World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
7586
World Ranking
9720
National Ranking
5134

Neuroscience

D-Index
35
Citations
7621
World Ranking
9120
National Ranking
3843

Shelly B. Flagel publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shelly B. Flagel sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 91 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Shelly B. Flagel D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shelly B. Flagel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Shelly B. Flagel is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions to subfields including Genetics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, and Behavioral Neuroscience.

Flagel's work covers a range of topics with numerous publications addressing areas such as:

  • Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Neuroendocrine Regulation and Behavior
  • Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
  • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Their recent papers demonstrate active involvement in diverse aspects of neuroscience and genetics research. Notable publications include:

  • "Mapping sign-tracking and goal-tracking onto human behaviors," 2020, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • "Genome-Wide Association Study in 3,173 Outbred Rats Identifies Multiple Loci for Body Weight, Adiposity, and Fasting Glucose," 2020, Obesity
  • "Genetic characterization of outbred Sprague Dawley rats and utility for genome-wide association studies," 2022, PLoS Genetics
  • "The Paraventricular Thalamus as a Critical Node of Motivated Behavior via the Hypothalamic-Thalamic-Striatal Circuit," 2021, Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
  • "Sensitivity to food and cocaine cues are independent traits in a large sample of heterogeneous stock rats," 2021, Scientific Reports

Flagel's frequent co-authors reflect collaboration across genetics and neuroscience disciplines. Key collaborators include:

  • Apurva S. Chitre
  • Abraham A. Palmer
  • Oksana Polesskaya
  • Christopher P. King
  • Alexander Lamparelli

Flagel often publishes in venues associated with neuroscience and genetics research. Common publication platforms include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • PLoS Genetics
  • Scientific Reports

Best Publications

  • A selective role for dopamine in stimulus–reward learning

    Shelly B. Flagel;Jeremy J. Clark;Terry E. Robinson;Leah Mayo

  • Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: Implications for addiction

    Shelly B. Flagel;Huda Akil;Terry E. Robinson

  • Dissociating the predictive and incentive motivational properties of reward-related cues through the study of individual differences.

    Terry E. Robinson;Shelly B. Flagel

  • An animal model of genetic vulnerability to behavioral disinhibition and responsiveness to reward-related cues: implications for addiction.

    Shelly B Flagel;Terry E Robinson;Jeremy J Clark;Sarah M Clinton

  • Quantifying Individual Variation in the Propensity to Attribute Incentive Salience to Reward Cues

    Paul J. Meyer;Vedran Lovic;Benjamin T. Saunders;Lindsay M. Yager

  • Differential Regulation of Hippocampal Glucocorticoid Receptors mRNA and Fast Feedback: Relevance to Post‐Traumatic Stress Disorder

    Isreal Liberzon;J. F. López;S. B. Flagel;D. M. Vázquez

  • Individual differences in the propensity to approach signals vs goals promote different adaptations in the dopamine system of rats

    Shelly B. Flagel;Stanley J. Watson;Terry E. Robinson;Huda Akil

  • Neuroendocrine and Psychophysiologic Responses in PTSD: A Symptom Provocation Study

    Israel Liberzon;James L Abelson;Shelly B Flagel;Jonathan Raz

  • Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to a reward-related cue: Influence on cocaine sensitization.

    Shelly B. Flagel;Stanley J. Watson;Huda Akil;Terry E. Robinson

  • A FOOD PREDICTIVE CUE MUST BE ATTRIBUTED WITH INCENTIVE SALIENCE FOR IT TO INDUCE c-FOS mRNA EXPRESSION IN CORTICO-STRIATAL-THALAMIC BRAIN REGIONS

    Shelly B. Flagel;Courtney M. Cameron;Kristen N. Pickup;Stanley J. Watson

  • Variation in the Form of Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Behavior among Outbred Male Sprague-Dawley Rats from Different Vendors and Colonies: Sign-Tracking vs. Goal-Tracking

    Christopher J. Fitzpatrick;Shyam Gopalakrishnan;Elizabeth S. Cogan;Lindsay M. Yager

  • Neurobiological basis of individual variation in stimulus-reward learning

    Shelly B Flagel;Terry E Robinson

  • Persistent Alterations in Cognitive Function and Prefrontal Dopamine D2 Receptors Following Extended, but Not Limited, Access to Self-Administered Cocaine

    Lisa A Briand;Shelly B Flagel;M Julia Garcia-Fuster;Stanley J Watson;Stanley J Watson

  • Antecedents and consequences of drug abuse in rats selectively bred for high and low response to novelty.

    Shelly B. Flagel;Maria Waselus;Sarah M. Clinton;Stanley J. Watson;Stanley J. Watson

  • Effects of tapering neonatal dexamethasone on rat growth, neurodevelopment, and stress response.

    Shelly B. Flagel;Delia M. Vázquez;Stanley J. Watson;Stanley J. Watson;Charles R. Neal

  • Individual variation in the propensity to attribute incentive salience to a food cue: Influence of sex

    Kyle K. Pitchers;Shelly B. Flagel;Elizabeth G. O’Donnell;Leah C. Solberg Woods

  • Individual Variation in the Motivational and Neurobiological Effects of an Opioid Cue

    Lindsay M Yager;Kyle K Pitchers;Shelly B Flagel;Terry E Robinson

  • The role of learning-related dopamine signals in addiction vulnerability.

    Quentin J.M. Huys;Philippe N. Tobler;Gregor Hasler;Shelly B. Flagel;Shelly B. Flagel

  • The paraventricular thalamus is a critical mediator of top-down control of cue-motivated behavior in rats

    Paolo Campus;Ignacio R Covelo;Youngsoo Kim;Aram Parsegian

  • Modelling Individual Differences in the Form of Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Responses: A Dual Learning Systems Approach with Factored Representations

    Florian Lesaint;Olivier Sigaud;Shelly B. Flagel;Shelly B. Flagel;Terry E. Robinson

  • Rats are the smart choice: Rationale for a renewed focus on rats in behavioral genetics

    Clarissa C. Parker;Hao Chen;Shelly B. Flagel;Aron M. Geurts

Frequent Co-Authors

Terry E. Robinson
Terry E. Robinson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Huda Akil
Huda Akil University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Stanley J. Watson
Stanley J. Watson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Abraham A. Palmer
Abraham A. Palmer University of California, San Diego
Martin Sarter
Martin Sarter University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Olivier Sigaud
Olivier Sigaud Sorbonne University
Martin P. Paulus
Martin P. Paulus Laureate Institute for Brain Research
Ashley N. Gearhardt
Ashley N. Gearhardt University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Paul E. M. Phillips
Paul E. M. Phillips University of Washington
Robert C. Thompson
Robert C. Thompson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience is a versatile field that opens doors to numerous online degrees and diverse career tracks. For those interested in the clinical side, pursuing an online psyd can lead to careers in clinical psychology, mental health counseling, or neuropsychological assessment.

Another related option is in therapy and counseling. Students may consider marriage and family therapy programs online, which can prepare you for a rewarding role in therapy, focusing on individuals, couples, and families affected by neurological or psychological concerns.

If you’re eager to start your career sooner, you might explore accelerated degrees online. These programs enable you to complete your studies quickly and efficiently, getting you into the workforce faster.

Finally, when planning your career, it’s valuable to consider degrees that pay well. Many neuroscience-related fields offer competitive salaries, making this an attractive academic and professional pathway.

Best Scientists Citing Shelly B. Flagel

Trending Scientists