying Learning Styles in Learning Management Systems by Using Indications from Students' Behaviour

    S. Graf;Kinshuk;Tzu-Chien Liu

  • How do pedagogical approaches affect the impact of augmented reality on education? A meta-analysis and research synthesis

    Juan Garzón;Juan Garzón;Kinshuk;Silvia Baldiris;Jaime Gutiérrez

  • A blended synchronous learning model for educational international collaboration

    Megan Hastie;I‐Chun Hung;Nian‐Shing Chen;Kinshuk

  • In-Depth Analysis of the Felder-Silverman Learning Style Dimensions

    Sabine Graf;Silvia Rita Viola;Tommaso Leo;Kinshuk

  • A fully personalization strategy of E-learning scenarios

    Fathi Essalmi;Leila Jemni Ben Ayed;Mohamed Jemni;Kinshuk

  • An investigation of attitudes of students and teachers about participating in a context-aware ubiquitous learning activity

    Ju Ling Shih;Hui Chun Chu;Gwo Jen Hwang;Kinshuk

  • Supporting Teachers in Identifying Students' Learning Styles in Learning Management Systems: An Automatic Student Modelling Approach

    Sabine Graf;Kinshuk;Tzu Chien Liu

  • Comparing the role of ICT literacy and anxiety in the adoption of mobile learning

    Kathryn Mac Callum;Lynn Jeffrey;Kinshuk

  • Mining e-Learning domain concept map from academic articles

    Nian-Shing Chen;Kinshuk;Chun-Wang Wei;Hong-Jhe Chen

  • Learning styles and cognitive traits - Their relationship and its benefits in web-based educational systems

    Sabine Graf;Tzu-Chien Liu;Kinshuk;Nian-Shing Chen

  • Research on e-learning in the workplace 2000–2012: A bibliometric analysis of the literature

    Bo Cheng;Minhong Wang;Anders I. Mørch;Nian-Shing Chen

  • Augmenting paper-based reading activity with direct access to digital materials and scaffolded questioning

    Nian-Shing Chen;Daniel Chia-En Teng;Cheng-Han Lee;Kinshuk

Frequent Co-Authors

Sabine Graf
Sabine Graf Athabasca University
Nian-Shing Chen
Nian-Shing Chen National Taiwan Normal University
Demetrios G. Sampson
Demetrios G. Sampson University of Piraeus
J. Michael Spector
J. Michael Spector University of North Texas
Yueh-Min Huang
Yueh-Min Huang National Cheng Kung University
Erkki Sutinen
Erkki Sutinen University of Turku
Dirk Ifenthaler
Dirk Ifenthaler University of Mannheim
Stephen J. H. Yang
Stephen J. H. Yang National Central University
Rob Koper
Rob Koper Open University in the Netherlands
Kuo-En Chang
Kuo-En Chang Tunghai University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online study options provide flexibility and a variety of pathways for those interested in Social Sciences and Humanities. Many students are drawn to online masters degree programs to gain specialized knowledge and boost their careers, often while continuing to work.

Cost is a big consideration for postgraduate study. If you’re wondering how much does it cost to get a masters in psychology, you’ll find affordable options among many reputable institutions. For those seeking an even faster track, there are accelerated doctoral programs in education online that allow you to earn advanced credentials in less time.

Bachelor’s degrees can also be earned quickly through 2 year accelerated bachelor degrees online. If you’re seeking an efficient route to graduate study, you might also explore a online masters degree that can be completed in a year.

No matter your stage or goal, these flexible online pathways make career advancement in Social Sciences and Humanities more accessible than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing Kinshuk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles