World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 75 1785 1606 1050 923 409 21089
Medicine 75 19097 17933 9520 8790 445 21763

Adam M. Leventhal publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Adam M. Leventhal between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Adam M. Leventhal published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 19.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 54 publications in 2021. 46 of the 484 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 54. Peak 54 publications in 2021. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 27 publications 2015: 41 publications 2016: 37 publications 2017: 36 publications 2018: 28 publications 2019: 27 publications 2020: 38 publications 2021: 54 publications 2022: 43 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 24 publications
2001 2025

484 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Adam M. Leventhal: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 1
2003 0
2004 1
2005 1
2006 4
2007 6
2008 6
2009 9
2010 12
2011 14
2012 14
2013 12
2014 27
2015 41
2016 37
2017 36
2018 28
2019 27
2020 38
2021 54
2022 43
2023 26
2024 22
2025 24
Total 484
Download as CSV

Adam M. Leventhal publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam M. Leventhal sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–410 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 409 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43 409
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Adam M. Leventhal D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam M. Leventhal sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169 75
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Adam M. Leventhal is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with significant contributions in Physiology, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Applied Psychology, and Sociology and Political Science.

The scientist's main topics of study include Smoking Behavior and Cessation, Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes, Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, and Eating Disorders and Behaviors.

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Trends in the Age of Cigarette Smoking Initiation Among Young Adults in the US From 2002 to 2018" (2020, JAMA Network Open)
  • "Prevalence of Electronic Cigarette Dependence Among Youth and Its Association With Future Use" (2020, JAMA Network Open)
  • "Trends in Use and Perceptions of Nicotine Vaping Among US Youth From 2017 to 2020" (2020, JAMA Pediatrics)
  • "Effect of Exposure to e-Cigarettes With Salt vs Free-Base Nicotine on the Appeal and Sensory Experience of Vaping" (2021, JAMA Network Open)
  • "The relationship between screen-based sedentary behaviors and symptoms of depression and anxiety in youth: a systematic review of moderating variables" (2020, BMC Public Health)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Adam M. Leventhal include:

  • Jessica L. Barrington-Trimis
  • Junhan Cho
  • Jennifer B. Unger
  • Alyssa F. Harlow
  • Alayna P. Tackett

Their work has been published repeatedly in several key venues such as:

  • Tobacco Control
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Addictive Behaviors
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research
  • JAMA Network Open

Adam M. Leventhal was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2016, reflecting a degree of acknowledgment within the professional community.

Best Publications

  • Association Between Initial Use of e-Cigarettes and Subsequent Cigarette Smoking Among Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

    Samir Soneji;Samir Soneji;Jessica L. Barrington-Trimis;Thomas A. Wills;Adam M. Leventhal

  • Association of Electronic Cigarette Use With Initiation of Combustible Tobacco Product Smoking in Early Adolescence

    Adam M. Leventhal;David R. Strong;Matthew G. Kirkpatrick;Jennifer B. Unger

  • Anxiety, depression, and cigarette smoking: a transdiagnostic vulnerability framework to understanding emotion-smoking comorbidity.

    Adam M. Leventhal;Michael J. Zvolensky

  • E-Cigarettes and Future Cigarette Use

    Jessica L Barrington-Trimis;Robert Urman;Kiros Berhane;Jennifer B Unger

  • Electronic Cigarette Use and Respiratory Symptoms in Adolescents

    Rob McConnell;Jessica L. Barrington-Trimis;Kejia Wang;Robert Urman

  • Prevalence of e-Cigarette Use Among Adults in the United States, 2014-2018.

    Hongying Dai;Adam M Leventhal

  • Association of Digital Media Use With Subsequent Symptoms of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Among Adolescents

    Chaelin K. Ra;Junhan Cho;Matthew D. Stone;Julianne De La Cerda

  • Association of Electronic Cigarette Use With Subsequent Initiation of Tobacco Cigarettes in US Youths

    Kaitlyn M. Berry;Jessica L. Fetterman;Emelia J. Benjamin;Aruni Bhatnagar

  • Psychosocial Factors Associated With Adolescent Electronic Cigarette and Cigarette Use

    Jessica L. Barrington-Trimis;Kiros Berhane;Jennifer B. Unger;Tess Boley Cruz

  • Cigarette smoking and depression comorbidity: systematic review and proposed theoretical model

    Amanda R. Mathew;Lee Hogarth;Adam M. Leventhal;Jessica W. Cook

  • Adolescents’ Use of “Pod Mod” E-Cigarettes — Urgent Concerns

    Jessica L. Barrington-Trimis;Adam M. Leventhal

  • Trends in the Age of Cigarette Smoking Initiation Among Young Adults in the US From 2002 to 2018

    Jessica L. Barrington-Trimis;Jessica L. Braymiller;Jennifer B. Unger;Rob McConnell

  • Measuring hedonic capacity in depression: a psychometric analysis of three anhedonia scales.

    Adam M. Leventhal;Gregory S. Chasson;Evelina Tapia;Elizabeth K. Miller

  • Momentary assessment of affect, physical feeling states, and physical activity in children.

    Genevieve F. Dunton;Jimi Huh;Adam M. Leventhal;Nathaniel Riggs

  • Dimensions of depressive symptoms and smoking cessation.

    Adam M. Leventhal;Susan E. Ramsey;Richard A. Brown;Heather R. LaChance

  • Psychiatric comorbidity in adolescent electronic and conventional cigarette use.

    Adam M. Leventhal;David R. Strong;Steve Sussman;Matthew G. Kirkpatrick

  • Gender differences in acute tobacco withdrawal: effects on subjective, cognitive, and physiological measures.

    Adam M. Leventhal;Andrew J. Waters;Susan Boyd;Eric T. Moolchan

  • E-cigarette use and subsequent cigarette and marijuana use among Hispanic young adults.

    Jennifer B. Unger;Daniel W. Soto;Adam Leventhal

  • Bi-directional associations of electronic and combustible cigarette use onset patterns with depressive symptoms in adolescents.

    William V. Lechner;Tim Janssen;Christopher W. Kahler;Janet Audrain-McGovern

  • Associations of Electronic Cigarette Nicotine Concentration With Subsequent Cigarette Smoking and Vaping Levels in Adolescents

    Nicholas I. Goldenson;Adam M. Leventhal;Matthew D. Stone;Rob S. McConnell

  • Association of e-Cigarette Vaping and Progression to Heavier Patterns of Cigarette Smoking

    Adam M. Leventhal;Matthew D. Stone;Nafeesa Andrabi;Jessica Barrington-Trimis

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael J. Zvolensky
Michael J. Zvolensky University of Houston
Jennifer B. Unger
Jennifer B. Unger University of Southern California
Rob McConnell
Rob McConnell University of Southern California
Christopher W. Kahler
Christopher W. Kahler Brown University
Steve Sussman
Steve Sussman University of Southern California
Genevieve F. Dunton
Genevieve F. Dunton University of Southern California
Lara A. Ray
Lara A. Ray University of California, Los Angeles
David R. Strong
David R. Strong University of California, San Diego
Norman B. Schmidt
Norman B. Schmidt Florida State University
Chih-Ping Chou
Chih-Ping Chou University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online degree in Psychology opens diverse career avenues, from counseling to case management and beyond. Social work is one of the most popular and rewarding directions for psychology graduates. Requirements to enter this field vary by state, so it’s important to research your options based on where you plan to practice.

For example, those interested in becoming a social worker in Maine must meet specific educational and licensing standards. In Maryland, Maryland social work education requirements include accredited degrees and supervised experience.

Similarly, Massachusetts social work education requirements focus on accredited coursework and clinical practice, while the requirements to be a social worker in Michigan emphasize both degree attainment and exam passage.

Many universities now offer flexible online programs to help you meet these state-specific criteria while balancing work or family commitments. If you’re passionate about making a difference, researching related online degrees and understanding career pathways in your chosen state can place you on the right track toward a fulfilling social work role.

Best Scientists Citing Adam M. Leventhal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles