World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
68
Citations
19885
World Ranking
2727
National Ranking
1275

Paul E. M. Phillips publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul E. M. Phillips sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 110 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Paul E. M. Phillips D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul E. M. Phillips sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1951 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1933 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Paul E. M. Phillips is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience and medicine, with significant contributions to cellular and molecular neuroscience, neurology, cognitive neuroscience, epidemiology, and emergency medicine.

The scientist's work explores a variety of main topics including neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, traumatic brain injury research, cardiac arrest and resuscitation, traumatic brain injury and neurovascular disturbances, stress responses and cortisol, and memory and neural mechanisms.

Paul E. M. Phillips has published extensively, with frequent contributions to venues such as UNC Libraries, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, Nano Letters, and the Journal of Neuroscience.

Notable recent papers include:

  • Implantable Aptamer-Graphene Microtransistors for Real-Time Monitoring of Neurochemical Release in Vivo (2022, Nano Letters)
  • Catecholaminergic Innervation of the Lateral Nucleus of the Cerebellum Modulates Cognitive Behaviors (2021, Journal of Neuroscience)
  • Repetitive blast mild traumatic brain injury increases ethanol sensitivity in male mice and risky drinking behavior in male combat veterans (2021, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research)
  • The 5α-reductase inhibitor finasteride reduces opioid self-administration in animal models of opioid use disorder (2021, Journal of Clinical Investigation)
  • Repetitive Blast Promotes Chronic Aversion to Neutral Cues Encountered in the Peri-Blast Environment (2020, Journal of Neurotrauma)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Paul E. M. Phillips include Abigail G. Schindler, Larry S. Zweifel, R. Mark Wightman, Suhjung Janet Lee, and Ryan D. Farero.

The scientist has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), receiving this distinction in both 1933 and 1951.

Best Publications

  • Subsecond dopamine release promotes cocaine seeking

    Paul E. M. Phillips;Garret D. Stuber;Michael L. A. V. Heien;R. Mark Wightman

  • A selective role for dopamine in stimulus–reward learning

    Shelly B. Flagel;Jeremy J. Clark;Terry E. Robinson;Leah Mayo

  • Two different subunits associate to create isoform-specific platelet-derived growth factor receptors.

    R A Seifert;C E Hart;P E Phillips;J W Forstrom

  • Dopamine Operates as a Subsecond Modulator of Food Seeking

    Mitchell F. Roitman;Garret D. Stuber;Paul E. M. Phillips;R. Mark Wightman

  • Prolonged dopamine signalling in striatum signals proximity and value of distant rewards

    Mark W. Howe;Patrick L. Tierney;Stefan G. Sandberg;Paul E. M. Phillips

  • Real-time measurement of dopamine fluctuations after cocaine in the brain of behaving rats

    Michael L. A. V. Heien;Amina S. Khan;Jennifer L. Ariansen;Joseph F. Cheer

  • Transient neuronal inhibition reveals opposing roles of indirect and direct pathways in sensitization

    Susan M Ferguson;Daniel Eskenazi;Masago Ishikawa;Matthew J Wanat

  • Disruption of NMDAR-dependent burst firing by dopamine neurons provides selective assessment of phasic dopamine-dependent behavior.

    Larry S. Zweifel;Jones Griffith Parker;Collin J. Lobb;Aundrea Rainwater

  • Overoxidation of carbon-fiber microelectrodes enhances dopamine adsorption and increases sensitivity.

    Michael L. A. V. Heien;Paul E. M. Phillips;Garret D. Stuber;Andrew T. Seipel

  • Cannabinoids Enhance Subsecond Dopamine Release in the Nucleus Accumbens of Awake Rats

    Joseph F. Cheer;Kate M. Wassum;Michael L. A. V. Heien;Paul E. M. Phillips

  • An animal model of genetic vulnerability to behavioral disinhibition and responsiveness to reward-related cues: implications for addiction.

    Shelly B Flagel;Terry E Robinson;Jeremy J Clark;Sarah M Clinton

  • Chronic microsensors for longitudinal, subsecond dopamine detection in behaving animals

    Jeremy J Clark;Stefan G Sandberg;Matthew J Wanat;Jerylin O Gan

  • Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and PDGF receptor are induced in mesangial proliferative nephritis in the rat.

    H Iida;R Seifert;C E Alpers;R G Gronwald

  • Weighing up the benefits of work: behavioral and neural analyses of effort-related decision making

    M. E. Walton;S. W. Kennerley;D. M. Bannerman;P. E. M. Phillips

  • Phasic dopamine release evoked by abused substances requires cannabinoid receptor activation.

    Joseph F. Cheer;Kate M. Wassum;Leslie A. Sombers;Michael L A V Heien

  • Severe stress switches CRF action in the nucleus accumbens from appetitive to aversive

    Julia C. Lemos;Matthew J. Wanat;Jeffrey S. Smith;Beverly A. S. Reyes

  • Real-time decoding of dopamine concentration changes in the caudate-putamen during tonic and phasic firing.

    B. Jill Venton;Hui Zhang;Paul A. Garris;Paul E. M. Phillips

  • Phasic Dopamine Release in the Rat Nucleus Accumbens Symmetrically Encodes a Reward Prediction Error Term

    Andrew S. Hart;Robb B. Rutledge;Paul W. Glimcher;Paul E. M. Phillips

  • Corticotropin-releasing factor increases mouse ventral tegmental area dopamine neuron firing through a protein kinase C-dependent enhancement of Ih

    M. J. Wanat;F. W. Hopf;G. D. Stuber;P. E M Phillips

  • Calculating utility: preclinical evidence for cost–benefit analysis by mesolimbic dopamine

    Paul E. M. Phillips;Mark E. Walton;Mark E. Walton;Thomas C. Jhou;Thomas C. Jhou

Frequent Co-Authors

R. Mark Wightman
R. Mark Wightman University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Larry S. Zweifel
Larry S. Zweifel University of Washington
Garret D. Stuber
Garret D. Stuber University of Washington
P. Read Montague
P. Read Montague Virginia Tech
Evgeny A. Budygin
Evgeny A. Budygin Wake Forest University
Mark E. Walton
Mark E. Walton University of Oxford
Regina M. Carelli
Regina M. Carelli University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Charles Chavkin
Charles Chavkin University of Washington
Jonathan A. Stamford
Jonathan A. Stamford Royal London Hospital
Elaine R. Peskind
Elaine R. Peskind University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Paul E. M. Phillips

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles