World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
49
Citations
10829
World Ranking
5917
National Ranking
259

Serge H. Ahmed publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Serge H. Ahmed sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 147 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Serge H. Ahmed D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Serge H. Ahmed sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Serge H. Ahmed is affiliated with the University of Bordeaux in France. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with a significant body of work in cellular and molecular neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, molecular biology, social psychology, and clinical psychology.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior
  • Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Receptor mechanisms and signaling
  • Memory and neural mechanisms
  • Neuroscience and neuropharmacology research
  • Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors study
  • Neural and behavioral psychology studies

Frequent publication venues for Ahmed's work include:

  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Addiction Biology
  • Psychopharmacology

Their recent papers illustrate key themes in addiction neuroscience and behavior, including:

  • "Habit, choice, and addiction," 2020, Neuropsychopharmacology
  • "Pharmacokinetics trumps pharmacodynamics during cocaine choice: a reconciliation with the dopamine hypothesis of addiction," 2020, Neuropsychopharmacology
  • "Are we compulsively chasing rainbows?," 2022, Neuropsychopharmacology
  • "Pharmacokinetics trumps pharmacodynamics during cocaine choice: a reconciliation with the dopamine hypothesis of addiction," 2021, PubMed
  • "Habitual Preference for the Nondrug Reward in a Drug Choice Setting," 2020, Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience

Ahmed collaborates frequently with several researchers in their field, including:

  • Caroline Vouillac-Mendoza
  • Karine Guillem
  • Youna Vandaele
  • Audrey Durand
  • Magalie Lenoir

Best Publications

  • Transition from moderate to excessive drug intake : Change in Hedonic set point

    S. H. Ahmed;G. F. Koob

  • Intense sweetness surpasses cocaine reward.

    Magalie Lenoir;Fuschia Serre;Lauriane Cantin;Serge H. Ahmed

  • Neurobiological mechanisms in the transition from drug use to drug dependence

    George F Koob;Serge H Ahmed;Benjamin Boutrel;Scott A Chen

  • Neurobiological evidence for hedonic allostasis associated with escalating cocaine use.

    Serge H Ahmed;Paul J Kenny;George F Koob;Athina Markou

  • Persistent increase in the motivation to take heroin in rats with a history of drug escalation.

    Serge H Ahmed;John R Walker;George F Koob

  • Long-lasting increase in the set point for cocaine self-administration after escalation in rats.

    Serge H. Ahmed;George F. Koob

  • Cocaine-but not food-seeking behavior is reinstated by stress after extinction

    S. H. Ahmed;George F. Koob

  • Transition to drug addiction: a negative reinforcement model based on an allostatic decrease in reward function.

    Serge H. Ahmed;Serge H. Ahmed;George F. Koob

  • Validation crisis in animal models of drug addiction: beyond non-disordered drug use toward drug addiction.

    Serge H. Ahmed

  • The science of making drug-addicted animals.

    Serge Ahmed

  • A transdiagnostic dimensional approach towards a neuropsychological assessment for addiction: an international Delphi consensus study

    Murat Yücel;Erin Oldenhof;Serge H. Ahmed;David Belin

  • Sugar addiction: pushing the drug-sugar analogy to the limit.

    Serge H. Ahmed;Karine Guillem;Youna Vandaele

  • Dissociation of psychomotor sensitization from compulsive cocaine consumption.

    Serge H Ahmed;Martine Cador

  • Cocaine Is Low on the Value Ladder of Rats: Possible Evidence for Resilience to Addiction

    Lauriane Cantin;Magalie Lenoir;Eric Augier;Nathalie Vanhille

  • Detailed analysis of the behavior of Lister and Wistar rats in anxiety, object recognition and object location tasks

    Unknown

  • Neurobiology of addiction versus drug use driven by lack of choice

    Serge H Ahmed;Magalie Lenoir;Magalie Lenoir;Karine Guillem;Karine Guillem

  • Risk-Prone Individuals Prefer the Wrong Options on a Rat Version of the Iowa Gambling Task

    Marion Rivalan;Serge H. Ahmed;Françoise Dellu-Hagedorn

  • Gene expression evidence for remodeling of lateral hypothalamic circuitry in cocaine addiction

    Serge H. Ahmed;Robert Lutjens;Lena D. van der Stap;Dusan Lekic

  • Explaining the escalation of drug use in substance dependence: models and appropriate animal laboratory tests.

    Gerald Zernig;Serge H. Ahmed;Rudolf N. Cardinal;Drake Morgan

  • Escalation of cocaine self-administration does not depend on altered cocaine-induced nucleus accumbens dopamine levels.

    Serge H. Ahmed;Daniel Lin;George F. Koob;Loren H. Parsons

  • The transition from controlled to compulsive drug use is associated with a loss of sensitization.

    Osnat Ben-Shahar;Serge H. Ahmed;George F. Koob;Aaron Ettenberg

  • Sugar Overconsumption during Adolescence Selectively Alters Motivation and Reward Function in Adult Rats

    Leandro F. Vendruscolo;Aliou B. Gueye;Muriel Darnaudéry;Serge H. Ahmed

  • Microinjections of an opiate receptor antagonist into the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis suppress heroin self-administration in dependent rats

    John R. Walker;Serge H. Ahmed;K.Noelle Gracy;George F. Koob

  • Heroin-induced reinstatement is specific to compulsive heroin use and dissociable from heroin reward and sensitization.

    Magalie Lenoir;Serge H Ahmed

Frequent Co-Authors

George F. Koob
George F. Koob National Institute on Drug Abuse
Martine Cador
Martine Cador University of Bordeaux
Boris Gutkin
Boris Gutkin École Normale Supérieure
Erwan Bezard
Erwan Bezard University of Bordeaux
Paul J. Kenny
Paul J. Kenny Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Pierre-Olivier Fernagut
Pierre-Olivier Fernagut University of Poitiers
Christelle Baunez
Christelle Baunez Aix-Marseille University
George R. Siggins
George R. Siggins Scripps Research Institute
François Tison
François Tison University of Bordeaux

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience majors have a diverse range of options when it comes to furthering their education and building a career. Many students interested in clinical work might consider pursuing doctoral-level programs. If you’re looking for efficiency, shortest online psyd programs can fast-track your journey toward clinical psychology roles.

For those interested in counseling and therapy, exploring lmft programs can open doors to marriage and family therapy careers. These programs often build on neuroscience principles, especially in mental health applications.

If you’re just starting out, you might look at options for an accelerated bachelor's degree. These programs allow you to complete your undergraduate studies faster, saving time and money while gaining essential knowledge.

Finally, if long-term earning potential is a top priority, researching the best degrees in the world can help you select pathways that align with your financial goals. Neuroscience provides a solid foundation for many high-demand, high-paying careers across healthcare, research, and technology.

Best Scientists Citing Serge H. Ahmed

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles