World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
97
Citations
39586
World Ranking
9186
National Ranking
4740

Nadine Tung publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadine Tung sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 361 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Nadine Tung D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadine Tung sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nadine Tung is affiliated with Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on oncology, genetics, and cancer-related fields within medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

The main fields of study for Tung include:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Their subfields of study highlight areas such as:

  • Oncology
  • Genetics
  • Cancer Research
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Molecular Biology

Tung's research covers several key topics related to cancer, including:

  • BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
  • Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
  • HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology

Among recent significant publications authored or co-authored by Tung are:

  • TBCRC 048: Phase II Study of Olaparib for Metastatic Breast Cancer and Mutations in Homologous Recombination-Related Genes, 2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Management of Hereditary Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society for Radiation Oncology, and Society of Surgical Oncology Guideline, 2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • PARP inhibition in breast cancer: progress made and future hopes, 2022, npj Breast Cancer

In addition to personal publications, Tung frequently collaborates with other researchers. The most frequent co-authors include:

  • Sara M. Tolaney
  • Ian E. Krop
  • Eric P. Winer
  • Antonio C. Wolff
  • Judy E. Garber

The venues where Tung publishes regularly emphasize oncology and cancer research. These frequent publication venues are:

  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Cancer Research
  • Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
  • npj Breast Cancer
  • British Journal of Cancer

Best Publications

  • Olaparib for Metastatic Breast Cancer in Patients with a Germline BRCA Mutation

    Mark Robson;Seock Ah Im;Elżbieta Senkus;Binghe Xu

  • Association of Risk-Reducing Surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation Carriers With Cancer Risk and Mortality

    Susan M. Domchek;Tara M. Friebel;Christian F. Singer;D. Gareth Evans

  • Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Cisplatin in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

    Daniel P. Silver;Andrea L. Richardson;Aron C. Eklund;Zhigang C. Wang

  • Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) Score Predicts Response to Platinum-Containing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

    Melinda L. Telli;Kirsten M. Timms;Julia Reid;Bryan Hennessy

  • Assessing Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Solid Tumors: A Practical Review for Pathologists and Proposal for a Standardized Method from the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarkers Working Group Part 2 TILs in Melanoma, Gastrointestinal Tract Carcinomas, Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma and Mesothelioma, Endometrial and Ovarian Carcinomas, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck, Genitourinary Carcinomas, and Primary Brain Tumors

    Shona Hendry;Roberto Salgado;Thomas Gevaert;Prudence A. Russell;Prudence A. Russell

  • Assessing Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes in Solid Tumors: A Practical Review for Pathologists and Proposal for a Standardized Method from the International Immunooncology Biomarkers Working Group: Part 1: Assessing the Host Immune Response, TILs in Invasive Breast Carcinoma and Ductal Carcinoma in Situ, Metastatic Tumor Deposits and Areas for Further Research

    Shona Hendry;Roberto Salgado;Thomas Gevaert;Prudence A. Russell;Prudence A. Russell

  • Salpingo-oophorectomy and the Risk of Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneal Cancers in Women With a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation

    Amy Finch;Mario Beiner;Jan Lubinski;Henry T. Lynch

  • Contralateral Breast Cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers

    Kelly Metcalfe;Henry T. Lynch;Parviz Ghadirian;Nadine Tung

  • Pathology of Breast and Ovarian Cancers among BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: Results from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA).

    Nasim Mavaddat;Daniel Barrowdale;Irene L. Andrulis;Susan M. Domchek

  • Impact of Oophorectomy on Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Women With a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation

    Amy P.M. Finch;Jan Lubinski;Pål Møller;Christian F. Singer

  • OlympiAD final overall survival and tolerability results: Olaparib versus chemotherapy treatment of physician’s choice in patients with a germline BRCA mutation and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer

    M.E. Robson;N. Tung;P. Conte;S.-A. Im

  • Telomeric Allelic Imbalance Indicates Defective DNA Repair and Sensitivity to DNA-Damaging Agents

    Nicolai J. Birkbak;Nicolai J. Birkbak;Zhigang C. Wang;Zhigang C. Wang;Ji Young Kim;Aron C. Eklund

  • Frequency of mutations in individuals with breast cancer referred for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing using next‐generation sequencing with a 25‐gene panel

    Nadine Tung;Chiara Battelli;Brian Allen;Rajesh Kaldate

  • Association of type and location of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations with risk of breast and ovarian cancer.

    Timothy R. Rebbeck;Nandita Mitra;Fei Wan;Olga M. Sinilnikova

  • Frequency of Germline Mutations in 25 Cancer Susceptibility Genes in a Sequential Series of Patients With Breast Cancer

    Nadine Tung;Nancy U. Lin;John Kidd;Brian A. Allen

  • Oral contraceptives and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

    Steven A. Narod;Marie Pierre Dubé;Jan Klijn;Jan Lubinski

  • Identification of 12 new susceptibility loci for different histotypes of epithelial ovarian cancer

    Catherine M Phelan;Karoline B Kuchenbaecker;Karoline B Kuchenbaecker;Jonathan P Tyrer;Siddhartha P Kar

  • Genetic predisposition directs breast cancer phenotype by dictating progenitor cell fate

    Theresa A. Proia;Patricia J. Keller;Patricia J. Keller;Piyush B. Gupta;Ina Klebba;Ina Klebba

  • BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Analysis of 208 Ashkenazi Jewish Women with Ovarian Cancer

    Roxana Moslehi;Roxana Moslehi;William Chu;Beth Karlan;David Fishman

  • Genome-wide association study in BRCA1 mutation carriers identifies novel loci associated with breast and ovarian cancer risk

    Fergus J. Couch;Xianshu Wang;Lesley McGuffog;Andrew Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Judy Garber
Judy Garber Harvard University
Steven A. Narod
Steven A. Narod University of Toronto
Susan L. Neuhausen
Susan L. Neuhausen City Of Hope National Medical Center
Jan Lubinski
Jan Lubinski Pomeranian Medical University
Susan M. Domchek
Susan M. Domchek University of Pennsylvania
Henry T. Lynch
Henry T. Lynch Creighton University
Beth Y. Karlan
Beth Y. Karlan University of California, Los Angeles
Eitan Friedman
Eitan Friedman City University of New York
Jeffrey N. Weitzel
Jeffrey N. Weitzel Natera (United States)
Olufunmilayo I. Olopade
Olufunmilayo I. Olopade University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative and allied health pathways is a smart move for anyone interested in healthcare careers. If pursuing medical school isn't your ideal route, there are diverse online degree programs and certifications that can help you start or advance a healthcare career.

For those interested in managing patient data, consider a health information management bachelor degree online. These programs teach both technical and leadership skills, preparing graduates for fast-growing roles in healthcare administration.

If you're looking for a quick entry into the healthcare field, earning the cheapest medical coding certification online can lead to rewarding work in medical billing offices, clinics, or hospitals.

Nursing also remains a leading career option. Many students seek the cheapest np school to become nurse practitioners—an advanced, high-demand profession. Additionally, prospective nurses often ask how much does online nursing school cost to plan for a flexible and affordable path.

These online healthcare programs offer accessible routes to meaningful medical careers, combining quality training with cost-effective education options.

Best Scientists Citing Nadine Tung

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles