World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
33
Citations
6041
World Ranking
9421
National Ranking
3982

Brandon J. Aragona publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brandon J. Aragona sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 45 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Brandon J. Aragona D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brandon J. Aragona sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brandon J. Aragona is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Neuroscience, with a strong emphasis on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Additional subfields of study in their work include Social Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's work is concentrated on several key topics within neuroscience and behavior, including:

  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Neuroendocrine Regulation and Behavior
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Brandon J. Aragona has contributed to various research publications mostly appearing in UNC Libraries, the frequent venue for their work. Some of their recent papers include:

  • "In vivo voltammetric monitoring of catecholamine release in subterritories of the nucleus accumbens shell," 2020, UNC Libraries
  • "Coordinated Accumbal Dopamine Release and Neural Activity Drive Goal-Directed Behavior," 2021, UNC Libraries
  • "Regional specificity in the real-time development of phasic dopamine transmission patterns during acquisition of a cue-cocaine association in rats," 2020, UNC Libraries
  • "Basolateral Amygdala Modulates Terminal Dopamine Release in the Nucleus Accumbens and Conditioned Responding," 2021, UNC Libraries
  • "Dopamine and opioid systems interact within the nucleus accumbens to maintain monogamous pair bonds," 2020, UNC Libraries

Their collaborative research includes frequent co-authorships with several scientists, indicative of interdisciplinary work within neurobiology and related fields. These coauthors include:

  • R. Mark Wightman
  • Regina M. Carelli
  • Jeremy J. Day
  • Joseph F. Cheer
  • Michael L. Heien

The body of work by Brandon J. Aragona revolves around the mechanisms underlying neurotransmitter dynamics, neurochemical signaling, and behavioral outcomes, often using experimental models involving dopamine transmission and receptor interactions. Their research contributes to understanding brain function at a molecular level and its impact on behavioral processes and neuropharmacological effects.

Best Publications

  • Mesolimbic dopamine signals the value of work

    Arif A Hamid;Jeffrey R Pettibone;Omar S Mabrouk;Vaughn L Hetrick

  • Nucleus accumbens dopamine differentially mediates the formation and maintenance of monogamous pair bonds.

    Brandon J Aragona;Yan Liu;Y Joy Yu;J Thomas Curtis

  • A critical role for nucleus accumbens dopamine in partner-preference formation in male prairie voles.

    Brandon J. Aragona;Yan Liu;J. Thomas Curtis;Friedrich K. Stephan

  • Phasic dopamine release evoked by abused substances requires cannabinoid receptor activation.

    Joseph F. Cheer;Kate M. Wassum;Leslie A. Sombers;Michael L A V Heien

  • Preferential Enhancement of Dopamine Transmission within the Nucleus Accumbens Shell by Cocaine Is Attributable to a Direct Increase in Phasic Dopamine Release Events

    Brandon J. Aragona;Nathan A. Cleaveland;Garret D. Stuber;Jeremy J. Day

  • Dopamine, oxytocin, and vasopressin receptor binding in the medial prefrontal cortex of monogamous and promiscuous voles

    Michael D. Smeltzer;J. Thomas Curtis;Brandon J. Aragona;Zuoxin Wang

  • Coordinated Accumbal Dopamine Release and Neural Activity Drive Goal-Directed Behavior

    Joseph F. Cheer;Brandon J. Aragona;Michael L.A.V. Heien;Andrew T. Seipel

  • Aversive stimuli differentially modulate real-time dopamine transmission dynamics within the nucleus accumbens core and shell.

    Aneesha Badrinarayan;Seth A. Wescott;Caitlin M. Vander Weele;Benjamin T. Saunders

  • Dopamine release is heterogeneous within microenvironments of the rat nucleus accumbens

    R. Mark Wightman;Michael L A V Heien;Kate M. Wassum;Leslie A. Sombers

  • Neurochemical regulation of pair bonding in male prairie voles.

    Zuoxin Wang;Brandon J. Aragona

  • The prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster): an animal model for behavioral neuroendocrine research on pair bonding.

    Brandon J. Aragona;Zuoxin Wang

  • Cocaine Cues Drive Opposing Context-Dependent Shifts in Reward Processing and Emotional State

    Robert A. Wheeler;Brandon J. Aragona;Katherine A. Fuhrmann;Joshua L. Jones

  • Dopamine regulation of social choice in a monogamous rodent species

    Brandon J Aragona;Zuoxin Wang

  • Regional specificity in the real-time development of phasic dopamine transmission patterns during acquisition of a cue-cocaine association in rats.

    Brandon J. Aragona;Jeremy J. Day;Mitchell F. Roitman;Nathan A. Cleaveland

  • Basolateral Amygdala Modulates Terminal Dopamine Release in the Nucleus Accumbens and Conditioned Responding

    Joshua L. Jones;Jeremy J. Day;Brandon J. Aragona;Robert A. Wheeler

  • Rapid dopamine transmission within the nucleus accumbens: dramatic difference between morphine and oxycodone delivery.

    Caitlin M. Vander Weele;Kirsten A. Porter-Stransky;Omar S. Mabrouk;Vedran Lovic

  • κ-Opioid receptors within the nucleus accumbens shell mediate pair bond maintenance.

    Shanna L. Resendez;Morgan Kuhnmuench;Tarin Krzywosinski;Brandon J. Aragona

  • Nucleus accumbens dopamine mediates amphetamine-induced impairment of social bonding in a monogamous rodent species

    Yan Liu;Brandon J. Aragona;Kimberly A. Young;David M. Dietz;David M. Dietz

  • Social Bonding Decreases the Rewarding Properties of Amphetamine through a Dopamine D1 Receptor-Mediated Mechanism

    Y. Liu;K. A. Young;J. T. Curtis;B. J. Aragona

  • μ-Opioid receptors within subregions of the striatum mediate pair bond formation through parallel yet distinct reward mechanisms.

    Shanna L. Resendez;Mackenzie Dome;Gwen Gormley;Dena Franco

Frequent Co-Authors

Zuoxin Wang
Zuoxin Wang Florida State University
Regina M. Carelli
Regina M. Carelli University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
R. Mark Wightman
R. Mark Wightman University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Robert T. Kennedy
Robert T. Kennedy University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Michael R. Bruchas
Michael R. Bruchas University of Washington
Joseph F. Cheer
Joseph F. Cheer University of Maryland, Baltimore
Terry E. Robinson
Terry E. Robinson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Paul E. M. Phillips
Paul E. M. Phillips University of Washington
David M. Dietz
David M. Dietz University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Anne Z. Murphy
Anne Z. Murphy Georgia State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens doors to a wide range of careers in health, research, and counseling. Many students explore related fields to diversify their skills or streamline their path to impactful roles. One growing area is social work; an accelerated masters in social work allows graduates to quickly qualify for clinical and advocacy positions.

Psychology is another popular choice for neuroscience students interested in understanding human behavior. Accelerated psychology degree programs offer flexible, fast-tracked learning, helping professionals enter the workforce sooner.

If you're interested in supporting mental health, consider counseling. Accredited programs are vital for professional practice, and cacrep-accredited online counseling programs can provide high-quality training recognized across the country. For those seeking cost-effective education, there are also online counseling programs that are both affordable and reputable. These pathways can be excellent options for neuroscience graduates looking to expand their expertise and career options.

Best Scientists Citing Brandon J. Aragona

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles